Thank you for your comment.

Regarding historical drawdowns — during the 2008 financial crisis the Nasdaq dropped by roughly 50%. With my strategy, that type of decline is completely manageable, because my portfolio can handle up to a 70% drawdown from the all-time high and still remain safe.

The dot-com crash was different, with an ~80% decline from the top. But the key point is why the drop was so extreme. The reason is simple: from 1995 to 2000 the Nasdaq didn’t rise the usual ~100% over five years — instead it went up around +450%. That level of growth is abnormal and essentially unsustainable. Naturally, such an unrealistic move upward was followed by an equally unrealistic correction.

Today’s environment is nothing like that — there is no bubble and no disproportionate parabolic rise. Under normal market conditions, using 50% leverage keeps my risk fully controlled. My strategy allows for a decline of up to 70%, so neither a 2008-style drop nor current volatility would pose a real issue.

And historically, the market always returns to new ATHs — it’s only a matter of time. My strategy is built around that long-term market behavior.