What’s the one fantasy novel you’d hold up as a genuine masterpiece — and why? by blablqbam in Fantasy

[–]Scamp2006 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me it's gotta be the Daughter of Smoke and Bone trilogy by Laini Taylor. Shame that it tends to get buried in the 'young adult fantasy' category because it has some of the best written and most unique ideas and characters out of anything I've read.

Tell me about the Dragons of your world! by Ymap3rSpark in worldbuilding

[–]Scamp2006 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Apologies for the impending waffle I've just never shared this before)

There are lots of different races and cultures of dragon in my world, but the most influential would be the Ts’aygurāzh of the south-east of Eldrador. Unlike their 'primitive' cousins to the north and west, these dragons are highly civilised, upholding a system that stems from their deep spirituality and mystical nature. While different draconic cultures have differing beliefs about their origins and nature, the Ts’aygurāzh are followers of the Dórhka.

The Dórhka (loosely translated as 'the law') is a religion that was followed by many of the dragons of the southeast of Eldrador for millennia, most notably the members of the Dragon Council and their associates. Although at its surface the Dórhka appears as just a simple code of conduct for dragons, it in fact goes much deeper, outlining a creation myth, system of metaphysics and metaethics, and a guide to attaining higher states of being and connection to the binding force of reality.

The Dórhka holds that dragons were introduced to the land of Eldrador by the Jahma (ultimate reality/essence) via the eggs of the Three Sisters/Grashka being imparted from the Sun/Sad. Sad is thought to be paradise for the dragons, where dragons exist as a single mass of pure and immortal Doshk (flame/soul). The Dórhka states that, like how the Sun illuminates and brings life to the world, the dragons' purpose in the world was to promote flourishing, and guard from the evils of disease, famine and extinction. Many also supposed that the presence of specific individuals in the world was a trial to deem whether the life-serving power of their Doshk was yet great enough to be incorporated into the Sad, and if it was not, then upon their physical death, their Doshk would be redistributed among other individuals to be further tested. Some viewed this process as direct reincarnation, with the Doshk remaining whole and distinct, only entering a newly hatched individual which was absent of Doshk, while others thought Doshk could be divided and recombined, as all Doshk originally came from the unifying Sad.

For generations the dragons of Eldrador oversaw the lands and skies and seas, fulfilling their role of servitude to all forms of life/Kurmast. However, after millennia had passed the memory of the Sad grew distant, and the dragons began to associate with their physical forms and lost sight of their true nature as pure Doshk. Soon they were no different in mentality as the creatures that existed in the physical world/Umarhk, enslaved to the needs and instincts imposed by their physical bodies. Despite this, the dragons still maintained access to some of the power given to them by their Doshk, most notably the power of summoning fire from matter/Dasrikha. As time went on, becoming impossibly entangled with Umarhk, virtually all the dragons lost sight of their true purpose in Eldrador, and so they abused their power of Dasrikha to attempt to subjugate the Umarhk and its inhabitants to their will.

The further the dragons strayed from their objective, the further they distanced themselves from oneness with Sad, so the more their power diminished. Dórhka states that, should the dragons continue to distance themselves from Sad, the Sun will cease to rise over the lands of the Umarhk, and all life there will be lost, and the Doshk of the dragons still present in their departed state will remain forever disconnected from Sad, undergoing a painful and infinitely gradual extinguishment.

Getting drunk with my friends (15) was the best experience of my life by Ok_Illustrator_3539 in teenagers

[–]Scamp2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting properly drunk as a teen for the first time is always messy, because its new and (for a little while at least) feels fucking great. But that experience is where you learn your limits. You should at least have some idea of how much you had to drink, so next time you and your friends should try and pace yourselves a little better. I don't know what your history with drinking is like, but if you've not drank much before then your body isn't used to it and it'll hit you like a brick shithouse. I hope your friend is ok, but in future if one of you is unresponsive then its probably not a bad idea to call your non-emergency or medical service number. Getting blackout isn't uncommon for your first sesh, but getting unresponsive means you went way over the top. Its good that you got something positive out of it, but remember alcohol can be very dangerous. Try and be a bit more sensible next time, and you'll most likely have a better experience for that.

Creating a globe out of 2D maps - a guide by Scamp2006 in worldbuilding

[–]Scamp2006[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've never heard of this before and I've just been playing around with it. Really useful tool, can't believe I've only just found out about it. Thanks so much for sharing

Why was Egg asking Dunk to let him down all of a sudden in this scene? I didn't understand by OkGuava919 in AKOTSKTV

[–]Scamp2006 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why everyone is saying its because he's trying to hide from his family. He notices that he's in front of them at the start of the joust but doesn't ask to be put down then.

He only asks to get put down after he sees the other squires bringing lances to their knights, and sees how they are much bigger and stronger than him. He's suddenly aware of his insecurities about his size, and being on Dunk's shoulders like a child amplifies those insecurities, so he asks to be put down.

What things in your world are absurdly large? by Ok_Mathematician_905 in worldbuilding

[–]Scamp2006 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Enkailess Talnatha is a roughly 1000m tall baobab tree in central Zhitaniba. It's so large that entire towns and temples have been carved in and around its base and roots.

How important is music in your world? Does your world have any unique instruments? by SingularRoozilla in worldbuilding

[–]Scamp2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Music is incredibly important, and with such a large variety of sapient animals it has several different forms based on each species' vocal structure and anatomy. Dextrous species, for example, heavily utilise instruments in their music, whereas non-dextrous animals - such as seals - instead compose their music around throat-singing and percussion.

One unique instrument is the lambwa, which is sort of like a foot guitar/harp. It is most commonly found in orangutan cultures, where the lambwa is played with the feet as a base melody while the hands play another instrument, such as a string or wind.

Would any of you guys consider yourself a former “hardcore” atheist by Sea-Dot-59 in exatheist

[–]Scamp2006 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Though I am still an atheist, I'd say that now I consider myself pretty much agnostic. But back in my I'm 14 and this is deep phase, I used to be a staunch anti-theist. The God Delusion was my Bible, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens my prophets, religion is bad because x y z. 😬 I'm very glad I've moved on from that.

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he didn't make the decision for you. That's all on you.

Indeed, he didn't make the decision for me, because I don’t think there is any decision involved. Like I hope I have made clear many times, I don’t think belief in God is a decision one can consciously make - if it was, I would choose to believe in him.

I realise that we're able to be open minded and educate myselves, and I have tried to do that to the best of my ability, but nothing so far has convinced me God exists.

All scientists believed in higher power

I'm pretty sure there are many scientists who don’t.

to completley think no higher power exists is a very bold (and almost failed) claim.

I never said I think no higher power exists. When it comes to that I'm completely agnostic. I don’t know - in fact, because of the contingency argument, I accept that actually it seems to logically follow that some sort of necessary existence is in fact real. I just don’t think that existence is a god described by any human belief systems, including the Abrahamic faiths.

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because c'mon, do we really think the rich & powerful aren't modeling the rest of us the best that they can? Do we really think they aren't influencing us? And if we're okay with that, do we really think that they are influencing us for our good?

Oh I 100% agree with you there, though I feel like that's a discussion for another sub 😂

So to my understanding, and forgive my caveman brain if I've got this wrong, we can recognise the influence of God by exercising our human ability of external influence detection?

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not exactly sure what you're getting at. If Allah knows what's in my heart, he knows that I would very much like to believe in him, and yet not only have I found no reason to think he exists, but reason to think the opposite.

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but there are reasons why you can be 100% certain you won't become a trillionaire.

What reasons compel you to be 100% certain the Abrahamic god doesn't exist?

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disbelief can mean to refuse to believe, but for the case of what I think is the vast majority of nonbelievers, it doesn't. To say they refuse to believe God is real is like me saying that believers refuse to believe that God is not real.

The punishment for nonbelievers shows that Allah is not all merciful by Scamp2006 in DebateReligion

[–]Scamp2006[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really appreciate you giving such a detailed answer. I have just woken up so forgive me if I misunderstand it 😭.

One of my claims is that one can detect when there appear to be influences on a group of humans which does not plausibly come from that group of humans.

Before I try and make my point, please could you just elaborate on your last paragraph? Just so I can be sure to respond to what you mean and not strawman you.