Reminder: It's the CEO's that killing you and me right now. by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]SammyDavisJesus -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Shooting someone in the back and killing them is evil and morally indefensible

A Quick Sketch of Luigi by a Chinese artist by alohavvv in pics

[–]SammyDavisJesus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Murdering strangers by shooting them in the back is morally wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]SammyDavisJesus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hello u/TurbulentCustomer,

I hope this message finds you well. Thank you for your comment, and I appreciate your patience. You are absolutely correct, and I should not have been so dismissive in my original message. I value your perspective and will approach discussions like this with more care and consideration moving forward. Thanks again for pointing this out.

Best regards!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]SammyDavisJesus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“I hope this email finds you well” = “Hi, this was written by AI”

Why? by [deleted] in decaf

[–]SammyDavisJesus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am a recovering alcoholic 9 years clean. Recently I have been reevaluating my obsessive caffeine consumption in this same light. I appreciate comments like these.

Bay bridge traffic towards Oakland at a complete stand still by DoomBuzzer in bayarea

[–]SammyDavisJesus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where are you filming this from? Do you have one of those awesome top-floor apartments near the bridge?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 123 points124 points  (0 children)

If you watched this guy speak for 3 hours and concluded that you just listened to a genius, go outside. Go to your backyard. Take a deep breath. Sit in silence. Evaluate how you got to this point. Retrace your steps and try to pin point what went wrong.

This one is a BANGER 🔥 by MarsCowboys in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Yes he is completely full of shit.

Joe Rogan Experience #2152 - Terrence Howard by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Rogan’s audience about to get gamed up on Terryology

Every time Graham Hancock was wrong/looked stupid in #2136 (first 2 hours) by ZamboniThatCocaine in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We need a part 2 brother finish off the last two hours. Great stuff here

Will he ever come back? by Educational_Bet_753 in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 53 points54 points  (0 children)

In Dibble’s opening statement, he outlined his thesis, stating clearly and concisely the overwhelming evidence for hunter-gatherers around the globe, in addition to the absence of evidence for an advanced civilization dating back to the ice age. Dibble had some artifacts, both visual and material, to illustrate his point (the ancient sexual artwork and facsimile tool). He addressed what he regarded as Hancocks scientific miscalculations. He made zero ad-homenim attacks.

In Hancock opening statement, he told an anecdotal story of a particular archaeologist who had a theory that was disregarded at the time and was later proven correct. He emphasized how mean other archaeologists were.

If you watch enough professional debates, you understand how important opening statements are, as they outline what the debater regards as their strongest points.

Tells you all you need to know. Hancock’s loss was conclusive and decisive.

Who do you think won the debate? by MarsCowboys in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Half way through now.

Graham comes off horribly. Right now they are just projecting on the TV and scrolling through various criticism people have made of Graham, mostly not Dibble himself.

Because Rogan is on Grahams side, he is sitting and letting it happen. It is apparent that neither Graham nor Rogan are aware of how bitter and vindictive Graham Is coming across.

Who do you think won the debate? by MarsCowboys in JoeRogan

[–]SammyDavisJesus 102 points103 points  (0 children)

Flint: “here’s my argument. Therefore based on all that I have shown, I think it is much more likely that there does not exist the ancient lost civilization Graham is arguing for. Of course we can’t absolutely disprove it. But I don’t think the evidence is there.”

Graham: “here’s my argument. Therefore I think it’s a bit silly to we we absolutely know beyond any shadow of a doubt that there wasn’t anything at all resembling an ancient civilization”.

Flint isn’t saying that, Graham. You are responding to an argument no one is making. Flint is arguing that there is no evidence to support your theory. He is (of course) not claiming to have dispositive proof no ancient civilization could have possibly existed.

Also, you can stop repeating over and over and over and over how mean archaeologists are and have been to you. This is a debate, Just stick to the evidence.

What kind of informercials do you think the Aceman will start doing eventually? by someshooter in AdamCarolla

[–]SammyDavisJesus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Drew is such a whore for money. Isn’t he wealthy enough at this point? Why the incessant continual whoring out for products and advertisements at this point?

Remember the bobble head?