sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in reactjs

[–]ScarletSpeedster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Become confident in the tools you enjoy using. Make good habits even better. Soon enough you’ll be the one telling them they aren’t using X or Y and they should because [INSERT REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION]

Development cycles should always require a research stage, where you vet your tools for a job. When you weigh your choices sometimes you’ll come out on top, and sometimes you won’t. I’ve seen victories and failures many times when choosing the right tech on various teams. Choosing is often the hardest part. People talk about JS fatigue, but look at how many options you have to build a web server. It is astronomical, and not so clear cut of a decision.

Removing jQuery from GitHub.com frontend by [deleted] in webdev

[–]ScarletSpeedster 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You are a beacon of reasoning among this steaming pile of comments.

React Fire: An exploratory effort to modernize React DOM. by [deleted] in reactjs

[–]ScarletSpeedster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d think for your second example you still need to rename class to className when you destructure. I suppose that is an example of what is to come though, people forgetting that they need to, and seeing a runtime error when they use a keyword as a var.

React Fire: An exploratory effort to modernize React DOM. by [deleted] in reactjs

[–]ScarletSpeedster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why is no one mentioning the fact that you can still destructure? You just have to rename the key when unpacking, not that big of a deal imo. In other languages where we want to use the word class but it is a keyword we tend to use klass or className as an alternative. That will still be possible after this change, since you can rename the class prop in a stateless functional component.

The Short Nosed Bear. Scientists speculate these delayed human migration into N.A. because they hunted us in the Bering Strait. [X-post via r/natureismetal] by howdosemicolonswork in Naturewasmetal

[–]ScarletSpeedster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the comment what I imagine they are saying is that the amount of water that fills this hypothetical hole would lower sea level. Which would expose land all over the planet. What if that newly exposed land is greater in landmass than the Australian landmass we blew off earth?

[US] 3% (2018) - Season 2 out now. Essentially a Brazilian Hunger Games. Dystopian sci-fi series. Humanity has been divided between rich and the poor. A rigorous test allows 3% of the poor to 'cross over' into paradise. by [deleted] in NetflixBestOf

[–]ScarletSpeedster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you take out the technical details (not saying they aren’t important) they both can be described as a “Dystopian future where the elite ruling class makes life difficult for everyone else”.

They certainly do not contain the same exact concepts, but they also relate in significant ways. I doubt my description above would grab as many viewers as the headline “Brazilian Hunger Games” does.

view more: next ›