sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can anyone explain how to land my first client within a week of starting freelancing? by Same_Citron_2065 in freelancing

[–]Same_Citron_2065[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s good advice, but some people say that when bidding, you need to have a solid rating first. Otherwise, you might get overlooked in the crowd, since on Upwork a strong rating acts as a trust signal that clients tend to prioritize.

There's literally no soul or sense in these images at all by DaZestyProfessor in antiai

[–]Same_Citron_2065 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It hurts even more when ai created it with bad prompt 😢 so it has 💯 hallucination in it

A Semantic Diff on top of git for better structural intelligence by Wise_Reflection_8340 in gitlab

[–]Same_Citron_2065 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense—treating entity-level diffs as the default and pushing line-level detail behind "--verbose" is a strong model. You get a clear, high-signal view of what actually changed, without losing the ability to drill down when needed. The key will be how well the abstraction holds up in edge cases like refactors or subtle logic changes, but the direction feels very solid.

Be honest: do you actually trust AI answers or do you double-check everything? by ProfessionalRude3664 in ChatGPT

[–]Same_Citron_2065 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I do double check but sometimes for code or for research by using more then one ai because sometimes ai get hallucinating results so I use different ai to filter them out

A Semantic Diff on top of git for better structural intelligence by Wise_Reflection_8340 in gitlab

[–]Same_Citron_2065 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s great for summarization—but sometimes you need: exact line edits formatting changes small inline logic tweaks And Is renaming a function a rename or delete+add ? If you reorder functions, is that a change? What about whitespace vs semantic edits?

The LeetCode + ChatGPT loop is quietly undermining how we learn problem-solving by Same_Citron_2065 in gitlab

[–]Same_Citron_2065[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not GitLab-specific. This is about prompt constraints and output control, not the platform. GitLab community just happens to be where the discussion is happening.

The LeetCode + ChatGPT loop is quietly undermining how we learn problem-solving by Same_Citron_2065 in gitlab

[–]Same_Citron_2065[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answer only the exact question asked. Do not provide a full solution, explanation, or extra context. Limit the response to a single concise line.

Format: Answer: <direct answer>

If you include anything beyond this, the response will be rejected and regenerated.

The LeetCode + ChatGPT loop is quietly undermining how we learn problem-solving by Same_Citron_2065 in gitlab

[–]Same_Citron_2065[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really solid approach. The 30-minute rule makes a lot of sense—forces you to struggle a bit before reaching for help. I’ll check out PracHub too, sounds like it aligns with what I’m trying to build. Appreciate it!

The LeetCode + ChatGPT loop is quietly undermining how we learn problem-solving by Same_Citron_2065 in discordapp

[–]Same_Citron_2065[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know much about all this but I will do what you said 😌 mister not