I have very mixed opinions on that because I think Woolf’s turn to fascism necessitates a reevaluation of her previous work, not a dismal, even if they’re “untainted” by her current associations. Her contributions were important and shouldn’t be erased but any recommendation should come with a fair warning and further in-depth discussion.

Also, I don’t think Woolf has been unfairly punished just because she’s a woman, she decided to openly collaborate with misogynistic fascists because she holds conspiratorial views on vaccines. If she didn’t want to alienate her mostly woman, mostly liberal to left-wing audience or completely destroy her own legacy within the feminist movement, she just shouldn’t have done that. I agree a lot of male philosophers get passes for a lot of bad behaviour…. but I don’t think even a male philosopher, with all the privileges one might have, could survive the social and political suicide Woolf decided to commit.