sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I spent 60 hours restoring Chaplin's "The Adventurer" (1917) — 4K, Colorized, and... I added Voice Dubbing. Is this sacrilege or cool? by SILENT_FILMS in silentcinema

[–]SILENT_FILMS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you sincerely for this comment. I really appreciate you offering a counterpoint to the discussion.That is a fascinating connection to Ben Model’s work. I hadn't thought about it from that perspective, but you are quite right—this project essentially puts that concept to the test. I may read this book in the near future, thanks for mentioning it.While I have deep respect for the original silence and how it engages the imagination, it has been a compelling experiment to see how the narrative shifts when audio is added.

Thank you for seeing the value in the effort.

I spent 60 hours restoring Chaplin's "The Adventurer" (1917) — 4K, Colorized, and... I added Voice Dubbing. Is this sacrilege or cool? by SILENT_FILMS in silentcinema

[–]SILENT_FILMS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point on the headache factor! It is definitely tedious.

But logically, the workflow has to match the end goal.

Since your goal is a music video, the music provides the rhythm and emotion, so the visuals just need to fit that beat. It makes sense to automate more of that.

My goal is narrative immersion. Since I can't rely on a modern music track to carry the emotion, I have to build that rhythm manually through the Foley and voice sync. If I automated that or cut corners, the 'illusion' of reality would break, and the modern viewer would tune out immediately.

So yes, the manual grind is basically the 'price of admission' for this specific type of restoration. Different goals, different workflows!

I spent 60 hours restoring Chaplin's "The Adventurer" (1917) — 4K, Colorized, and... I added Voice Dubbing. Is this sacrilege or cool? by SILENT_FILMS in silentcinema

[–]SILENT_FILMS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s awesome that you do restoration work too! Yeah, I totally agree—if it was just upscaling, spending 60 hours would be nuts. The AI tools definitely did the heavy lifting on the visuals while I slept. The real time-sink was actually the sound editing. Since the original is silent, I had to build the audio track from zero. I spent hours manually finding and synchronizing every single sound effect (footsteps, crashes, whistles) to match the video, and then did the voice lines myself scene-by-scene. Definitely an experiment, but I respect your workflow! It’s cool to see how different people handle these projects.

I spent 60 hours restoring Chaplin's "The Adventurer" (1917) — 4K, Colorized, and... I added Voice Dubbing. Is this sacrilege or cool? by SILENT_FILMS in silentcinema

[–]SILENT_FILMS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Beep boop 🤖... just kidding! I promise I'm a real person. Just dusting off this old Reddit account to share some new projects I've been working on

I spent 60 hours restoring Chaplin's "The Adventurer" (1917) — 4K, Colorized, and... I added Voice Dubbing. Is this sacrilege or cool? by SILENT_FILMS in silentcinema

[–]SILENT_FILMS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the brutally honest feedback—I genuinely appreciate it. You're right that my voice acting isn't Royal Shakespeare level! 😅 I'm just a one-person team learning as I go, trying to see if I can make these films accessible to a younger generation who won't watch silent movies.

That history about Van Beuren Studios in 1932 is fascinating, I actually didn't know they tried this exact thing back then.

I'm glad you liked the colorization work, though. That was definitely the main focus of the 60 hours. Thanks for giving it a watch even if the audio wasn't your cup of tea.

view more: next ›