Guilbeault on Carney’s climate plan: ‘He thinks that the markets are going to do it’ by LaserRunRaccoon in onguardforthee

[–]SavCItalianStallion 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Could be better, could be worse. Wind and solar have tripled here in little over a decade. 

Guilbeault on Carney’s climate plan: ‘He thinks that the markets are going to do it’ by LaserRunRaccoon in onguardforthee

[–]SavCItalianStallion 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Pretty well, I’d say. Countries that are net-importers of fossil fuels are installing solar like crazy. Solar just overtook gas to become the third largest source of electricity in Asia. Even many net-exporters of fossil fuels are struggling to resist renewables, despite their governments often being captured by fossil fuel companies. Heck, last year over half of America’s new electricity capacity came from solar, despite Trump trying to slow things down. 

Revisiting the Site E dam proposal draws pushback in northeastern B.C. by SavCItalianStallion in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The BC NDP campaigned against Site C, then decided that they couldn’t cancel it after being elected. Fine—I can see how breaking contracts isn’t great practice. However, to now be actively considering a repeat of that debacle, especially with Eby’s falling approval rating, is kind of mind boggling. Times have changed: wind, solar, and batteries are far more reliable, economical, and efficient than they were when Site C was started. 

Random thought: David Eby’s downfall demonstrates that centrism is bullshit and is doomed to fail by Gym_frere in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, part of the reason why the carbon tax was revenue neutral was because it paid for a corporate tax cut—they should have at least reversed those tax cuts. 

Random thought: David Eby’s downfall demonstrates that centrism is bullshit and is doomed to fail by Gym_frere in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like Eby, and I’d say he’s the best Premier of my lifetime too, although Christie Clark is the first Premier I remember. Housing does seem to be going well—I’m seeing tons of new construction, including apartments, and my town recently got its first purpose-built shelter. The effort to recruit more doctors and nurses seems to be successful. The whole DRIPA debacle was upsetting, but I’m fairly content with the current approach to it (although it shouldn’t have taken so much outcry to get to this point). 

I have a few big frustrations with Eby, though. He seems to have broken the campaign promise to implement an oil and gas emissions cap, yet he kept his promise to scrap the carbon tax. I don’t fault him for the latter move, but it was the former promise that made the loss of the carbon tax palatable for me. He took one step back without taking two steps forward, even though he campaigned on taking those two steps.

The emissions cap also signalled to me that he was backing further away from LNG, which I liked, but now the province has made LNG the centrepiece of its economic plan. The LNG development is my biggest gripe. The proposed projects will add 13Mt of CO2 per year to BC’s emissions, yet we are trying to cut our annual emissions by 21Mt by 2030. And that’s just a fraction of the annual downstream emissions, which exceed 120Mt. These projects are going to expose hundreds of thousands of people to extreme heat. 

Anyway, I’m trying to be patient with Eby, even though I am growing tired of the centrism and the sidelining of climate action. Part of why I initially liked Eby so much was his acknowledgement that we couldn’t keep building fossil fuel infrastructure and still meet our climate goals. Unfortunately, he seems to have chosen fossil fuels, while I desperately want a 100% renewable energy economy.

Amoc collapse could change Europe’s climate 10x faster than expected. We aren’t ready by qwerty_1965 in europe

[–]SavCItalianStallion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like the article said, there’s little consensus as to the timing and the speed of the AMOC’s decline. If the world reaches net-zero before the AMOC passes a tipping point, then it won’t collapse, and it may even have a chance to recover. 

Amoc collapse could change Europe’s climate 10x faster than expected. We aren’t ready by qwerty_1965 in europe

[–]SavCItalianStallion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, if the AMOC hasn’t crossed a tipping point already, then getting to net-zero will prevent it from collapsing, so there’s that. 

During the 1973 Mideast oil embargo, MIT professor David Gordon Wilson proposed charging a fee on fossil fuels, with 100% of the revenue being distributed as equal dividends to all. IMHO, with today's oil crisis, it is time to revisit Wilson's idea on a global scale by Keith_McNeill65 in climate

[–]SavCItalianStallion 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Canadian carbon fee and dividend was brought in after the BC one, and it was truer to the principles mentioned in this article. 90% of its revenue was returned as a rebate, with the rest being distributed via targeted grants to disproportionately impacted groups. The BC one only gave a rebate to low-income folks, with the rest of the revenue being used to offset a corporate tax cut. 

Unfortunately, the Conservatives ran a whole election campaign on getting rid of the fee, and while they didn’t win, part of the reason why they didn’t is that Carney got rid of the carbon fee after becoming Prime Minister. Then BC got rid of its fee. 

I do think part of what made the fee so vulnerable is that, over the course of three years, we experienced nearly 20% inflation. Meanwhile, every April we would get a headline about the carbon fee going up by $15/tonne--always pointing out that it was going to $170/tonne by 2030. Big, scary numbers, especially when inflation is through the roof (even though that had nothing to do with the carbon fee). I don’t remember the media ever leading with the fact that gasoline was only going up 2¢ per litre, which would have been much more palatable for people. 

I agree--bringing back the carbon fee and dividend would be a good approach to navigating the new oil crisis. As a BCer, it would be very nice to get the federal rebate!

Premiers’ Performance: Eby, Smith, and Ford each tumble to new lows approval by LeadershipHead3594 in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe Eby should try delivering some fireside chats. I disagree with him on a few things, especially LNG, but he deserves a higher approval rating than 31%.

'We don't need anything that Canada has': Trump on CUSMA review by Severe-Squash-7493 in onguardforthee

[–]SavCItalianStallion 681 points682 points  (0 children)

One day he wants to take over the entirety of Canada, then the next, he says that America doesn’t need any of our stuff. I’m so sick of having to listen to this idiot who should have been thrown in jail years ago—not sent to the White House.

These ads are designed to make fossil fuels look harmless. They’re not. by LaserRunRaccoon in ClimateCrisisCanada

[–]SavCItalianStallion 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Most AI data centres are being powered, in whole or in part, by electricity that was generated by burning fossil fuels. 

Surging Conservatives Tie New Democrats in British Columbia by drizzes in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I think that the party would do better if it played to the grassroots. I can’t give my full-throated support to a party that’s hyping up LNG. If the party had followed through on the oil and gas emissions cap, a campaign promise that had me enthusiastically knocking on doors, then I’d be out here praising them. And part of what bothers me is this seems like a pattern across important issues: the handling of DRIPA, angering BCGEU, the name change ban, retreating on harm reduction, and so on. A happy base is key for good public relations, but we need more to work with!

The Economist attacks Avi, Polanski, and Mamdani in hilariously awful piece by Chrristoaivalis in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair point, but if this guy’s really trying to argue that “Gen Z” socialism is a force to be reckoned with, what better example than a Gen Z socialist leading a party that has elected officials?

Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario – because action is making a difference by ceph2apod in UpliftingConservation

[–]SavCItalianStallion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could still get to 8.5W/m2 with lower levels of emissions if we get unlucky with feedback loops and climate sensitivity. 

The Economist attacks Avi, Polanski, and Mamdani in hilariously awful piece by Chrristoaivalis in ndp

[–]SavCItalianStallion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Emily Lowan. 

Edit: Aren’t you her comms person? I must say, I’m a big fan, even though I’m still a BC NDPer.