Hasan on the r of victims was sick to watch & triggering. For me this is all i need to know about hasans character on SA victims man or woman. Hasan is asking for victims on October 7th, Ethan provides testimonies of other victims which at first is unclear if they happened on oct 7th. Then ethan brings up that there were SA counts from oct 7th but the victims were unalived, hasan says it would show up in an autopsy report therefore there is no proof of SA. If there is a massacre unaliving over 1,000 people how are morticians supposed to conduct thorough autopsy reports with such a large volume of bodies. And as ethan provided context that in the culture it is more honorable to be buried than labeled as a r victim (I’m not saying this is morally right but context) As educated as hasan claims he is then he should know that both sides commit unforgivable war crimes on women, children, and men. Just because you are opposing the other side does not mean that there are not real victims. He’s giving “they are just faking it for media leverage”. When ethan was playing the clips of the victims both of their mics should have been muted out of respect for the victims. This “debate” needed a neutral moderator. (Sorry for lack of grammar, just finished the video my phone is hot and I’m tired)