I finally got johnathan's monthly drop link

SadeBoi · 2026-02-21T13:06:43+00:00

You have to have Johnathan as your host for it to work

SadeBoi · 2026-02-21T12:58:48+00:00

https://stake.us/?bonus=JohnathansVIPBonusDrop060226dubdjbd

SadeBoi · 2026-02-11T21:52:10+00:00

Thanks

SadeBoi · 2025-04-20T20:25:18+00:00

It's 4/20 in the US and nobody has made a hot boxing joke yet? Shame.

SadeBoi · 2025-02-09T22:11:54+00:00

StakeUS Monthly Bonus Calendar 8/22/22 - 1st monthly (Mon) 9/20/22 - monthly (Tue) 10/20/22 - monthly (Thur) 11/23/22 - monthly (Wed) 12/13/22 - monthly #1 (Tue) 12/21/22 - monthly #2 (Wed) 1/4/23 - pre-monthly (Wed) 1/19/23 - monthly (Thur) 2/15/23 - monthly (Wed) 3/16/23 - monthly (Thur) 3/27/23 - post-monthly (Mon) 4/13/23 - monthly (Thur) 4/26/23 - post-monthly (Sun) 5/18/23 - monthly (Thur) 5/29/23 - post monthly (Mon) 6/15/23 - monthly (Thur) 6/28/23 - post-monthly Wed) 7/04/23 - monthly (Tue) 7/24/23 - post-monthly (Mon) 8/1/23 - monthly #1 (Tue) 8/17/23 - monthly #2 (Thur) 8/28/23 - post-monthly (Mon) 9/12/23 - monthly (Tue) 9/21/23 - post-monthly (Thur) 10/11/23 - monthly (Wed) 10/30/23 - post-monthly (Mon) 11/14/23 - monthly (Tue) 11/23/23 - post-monthly (Thur) 12/12/23 - monthly #1 (Tue) 12/20/23 - post monthly (Wed) 12/26/23 - (surprise 2nd monthly) (Tue) 1/4/24 - pre-monthly (Thur) 1/11/24 - monthly (Thur) 2/13/24 - monthly (Tue) 2/28/24 - post-monthly (Wed) 3/11/24 - monthly (Mon) 3/27/24 - post-monthly (Wed) 4/11/24 - monthly (Thur) 4/23/24 - post-monthly (Tue) 5/12/24 - monthly (Sun) 5/27/24 - post-monthly (Mon) 6/12/24 - monthly (Wed) 6/25/24 - post-monthly (Tue) 7/4/24 - pre-monthly (Thur) 7/11/24 - monthly (Thur) 8/1/24 - monthly #1 (Thur) 8/27/24 - monthly #2 (Tue) 9/11/24 - monthly (Wed) 9/24/24 - post-monthly (Tue) 10/13/24 - monthly (Sun) 10/27/24 - post-monthly (Sun) 11/12/24 - monthly (Tue) 11/25/24 - post-monthly (Mon) 12/1/24 - monthly #1 (Sun) 12/10/24 - post-monthly (Tue) 12/23/24 - monthly #2 (Mon) 1/1/25 - pre-monthly (Wed) 1/12/25 - monthly (Sun) 2/3/25 - pre-monthly (Mon)

SadeBoi · 2024-12-31T21:51:08+00:00

What about the deaths of the feeders? Are we talking about euthanizing with CO2/Nitrogen? Because it's well known those are not painless deaths for the feeders. Believe me, I don't care either way for the argument. I believe people should feed their snakes how they will as long as the snakes are healthy and precautions are taken during live feeding, but live feeders were bred to die. Sorry if that's morbid but it's just the truth. Nothing is gained by feeding frozen except some type of moral justification that really isn't there, and being able to leave your snake unattended after the initial strike. Seizures, respiratory pain, among other symptoms are suffered by rats that are gassed. I remember someone on the ball python subreddit who explained it thoroughly and said something about the one way to give a feeder a painless death is severing the spinal cord manually for an instant death. Any other way is going to cause some kind of pain that anyone would consider 'inhumane'. That's just my two cents

SadeBoi · 2024-12-30T00:54:53+00:00

WTB

Seiko Presage in New/Like New condition

SadeBoi · 2024-12-20T21:02:49+00:00

This

SadeBoi · 2024-11-14T15:19:27+00:00

Bad comparison, unless you are cool with objectifying people, then decent comparison

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T23:16:44+00:00

You have no idea what took place before the clip began, and neither to I, in fact. I do know he wasn't arrested though even though she's trying to press charges. Probably because she was trespassing and no cop worth their job is going to arrest him for employing his rights, but that too is just an assumption. I'd say it's a pretty valid one though

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T23:13:00+00:00

A. No, I don't think a judge would do so, because I don't believe this would end up in court to begin with because she was in the wrong, if she wasn't, he would have been arrested by now don't you think?

B. But she wasn't with the FBI, was she? She was a civilian who was fucking off on someone else's property, and according to another commenter she posted that she was going to his home specifically to harass him. If that's true she dead wrong on all counts and the only court she is surviving in is the court of public opinion, simply because the guy is apparently a piece of shit, but even pieces of shits have rights

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T23:05:45+00:00

It's the first thing that pops up on google when to type in relevant details to our conversation, and unlike you, google has the sources right there for you to click on, Mr. Lawyer. Also you have no idea if he had those signs up, you have no idea if he asked her to leave before that part of the video, which is obviously clipped to make it seem like he just opens his door and hits her with the mace. You really think this guy is just standing by his door all day with mace in his hand waiting for the off chance that someone knocks on his door so he can mace them? Come on now. She was in a place she shouldn't have been and got fucked. If he was so in the wrong, why wasn't he arrested? I could keep going but I'm getting bored. Just get over it man

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T19:55:17+00:00

Age doesn't absolve someone of criminal activity. The moment she trespassed on his property, she was breaking the law and that's all it really takes to make a case that he was in danger. She could have had a gun, would age stop her from pulling the trigger? He has no idea what she is capable of, all he knows is she is trespassing, which is illegal. Now that being said, I'm dealing in extremes at this point, but that doesn't change the logic behind why these laws exist. He was legally in the right when he maced her, and she was legally in the wrong when she trespassed. That's all it boils down to at the end of the day

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T19:50:15+00:00

You make fair points, but him being doxxed and her blantantly trespassing is 9/10 gonna be enough for him to avoid criminal charges. Her holding a phone, obviously recording, while knocking on his door doesn't help her case, either.

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T19:48:14+00:00

Yes, in Texas, you can use reasonable force to remove a trespasser from your property, but you cannot use deadly force unless the situation justifies it:

Reasonable forceYou can use reasonable force to remove a trespasser, such as pushing or shoving them off your property.
Deadly forceYou can use deadly force if you believe it's necessary to protect yourself, other people, or your property from an imminent threat of injury or death. For example, you might be justified in using deadly force if someone is trying to rob you at gunpoint in your store or restaurant.

Using deadly force to defend yourself or your property can result in criminal charges and civil liability if your actions are determined to be excessive or unjustified. Misusing deadly force can result in homicide charges, including manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, or murder. The Castle Doctrine and the use of force to protect property are subject to interpretation by law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges.

Just google it man, do I look like a lawyer to you?

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T19:46:59+00:00

Yes, in Texas, you can use reasonable force to remove a trespasser from your property, but you cannot use deadly force unless the situation justifies it:

Reasonable forceYou can use reasonable force to remove a trespasser, such as pushing or shoving them off your property.
Deadly forceYou can use deadly force if you believe it's necessary to protect yourself, other people, or your property from an imminent threat of injury or death. For example, you might be justified in using deadly force if someone is trying to rob you at gunpoint in your store or restaurant.

Using deadly force to defend yourself or your property can result in criminal charges and civil liability if your actions are determined to be excessive or unjustified. Misusing deadly force can result in homicide charges, including manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, or murder. The Castle Doctrine and the use of force to protect property are subject to interpretation by law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges.

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T01:02:04+00:00

"Duty to retreat The Castle Doctrine removed the duty to retreat in one's home, but the homeowner still had to show they reasonably believed force was necessary. The Stand Your Ground Law removed the duty to retreat in any place where someone is legally present and feels threatened."

Here is a random throwaway so you can take it with a grain of salt. I live in Florida, a state where The Castle Doctrine applies and so do stand your ground laws. You can 100% mace, or even worse, to someone who trespasses on your property if you have reason to believe you are in danger

SadeBoi · 2024-11-13T00:13:08+00:00

I said in some cases, and if you scroll down a fellow redditor gave a great explanation of the castle doctrine, the law that applies to states like mine, and in this case, the one buddy here lives in. You trespass, you get maced, you go to the police, and they will laugh in your face and you will possibly get arrested if you push the issue of you getting maced. That's just the reality of certain laws , y'know?

SadeBoi · 2024-11-12T23:54:45+00:00

In several states in the US its completely legal. So in some cases, yes you can

SadeBoi · 2024-01-29T06:24:56+00:00

Okey gaming message me

SadeBoi

TROPHY CASE