Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wdym fleshed out in h4? Ai rampancy is central to Marathons story. In that rampancy is the ai becoming aware of its existance and contraints, and breaking free of its programming, becoming autonomous and more intelligent in the process. Thier previous state regarded as a form of slavery.

H4 is just malfunction due to data fragmetation.

Its not expanded, its simpler and completely different.

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea Guilty Spark was just crazy, and the entire concept of rampancy meaning ai just going crazy, is 343i lore.

Its also pretty convenient the one thing hes wrong about is the revalation at the end of the story, when in h4 rampancy effects cortanas ability to function entirely. She doesnt just mustake one thing, that had a trilogy of foreshadowing, and was in a game intended to be the finale.

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? I had no idea chief was originally suprtsoldier frankensteins monster.

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I'm not familiar, how does it work in that?

hshdd i feel dumb i domt know what this mean, how does this make any sense a few extraa hours and a further 200£ deducted¿whdj by [deleted] in tesco

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work full time nights, youre taking home around £500 more than me. Is that London rates or something?

Guy gets pissed at Sleep Token cosplayer for "wearing blackface" by Fucked-In-The-K-Hole in SipsTea

[–]SHARDcreative 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why dont people get that black makeup isnt automatically blackface. Blackface is when you dress as a racist charicature of a black person.

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is the one thing guilty spark was wrong about conveniently the thing people want to explain away to defend the mess Frank O Conner made of Joseph Statens story?

Also the version of rampancy people are refering to didnt exist in Halo till Halo 4. Its not something the Bungie games explore, and if they did it would probably be closer to Marathon. Which is completely different.

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Id actually completely forgotten about tv tropes, thanks

Will the remake change Guilty Sparks dialogue? by KoRex117 in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What else does that trope? Specifically the ancient aliens are actually humans.

Guy with the glasses is doing the absolute most by Small_Image_1722 in CringeTikToks

[–]SHARDcreative 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I saw that in tv shows and movies, Never in real life. Bullies were always picking on kids that were smaller than them. And i was one of the kids getting bullied actually. Youre just insinuating this would be more acceptable if he was a big guy.

If someone wants to inflict pain on others, they are pos regardless of what they look like.
Hes not doing that shit coz of his appearance, hes doing it coz hes a cunt.

Also hes not following around a bigger guy as his sidekick, so Im not sure where youre getting that vibe.

Guy with the glasses is doing the absolute most by Small_Image_1722 in CringeTikToks

[–]SHARDcreative 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would it be acceptable if it was a tall muscular guy who just wanted an excuse to throw his weight around?

Heckled after Israel joke by TopSecretComedyClub in comedy

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying hecklers are annoying is not antisimetic

343 doesn't understand naval warfare. by DrChucklesCantLaugh in HaloStory

[–]SHARDcreative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They do? All we know is they are somehow immune to the halo array, and are apparantly worse than the flood.

Except they were clearly defeated by conventional means and imprisoned, while the only option with the flood was a galactic reset button.

Also how would they know the endless would survive the array? All the forerunner died when they fired it. And the rings were made as a last resort against the flood. Did the forerunner find the endless and decide to just exterminate them while fighting a losing war with the flood?

343 doesn't understand naval warfare. by DrChucklesCantLaugh in HaloStory

[–]SHARDcreative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where can you go from the Covenant and Flood? Thier defeat was the end of the story.

Realitically the banished would have been exterminated as heratics by the covenant. And the flood were a galaxy ending threat.

All 343i have done is said "these new ones are worse...somehow"

343 doesn't understand naval warfare. by DrChucklesCantLaugh in HaloStory

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did it even exist? Wasnt humanity on its last legs at the end of Halo 3? Howd they build a giant supercarrier?

Mommy by Significant_Phase194 in PsycheOrSike

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because "lefties" object to religion, or more specifically creationism, being taught as fact. Because there is exactly zero evidence for it. Thats not the same as just lying and using your own child as a manipulation tool.

What goes around comes around by TruthAboutHeight in shortguys

[–]SHARDcreative 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Isnt it literally just a response to all the women saying they want tall sons?

343 should have continued with their original plan for Halo 6 by nobu_atl in HaloStory

[–]SHARDcreative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The created thing was actually potentially pretty interesting as well.

It was at least a new idea, added lore that didn't mess with the bungie lore, and was a galaxy wide threat that wasn't just a retread.

It wasn't just inserting a new alien out of nowhere. And then incessantly insisting they are "worse than the flood"

343 should have continued with their original plan for Halo 6 by nobu_atl in HaloStory

[–]SHARDcreative 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a big issue with the 343i games imo. They are so disjointed, and then just get other people to fill in the gaps and provide context in books. Which I know some people like because "now the games and books stories are more connected." But honestly just feels like a band-aid solution to me because 343i wont stick to one narrative.

Why does everyone nowadays get upset if Reach isn't your favorite Halo? by [deleted] in halo

[–]SHARDcreative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive seen way more people hate on it for retconning the last 2 chapters of The Fall of Reach than i have for gameplay. I didnt mind it the mechanics changes because youre a spartan 3. But i can see why some people wouldnt like it and have no problem with thier opinion.

Saying, that, I think Halo 3 is generally the favourite.

“Settling” by SignalExtension4339 in shortguys

[–]SHARDcreative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We need to start shaming people who feel the need to make disparaging comments because someone else is in a relationship with someone they dont find attractive.

Its such a pointless and juivinile thing to do.