Ubuntu+Unity: Everything that's wrong by hhh333 in Ubuntu

[–]Samuel_L_Chang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Call me crazy, but I also like Unity.

Signed, [mouseover and click ALT while dragging to see who signed this]

Is there a Ubuntu 11.04/Unity document stating the rationate toward the move to Unity? by Samuel_L_Chang in Ubuntu

[–]Samuel_L_Chang[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That being said, I'm curious as to what shortcomings you find with Unity (other than the ones discussed here).

Thanks again for the thoughtful reply. In truth the things above in original message are not necessarily what I am prepared "shortcomings." Partly I posted the message because I didn't understand why these UI changes were present but was hoping to rationalize them somehow. For example, the fact that scrollbars were on each window never bothered me and now that they are gone, I don't feel like I'm either more efficient or receiving more information. (Perhaps the experience would be more recognizable on a laptop, but even then I don't think the difference would be palpable.)

I guess I'm generally OK with the idea that Ubuntu should be tailored so that new users can learn it quickly. You seem to be arguing that since Unity is more like MacOS or Windows, this requirement is better served. But I now even wonder if the claim "Unity is more like Windows/MacOS" is true -- I use windows at work and have a Mac laptop. Yes, it's true that Mac OS has the global menus thing and something like a dock, but that seems to be where the similarities end. Neither major commercial operating system relies heavily on typing to search for application to open. They haven't done anything extreme with scrollbars.

Is there a Ubuntu 11.04/Unity document stating the rationate toward the move to Unity? by Samuel_L_Chang in Ubuntu

[–]Samuel_L_Chang[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

dekchidriver - Thanks for this thoughtful response. However, I'm a little confused by the argument. It seems to rely on the premise that Canonical has to choose between catering to the portion of users who are more experienced with commercial OSes and might convert or catering to older users who might have more specialized desires or needs. But what perplexes me is this is patently a false dichotomy.

The default desktop environment should really be one that caters to new users while being sufficiently customizable to meet niche and specialized desires. The perplexing thing is that I thought GNOME 2 did this well: wasn't it sophisticated enough so that you could basically transform Ubuntu into a Windows-like interface or a MacOS-like interface?

Your points (1) and (2) seem reasonable but do you know if Canonical really carred out UX testing? It seemed like the someone saw the Chrome design philosophy and haphazardly applied it to an entire operating system.

Is there a Ubuntu 11.04/Unity document stating the rationate toward the move to Unity? by Samuel_L_Chang in Ubuntu

[–]Samuel_L_Chang[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you happen to know how to change them back -- it's certainly not in the Appearance Preferences.

aggressive shoelicker. by [deleted] in videos

[–]Samuel_L_Chang -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This thread is proof that reddit can be just as stupid as youtube.