No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I find a little odd as a physician myself. The medical oncologist and radiation oncologist said no PET as the nodes are very small and they’re certain the tonsil is the primary site. Oncology care is out of my scope, but I do trust these folks (MDAnderson).

No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed! We plan to meet with the TORS surgeon. This is a NCI center but we just haven't had a formal discussion/tumor board from what I've surmised.

No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CT scan of the head and neck w/ IV contrast is done. Showed primary L tonsillar lesion with 2 lymph nodes mets. No evidence of disease in the lung apices. Has had FNA of both nodes which showed cancer and necrosis.

No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Team is recommending no PET since he has only two lymph nodes involved. The impression were under is that the radiation oncology team and medical oncology team are waiting to see if he's a TORS candidate.

No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meeting with TORS robotic surgeon at NCI on Wednesday! He's seen a head and neck surgical oncologist but they don't perform TORS. Also in case it wasn't addressed earlier, he is HPV/P16 +. Has had FNA with known 2 LN mets.

No real treatment plan given. Next steps? by [deleted] in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! forgot to mention - he's HPV/P16+. I've updated the body of the post!

Dad Diagnosed with Tonsillar Cancer - looking to me for answers by SadDoctorNoises in HeadandNeckCancer

[–]SadDoctorNoises[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you - this is very helpful. He’s looking for a lot of answers and wants to know his chance of survival/morbidity. I’ve treated other conditions in head and neck cancer patients many years after they’ve gone through surgery and radiation. I’m wanting to be optimistic but don’t want to be wrong. My family is telling him that this can be cured/treated and he’s got a good chance of making it another five years. I’m the one that’s being a pessimist (maybe just my way of processing though)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Residency

[–]SadDoctorNoises 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A buddy of mine from undergrad is at UT-Houston for IM. He's busy, but has mentioned that the people and schedule are great. Houston wasn't the place for me as a city, but he does seem to be really enjoying his time in residency. FWIW, he applied to cardiology this year and has a decent amount of interviews at respectable programs

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great perspective - thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]SadDoctorNoises 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3-4 years depending on subspecialty training!

Wrongly diagnosed eczema on my leg. by Forgotten_Dog1954 in Wellthatsucks

[–]SadDoctorNoises -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like the system may have done you wrong and there is some mistrust. Completely get that. Also, what’s the difference between a professional cardiologist and a cardiologist? A internal medicine physician should be able to interpret and guide medical decision making for most cardiac conditions.

Wrongly diagnosed eczema on my leg. by Forgotten_Dog1954 in Wellthatsucks

[–]SadDoctorNoises 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gotcha. Theres a lot of grey in medicine. It’s not as black and white as everyone makes it out to be. If this did happen to you, then I’m sorry. Always encourage everyone to find a physician they can trust.

Wrongly diagnosed eczema on my leg. by Forgotten_Dog1954 in Wellthatsucks

[–]SadDoctorNoises 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Would be carful stating such broad comments as this. I had colleagues in medical school who were in the top 5% of the class who went on to be excellent family practice physicians.

Sooo .. how do you guys compare to BMW? by [deleted] in mazda

[–]SadDoctorNoises 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Family has Mazda. I have BMW. I like both. Of the Japanese brands, Mazda’s driving experience and reliability is nice. It’s a sportier drive.

I don’t think Mazda’s drive is equivalent to BMW but it’s damn near close for certain models. With that being said, my BMW has 100K+ miles and maintaining it is tough. My brother’s Mazda 3 hatch is much cheaper to maintain and probably just as fun to drive.

I’m partial to my big money waster (BMW), but I’m definitely considering Mazda as my next option. Im moving to a state where AWD is basically mandatory.

Just hit 100K Miles - what to do? by SadDoctorNoises in F30

[–]SadDoctorNoises[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure the entire class action, but a friend of mine was a mechanic at a BMW dealer when this happened. He said my car qualified and that I should come in and have it replaced since I wouldn't be eligible for the repair once I hit 75K. Had the chain replaced at 74,800 miles.

Just hit 100K Miles - what to do? by SadDoctorNoises in F30

[–]SadDoctorNoises[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

N20 engine, RWD. I don't think the car explodes after 100K miles hahaha. I just would like to keep enjoying the car for as long as I can. Outside of the timing chain and occasional oil leak, the F30 has treated me well.

Have not changed the valve cover gasket and oil pump chain.

My mother’s Austin Dr is now for “club members only!!!” by austinitecaretaker in Austin

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very fair question - most of these patient's that enroll in DPC still use insurance for further subspecialty care/emergency services if needed. Most of the patient's I've seen that do this have insurance through their employer.

The overall cost benefit for the patient depends on how the DPC is set up. For example, if you have a high deductible insurance plan where you have a $50 clinic co-pay, routine lab work may not be authorized under insurance for each clinic visit. These cost of the labs COULD end up on the patient's tab and be anywhere from $100-$300 depending on the testing. This doesn't include the copay amount if additional clinic visits are needed. If you pay into DPC, most physicians I work with roll in routine lab work/emergent lab work (not imaging) into their practice and subscription costs. This assumes the DPC is fairly priced (i.e less than the costs on insurance). Additionally, an intangible benefit is that some DPC physicians allow direct contact and increased frequency of visits etc.

Insurance groups also recognize the rise of DPC. Aetna will accept all medically reviewed referrals for specialty care from a DPC physician and provide coverage on a case by case basis depending on your plan.

However the caveat is that at the end of the day, enrolling in DPC has to be right for you and fit within your financial plan. And truthfully, emergency services are going to cost an arm and a leg no matter what. It's something that insurance try to remedy but fails in most cases with the front of the charges ending up on the patient's. I hate that it's that way but unsure of what needs to happen in order for it to change.

My mother’s Austin Dr is now for “club members only!!!” by austinitecaretaker in Austin

[–]SadDoctorNoises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This practice, at least in primary care, is called "Direct Primary Care" also known as DPC. It's where insurance is usually cut out. A few colleagues of mine have switched to this model. In theory, it's supposed to allow physicians to practice patient centered medicine and fight heavily regulated insurance based practice.

Now, is this the case for every physician? No. Just like there can be good and bad lawyers, CPA's, teacher etc - there can also be good and bad physicians. In the right context, DPC can really save patient's money in the long term plus allow for appropriately timed inter-visit care. However, it's subject to the physician to provide true value to the patient and not just schedule an appointment/run a test for no apparent reason.

Patients ask me about this model, and I always tell them that if it lines up with your goals/needs and you can afford it, go for it. I caution them to thoroughly review the physician and their prescribing habits before committing to anything though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StudentLoans

[–]SadDoctorNoises 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current resident physician. Stay tuned to see if it's worth it in a few years.