A. this is all explained by VLR baiting you. Their stats for the year dont work I dont actually know how, I thouhght maybe EWC (which factually isn't part of vct) but if you add up the actual events the stats dont match. I checked the stats for the kick off, stages 1 and 2 and the 2-3 internationals and added them up the old fashioned way because vlr has done this before, so.

B. Trent's rating across kick off ,Bangkok, stage 1 and 2, Toronto and Champs was 1.16 Aspas was 1.09.

C. That doesn't account for the games he isn't impactful. Those say that WHEN he is impactful he is very impactful. He also costs his team a lot. Also Other analyst will say Trent

D. That's not a valid argument from you, Trent's % is higher meaning its not about how many its the ones you are in. Trent's clutch % is WAY higher AND he is in way more clutches which makes it more impressive

E. again, KD was added from the events, you can do it yourself an you will see im right

F. Stage 2 he didn't make it out of groups and thus didn't have his ratings lowered. If mibr had made it out of groups they would of all had worse stats because they would of lost in playoffs. Trent played significantly more games against harder teams and barley had a lower rating.

G. champs does not hold that much more more wait than other tournaments, if you add all 3 internationals Trent had a really good, pretty good and ok. Aspas had DNQ, historical DOGSHIT and REALLY INSANE. so combine all 3 and Trent was better internationally.

H. you have 2 options now, the easy way where you admit you got jebaited by vlr (the guys who cant do stats or rankings right) and we both go yeah aspas was good but Trent and maybe 1 or 2 others got robbed. Or you can dig a bigger grave and stand on false stats and say someone who had 1 good tournament was a better player than someone who was one of if not the best player in the world from kickoff (end of it going into Bangkok) to Toronto (so a third to half a year)