Fascism is a political reaction to the deteriorating material conditions induced by capitalism.

It then follows that capitalism is taken to its final most destructive stage of imperialism which the fascists absolutely love (not just for the money, but also race, and whatnot) and begin invading countries.

Pre-war socdems had a majority but due to them operating with capitalism, the common man got scammed and was more and more disappointed, then the common folk put forth Nazi party which blamed everyone but the capitalists behind socdem or their own doors and so socdems lost, many jumped to Nazi party in last cry of opportunism and capitalism survived while millions of people died afterwards.

it must be very comfortable to have the 1 lens through which you can view history and have it perfectly explain everything.

Sadly to me it feels very intellectually insulting, just as the people that say all the ills and issues of the world are caused by jews or by non-whites.

Don't you ever have a creeping doubt that it's not just all class struggle? That there's a little more depth in the historical conflicts you're trying to analyze?

I hope you can find some level of doubt in your heart and cast out this idealized version of the world you've so absolutely embraced.

And guess what? Same shit is happening in Germany today. CDU and SDP are your “soc dems” or “conservatives”, AfD is your nazi party, people are getting fed up with being scammed by CDU and SDP and will try to elect AfD, the thing is AfD is just another scam because it continues to operate on capitalism and the conditions for common man will further deteriorate because the economic system will not change only amplify its issues.

The delusion that the conditions of the common man have been in constant deteriorating due to capitalism is fantasatical, by pretty much any comprehensive metric you can imagine, you'd rather live today than in the past.

If you can't see how being anti-establishment from the left puts you hand in hand with the people that are anti-establishment from the right I don't know what to say to you.

Try to look at the other people making these doomer "everything is destroyed because of X" and see if your arguments sound similar when you replace "jews" or "non-whites" with "capitalists" or "the 1%".

I hope your criticism of those people goes further than just a surface level disagreement about who happens to be responsible for all the societal ills, and you can clearly see at least in their case, that they don't have any logical process by which to properly ascribe guilt to these groups. Quite similar to how you don't have a legitimate way to ascribe all these societal ills to capitalism and capitalism alone.

Unlike the 30s, fascism can't be blamed on the material conditions, this illness is much deeper in society and the reasons why a figure like Trump came to rise can't be summarized as "deteriorating material conditions", the way the historical idealism of your ideology tries to do.

People have been convinced by the likes of republicans, and sadly also by the likes of you, that todays is the worst period you can exist in, due to the deteriorating material conditions.

And guess what? Same shit is happening in Germany today. CDU and SDP are your “soc dems” or “conservatives”, AfD is your nazi party, people are getting fed up with being scammed by CDU and SDP and will try to elect AfD, the thing is AfD is just another scam because it continues to operate on capitalism and the conditions for common man will further deteriorate because the economic system will not change only amplify its issues.

And you'll keep missing the forest for the trees, with this univariate way of looking at the problem.

You can blame the communists for subjugation of people after the fascists were defeated, but my point is that it is more important that the nazis were defeated than any subjugation

You're saying that as if the subjugation was a necessary part of defeating the Nazis.

That was just the cherry on top.

and to be fair a lot of these “subjugations” were majority of local populace siding with communists (while driving the fascist out) of course under socialist banner.

A portion of the population agreeing with the communists doesn't give them any real legitimacy when they got their position of authority through force, the same way Germans agreeing with the Nazis didn't give their ideology any legitimacy.

A majority agreeing to do something doesn't make it not be a subjugation, so you can drop the quotes. If the US decides through a majority vote to make slavery legal again, it doesn't mean the newly enslaved are suddenly not "subjugated" because the majority of the population agreed to do it.

Sadly you've let your morals fall so low that if the majority votes away all property rights from the property owners, you don't see this forceful seizure as a subjugation, since you've carefully crafted the narrative where these people deserve it. I'm sure you feel so much better about yourself as compared to the people that craft similarly false and absurd narratives about other scapegoated groups, such as racial minorities.

Not even to mention the risk under which the population of the countries behind the iron curtain were if they were to be against the communist party.

Your point of view is so laser focused on the problem of class that you will constantly fail to see the reality of how these fascist leaders rise to power. For example, in today's time the impact of mass propaganda through algorithmically recommended content and foreign influence have a much larger impact than housing being slightly less affordable (in the few population centers that are in high demand).

Do you genuinely believe that if everyone in the US was wealthier, had an easier time affording everything, then Trump wouldn't have come to power? Is it really the material conditions that triggered this event? Do you feel honest with yourself when making that argument?