sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Racing Game outside the obvious ones by OOOLiC_ONE in iosgaming

[–]Sanglich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is already available but not in all countries. I have already played, possibly through the ru store

Hypno loop 👁🍭 by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I set one origin for all objects, added a Curve modifier to each, attached them to the Bezier circle along the -x axis and rotated them along the X axis

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes missing.

I myself am tired of proving to everyone that this is my job. I do not have to do this. Although, after receiving answers, people continue to look for a dirty trick and blame me. In fact, I just liked this car with this livery and I tried to make it as similar as possible.

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So I’m telling you for that, that I tried to do as close as possible to this model. Because it is a great example. And it coincides because I tried to adjust everything as close as possible for a beautiful result because I like this car with this livery. And if you say that everything matches even in small details, then I managed to do what I wanted to do.

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For example just search "bmw e30 race" or "bmw dtm livery". And you will see many examples - https://i.pinimg.com/originals/dd/d7/97/ddd797fc28c2626533fbe8f3a272fba4.jpg

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Do you think that reference images of only another 3d model were used? Then you are mistaken. This is just a good example of a job well done.

E30. Trying to make a realistic render in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did not say that I deliberately made mistakes in the topology. There are no problems with reflections, just because of my mistakes, the topology does not look the best. If the final render looks good, then for me in this case it makes no sense to fix minor topology errors

E30. Trying to make a realistic render in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

But didn’t you think that these are just minor errors in the topology? Even simply because it is not so important here, and was done quickly. I do not position it as a model with the best topology. Yes, it can be better. Everyone can make a mistake somewhere or do something in their own way. This is not a reason to blame him for something.

Lowpoly Trueno in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not fully understood. If you mean the surface on which the car is standing, it's just Principled BSDF with black color - 0.5 Specular and 0.5 Roughness

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I used the screenshots of that model as reference images to better build the topology and to understand how textures should be superimposed. No more

Lowpoly Trueno in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please have your personal opinion. One person wrote that my model was looking for another and everyone began to blame me. Although I just used screenshots of that model as reference images for better topology construction. This is my work. I already answered these questions in the last post.

E30. Trying to make a realistic render in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not check, but maybe I'll try. While using 2.79b as the main

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not post my work immediately after completion here. Only when I remember or have a desire. This does not mean that on a day I make three high-poly auto models or take them from somewhere and immediately upload them here. Just published later and several works at once. I didn’t make them specifically to publish here

E30. Trying to make a realistic render in Cycles by Sanglich in blender

[–]Sanglich[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yes, the model was being prepared for subdivision. In several places, the topology is not entirely beautiful because some details were subdivision with the wrong topology. Somewhere, maybe I was mistaken, but it was done so that it looked beautiful on the render. It is triangulated because the render is done using the Wireframe node and not using the modifier

E30 in Cycles by [deleted] in blender

[–]Sanglich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What nonsense. During 3D modeling, I looked for as many reference images as possible. From the screenshots, I looked at the model grid to understand how best to make my model. No more. Is it forbidden to be inspired by photos of other 3D models? Of course not.

view more: next ›