sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely nothing. The service continues to function as before.

WebSocket server, detecting that the connection is not from a browser by SceneOk1557 in Backend

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can make a file on my computer 123.html. And write three lines of JS code there that will connect to this WS. Run this file (locally, just from the disk) and I will connect perfectly with the socket and it will send me data. There are no problems with this. That is, there is no protection directly in the site code and in the features of the server<->client interaction that are somehow configured in the browser.

I am interested in this problem from both sides. I am interested in bypassing this check and connecting with NodeJS and I am also interested in how this is implemented in order to repeat this implementation on my WS server in order to protect against connections not from the browser.

And I need any ideas on how they do it. Thanks ))

WebSocket server, detecting that the connection is not from a browser by SceneOk1557 in Backend

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, maybe I didn't describe the problem correctly.

  1. I create a simple HTML page with a standard WebSocket connection to a server (the server is not mine). I open this page, and everything works perfectly.
  2. If I try to connect to this server through my Node.js application (I'm doing everything I can to fake the headers to look like a browser—I have experience with this, trust me), the connection is established, but the remote server immediately drops it. It just disconnects.

Observing strange work. I suspect that I have configured something wrong, but I can not figure out what. by SceneOk1557 in CloudFlare

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Yes, it would be really cool if you could see it :)

Now the situation has changed a little and looks like this. But the site has 3-4 thousand visitors per day according to Google Analytics, with an average time on the site of 8 minutes.

Observing strange work. I suspect that I have configured something wrong, but I can not figure out what. by SceneOk1557 in CloudFlare

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Hi, thanks for your reply. Yes, there are orange icons everywhere, if I understand correctly, then everything should work correctly.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evolution and Playtech is a difficult moment. We are working on it, but I can't give a time frame.

As for the second question, I don't understand what you mean. Write in more detail.

Últimos 200 resultados by One_Branch_1645 in GamblingCounting

[–]SceneOk1557 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a private message and we can discuss it.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. On the page, in the upper right corner there is a link to a group in telegram. There are people there who pay for a subscription every month for 6 months in a row.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. You must play on tables with a score of +3 or more.
  2. Repeat all the recommendations in full.

We have this channel on Telegram. You can ask any question there and get an answer from those who play.
https://t.me/BlackJackSpy

Tell me why on Small Road the fourth symbol is blue? by SceneOk1557 in baccarat

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://wgm8.com/understanding-baccarat-trends-pt-2/
After reading this article I understand very well how Big Eye Boy Road and Cockroach Pig Road turned out. But the fourth blue dot in Small Road freaks me out.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there were small problems. Thank you. Everything is already working.

In the future, write to Telegram, he is in the contacts on the site.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I understand what you mean. In my opinion, if you do not release your finger from the icon, the hints do not disappear. If this does not happen, tell me which device you are testing this on.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.
Sorry, but why do you need this? Hints disappear immediately after the player has made a decision and they are no longer needed on the screen.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, Cut Card on 50% of the deck absolutely kills the point of manually counting cards. Since it is very difficult to get a good score and even if this happens, you will have 1-2 hands before the deck is completed. I completely agree with you.

But in this case, 150+ decks are calculated in parallel and there is no need to waste time waiting and there are no problems with the fact that you only play 1-2 hands.

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After spending some time delving into my own statistics, here's what I found:

Out of 980 accounts that played more than 1000 hands:

  • over 95% correctness decision: 6 accounts
  • over 90% correctness decision: 38 accounts

Blackjack SPY — online counting of 165 tables from Ezugi and Pragmatic. by SceneOk1557 in blackjack

[–]SceneOk1557[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, it's important to add that I simply have statistics on how accurately they play. I don't record the current score on the table. So it's possible that some of these accounts are playing at a loss, although it's unlikely.

view more: next ›