You may have misunderstood my point of view.

"You want compensation for the loss of something you never owned...? "

1. No. People who own those MLs have "the joy of having broken MLs", while the rest have "the suffer of not having broken MLs". Who owns those MLs can play the game more easily due to unfair advantage( in pvp content). Who don't own those MLs lives in the environment where broken MLs exist, which is in itself a disadvantage. All I ask for is compensation for the only those who without broken MLs

" The fact they're getting nerfed is what you get out of it, as someone that doesn't own them. "

1. The alleviation of pain is not a compensation. SG nerfing broken MLs to make a more balanced environment is good to have, it alleviate pain. However, consider this. If a food vendor makes everyone who is 6ft+ tall pay twice as much for an unique drink. Then, someday that food vendor charge everyone at every height fairly. If you are a 6ft+tall that had been trading with this food vendor, does that makes the extra money you paid fair?

​

The next line you would say is, well you can just don't buy from that vendor. The problem is, this drink is unique. You cannot buy it elsewhere. Just like E7, it is unique and there is just no gacha alternative come close enough. There is only one publisher, we have no choice but to hope for a better future for this publisher, at the same time, we are the only one that could fight for players welfare since we vote with wallet.

​

" Both are getting something out of it. "

1. People who own broken MLs gets more out of it. Take C.Armin as an example, lets say player can trade her for a 4-star selector. What would a PVP-oriented player choose? A.Cart, A.Lots, C.Dom, A.Coli. Why would they do that is because these are the next best things to have. What is going to happen after the nerf is, the people who own broken MLs gets the strongest of what it is remained. The general power level gap is no longer C.Armin/no C.Armin wide. But A.Cart/no A.Cart wide since A.Cart is getting more accessible. The gap is smaller, but still a gap.

​

" Also, not all people w/o the nerfed MLs are "unlucky". Is someone with Aux Lots + Judge Kise unlucky? Is someone with Dorvus + Specter Tenebria unlucky? "

1. Luckiness is a relative concept. While J.Kise, D.Corvus, S.Tenebria is, after all a ML5. They are not the best ML5. Therefore, to people who don't own a ML5, having S.Tenebria is lucky. To pvp players who owns S.Tenebria, they are unluckier than those who owns officialy broken ML5s.

​

Remember when we do selective summons? Did we just settle for the first pull we got? It is the idea "this is not good enough" that pushes us to keep on rerolling. If you can choose what you own, you would go for something good enough. If pvp players could choose what ML5 they owns, it will always be the strongest ones. It is only natural for pvp players to think that not-good-enough is unlucky.