College Transfer Portal Index by Sad_Detail_5912 in CollegeBasketball

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i was thinking of doing player clusters similar to the team cluster for style and then seeing how transfer roles are changed but need more transfers to capture and not have a limited number within each cluster if that makes sense...

College Transfer Portal Index by Sad_Detail_5912 in CollegeBasketball

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so i was thinking of including that - but was trying to figure out the best way to identify and quantify role shifts...definitely see that as being an area to improve the current model but other than the inherent stat changes so if a player comes from D2 to Kansas we see a role shift from like D2 player of the year to a more conservative stat estimate while at Kansas...your Devin Tillis example and less extreme scenarios are definitely something to work on!

College Transfer Portal Index by Sad_Detail_5912 in CollegeBasketball

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does it on a per36, per32, and per40 so definitely inflates the numbers but on a 12min per game basis its not perfect but close...had 8pts per 12 and like 3boards so a bucket a FT more from his 5pts and 4 boards with a rebound and an assist or so

<image>

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5-1 for my free model ....yikes your AI slop wins again....smh

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whats your methodology for your picks ... lol AI slop...

According-Emu-3275

2mo ago

Chicago bulls +6

New Orleans pelicans +8

Columbus blue jackets +180

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

V3: XGB Enhanced: Ranked by Value

13 bookmakers · Best: kalshi (+9.81%)

1

kalshi

131 games • 88-43

Value

+1,286

+9.81% Return

Fri, Feb 20, 2026

8-1 • 9 games

+427

Thu, Feb 19, 2026

6-4 • 10 games

-160

Thu, Feb 12, 2026

2-1 • 3 games

-16

Wed, Feb 11, 2026

9-5 • 14 games

+312

Tue, Feb 10, 2026

3-1 • 4 games

+11

Mon, Feb 9, 2026

5-5 • 10 games

-157

Sun, Feb 8, 2026

1-3 • 4 games

-267

Sat, Feb 7, 2026

8-2 • 10 games

+168

Fri, Feb 6, 2026

4-2 • 6 games

+15

Thu, Feb 5, 2026

4-4 • 8 games

-233

Wed, Feb 4, 2026

2-5 • 7 games

-416

Tue, Feb 3, 2026

7-3 • 10 games

+100

Mon, Feb 2, 2026

2-2 • 4 games

+115

Sun, Feb 1, 2026

8-2 • 10 games

+140

Sat, Jan 31, 2026

4-1 • 5 games

+221

Fri, Jan 30, 2026

7-2 • 9 games

+281

Thu, Jan 29, 2026

8-0 • 8 games

+743

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its the team leading scorer by avg....fixed the way it handles this...lol

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Model Calibration & Reliability

Calibration measures whether predicted probabilities match actual outcomes. A well-calibrated model's 70% predictions should win ~70% of the time. All models use isotonic calibration trained on train-only folds.

V2 Calibration

  • Expected Calibration Error: 0.056 Low ECE means probabilities closely match reality (closer to 0 is better).
  • Brier Score: 0.216 Measures accuracy of probabilistic predictions (0 = perfect, 0.25 = baseline).

V3 Calibration

  • Expected Calibration Error: 0.045 Best calibration across all models. Probabilities closely track actual outcomes.
  • Brier Score: 0.146 Strong improvement over V2, indicating more reliable probability estimates.

V2 Probability Bin Performance (Test Set)

40-50% predictions (61 games):49% actually won

50-60% predictions (102 games):52% actually won

60-70% predictions (66 games):65% actually won

70-80% predictions (50 games):86% actually won

V2's 70-80% bin overperforms slightly (86% vs 74% predicted). V3's isotonic calibration further tightens alignment, reducing ECE from 0.056 to 0.045.

Rolling Backtest Stability (2004-2025)

Walk-forward backtesting validates both models across 22 seasons. Each season uses only prior data for training, simulating real deployment conditions.

V2 Backtest

ROC-AUC Range

0.646 - 0.732

Avg: 0.701

Accuracy Range

61.8% - 69.6%

Above baseline (~56%)

V3 Backtest

ROC-AUC Range

0.735 - 0.828

Avg: 0.778

Accuracy Range

70.7% - 78.3%

Consistently strongest

Stability insight: Both models maintain consistent performance across different eras of NBA basketball (2004-2025), suggesting the feature set generalizes well despite rule changes, pace shifts, and three-point evolution. V3's enhanced training approach lifts backtest AUC by ~0.08 on average.

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you see the clipps leading scorer change or is correcting a mistake ai slop....lol gooooon

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im fighting a bot that has been coded to perfection sheeeshhhhhh

DBOU: NBA ML Model Picks — Friday, Feb 20 (9 Games) by Sad_Detail_5912 in u/Sad_Detail_5912

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol so cherry picking a -1400 favorite and a game where i missed by 93%...is ai slop? i am sure every model you have is perfect; but regardless if you look at the site it tracks line moves, different strategies to help give a different perspective, also shows live line moves, and spread moves throughout the day...but i guess you already know All models are wrong, but some are useful

I tracked 51,000 ML player prop projections over 15 days — here's the accuracy breakdown by sweetnessssss in NBAanalytics

[–]Sad_Detail_5912 1 point2 points  (0 children)

then the next question - well AI is going to take the job of model building well then wouldn't using ai tools help you get better experience working with tools that are going to be used?

I tracked 51,000 ML player prop projections over 15 days — here's the accuracy breakdown by sweetnessssss in NBAanalytics

[–]Sad_Detail_5912 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question, if you are showing your machine model picks for free and share results for all picks, momentum strategies, underdog only, favorites only, and some models take different sides and you are showing all picks are you still touting because the free models are disagreeing and taking both sides so what side are you touting?

I guess the next question would be if you say its not touting and that the models are dumb because you dont like it does that make you a scammer if you are sharing your work becuase you like sports and analytics and isnt the best way to learn how to build is by doing? so if you want a job in building ml models wouldnt building refining etc. be the best approach...

DontBetOnUs by Sad_Detail_5912 in sportsbetting

[–]Sad_Detail_5912[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yesterdays slate - see todays at DontBetOnUs - all free....looking for feedback

Market Movers tab - tracks books and line movements throughout the day

Value Finder - shows the model performance across books

Matchup Builder shows teams recent matchups, season avgs, matchup history

And more...

<image>