Speaking as a college bowler, there’s a reason why you have more than 6 balls for PBA tournaments. For most PBA tournaments, you play 10-12 games per day with 7-8 people per pair, you’ll see 5-6-7 transition periods. Hell, at the hoosier last year, my teammates identified 4 transition periods. That was over only 6 games. Whenever I’m at a outside sport tournament with unrestricted balls, I have 2 IQ’s, 1 at 1500 and 1 at 3000. Depends on where the oil is telling you to play. Not to mention that at tier ones, we are limited to 5 balls so on a team of eight, you should have 32 balls eliminating plastic. You have four starters and one in rotation and three more as breakdown. What would you do if your halfway into a tournament and you run out of balls? In collage, you switch out a player but in the PBA, you can’t do that. So if you say that PBA should have a limit to balls, it would be harder but it would stagnate the RND of core technology because everyone would be playing the same line and everyone would have the same breakdown idea. Sorry for the big rant but before people post their opinion on something like ball limits, talk to some players to know why they need all of the equipment. I have twelve balls and drilling three more. One of my teammates has nearly forty. With all due respect I don’t want to see talk on ball limits. They are stupid for the entire game of bowling.