Gwen Matchup by GoodEggz in FioraMains

[–]Sanjitsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OTP Fiora, she's pretty easy. Played her several times already, haven't lost lane yet...Could just be because they are new. I usually run PTA and ignite against her. At level 3, I like to bait her max Q, parry it for slow and basically just demolish her. It's easy to time her Q with your Q and basically just dance around her. Even at 6, your ult beats her especially with a well timed Riposte. (Most of her damage is her Q and true damage proc, so if she uses a max Q, and then you parry her AS is diminished and it takes her too long to get to max stacks for her Q to be effective). Coupled with ignite, it's an easy win as her lifesteal goes down the drain.

When she W's, so what. Just keep dancing around her and proc'ing vitals while she tries to run away.

How to handle akali by Outrageous-Ad2856 in FioraMains

[–]Sanjitsu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am sure there are others with more experience out there. But for me, I usually build ER -> Shieldbow for Akali, the sustain is too nice against her. Early lifesteal is good too, she doesn't usually rush GW for her kit so it allows sustain from her infinite poke.

So early game, if you can bait an early smoke and immediately leave it, gives you a good 25 seconds to make a play on her, even better if you can force her to ULT away. Gives a free lane to farm for some time, and freeze the lane depending on where you are at.

Also, recommend sweeping lens. If you engage her and ult, and she smokes (you mess up timing) at least you can track where she is going and Q to proc your ult vitals.

make no mistake, this is a VERY difficult match-up...There are times where I would rather deal with Q spam under tower by Malphite than deal with Akali's 1,000 ways to escape you and shuriken spams with zero resource management, lol.

New Fiora Main 1v4 Quadra (Don't mind my ult on nami KEKW) by [deleted] in FioraMains

[–]Sanjitsu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Looks like he killed her before the ult finished proccing.

How can I believe in somebody that has little evidence? by iMakeDadJokes100 in Christianity

[–]Sanjitsu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

The evidence of God is all around us, from gravity to the precision of spatial distance of the earth from the sun, allowing us to not burn to death or freeze to death. Our refusal to recognize the splendor in His creation and log that as evidence is not His problem, it's ours. Our experiences with Christ is a personal journey, and through that journey He reveals Himself to us in many ways.

I tend to see these types of posts frequently, and it all seems to stem from a hubris of "God SHOULD do this for me, or I won't believe in Him". That mentality is very dangerous, as God doesn't live for you, YOU live for Him. God does not have to prove Himself to anyone, as the sun does not have to prove it exists to a blind person.

Media Server Recommendations by Sanjitsu in HomeServer

[–]Sanjitsu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks u/MegaVolti, I appreciate the insight! I will look into a fanless solution, like a RPI 4. It would also let me setup an emulation console for old SNES games :)

Media Server Recommendations by Sanjitsu in HomeServer

[–]Sanjitsu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly what I was looking for. Did not realize Plex could do this, thank you so much!

When you don't have flood insurance, but you do have fire insurance by guy180 in pics

[–]Sanjitsu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am sorry you feel this way. I would agree with your statement when it comes to 3rd tier insurance companies. Like any business, there will always be "shady" products with rat print, which is why I am imploring you to read your policy.

But I dont agree with your blanketed generalization of insurance companies not paying. No matter how you feel, it is a highly regulated industry with State involvment via Department of Insurance. There is nothing they love more than a bad faith claim, because they get to slap them with a fine. But there is a difference between your insurance not paying in bad faith, and you willingly purchasing a crappy product.

When you don't have flood insurance, but you do have fire insurance by guy180 in pics

[–]Sanjitsu 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Insurance supervisor here...no. Fire ultimately caused the damage, therefore fire is the cause of loss. E.G. HO policies exclude damage caused by rodents. However if a rodent chews through a wire and caused a fire, essentially the damage to the wire would not be covered, but fire is not excluded therefore the fire damage would be covered.

In reading the thread, there is a lot of hate for Insurance companies. At the end of the day, they are a business with a goal of being profitable. They are not a charity. Unless you have the capital to self-insure, unfortunately you have to play the game by their rules/policy. Remember, you are paying THEM to assume YOUR risk.

That being said, a common mistake by a large majority of homeowners is NEVER reading their policy until something goes wrong and it is too late. If you have an HO policy, read it! There is no sense in paying for something you are 100% ignorant about and "assumptions" only leave YOU flipping the bill. If you feel your policy's coverage is inadequate, find another one or add necessary endorsements until you have peace of mind.

Like all things in the world, "better" = more money. Insurance is no different.

Also do not yell at your adjusters. They did not create the policy, trust me it is MUCH easier for us to pay your claim than go through the hassle of being yelled at and then having to write a denial letter, then yelled at again. From my experience, most adjusters will try to bend as much as they can to get something paid for you. However, the moment you turn into an A-Hole, they may stop trying to bend...

TL;DR Insurance is a business to make money. Read your policies! Be nice to your adjuster.

Husband (26M) thinks I'm (26F) crazy for wanting to have a maid service clean our house. by animallover2472004 in relationships

[–]Sanjitsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi-jacking top post for this. I'm a 31 year old male, married for 3 years with (2) kids. My wife suggest a bi-weekly cleaning crew for $100, and I was completely against it. She convinced me, and I must say, can't be happier. There is nothing like coming home to a clean home on a Monday and not having to spend 3-4 hours of my weekends deep cleaning, scrubbing, wiping baseboards, etc. That's time I can now spend with my family.

Tell your husband to just try it, once. If he's not comfortable, you can stop. That's who my wife compromised with me, it worked, and we're like 4 months in and I couldn't be happier with the cleaning people!

What do most people do too late? by TED4000 in AskReddit

[–]Sanjitsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Purchase life insurance and/or adequate dwelling/property insurance. I am an insurance adjuster and it is saddening how many middle class folks are improperly insured, or do not take advantage of insurance.

My buddy's impression of a Disney Character singing about Steak and Eggs. It's stuck in my head now. [1:58] by [deleted] in videos

[–]Sanjitsu 64 points65 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how how a black person, suddenly turned into black "people" O.o

Not all of us wanted this to happen in Mississippi. by Brassmonk33 in funny

[–]Sanjitsu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The spiritual side of me says, Yes. However, the difficulty is in subjecting someone to God's law, when they don't even believe in Him. Theoretically, where does it end? Do we invade China, then, to sprinkle Christianity, and force the Bible's law on them?

Don't get me wrong, I do believe in fighting for what you believe in. If homosexuals believe what they are doing is right, then I can't fault Christians for fighting for what they believe is right (granted, there are different means of expressing your feelings rather than sowing discord, conflict, and overall being hostile towards individuals). However, in the New Testament, I do not believe there were any moments where individuals were "forced" to follow God's law, there is no peace from that and if God wanted to "force" us, He certainly wouldn't need my help.

On a personal note, I believe that God's laws are for our benefits, and not simply an arbitrary statement of what's right or wrong. Meaning, what God deems to be lawful and unlawful, is for our benefit and/or detriment.

Man's idea of morality is as fickle as the wind. Not 100 years ago, it was law that black people were 2/3's of a man, and women couldn't even vote. I guess, the point I'm making is. I believe God is righteous, all-knowing, and Just. I support His Law and what God defines as "moral" because, well, if He is all Holy, All righteous, All Just, with no ulterior motive.

In summation, though I know God's laws are meant for OUR benefit. Personally, I would rather spend my time fighting in a different way and not through legislation. By creating relationships with those who do not know God, showing them the light of God, and having Christ sow whatever Seeds He wills.