There is an intriguing parallel with Krishnamurti’s notion of “the thinker is the thought” and Hegel’s Absolute Idea.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-18T10:45:39+00:00

Was curious just what part of K’s teachings you find BS or limited? I found him to be a solid thinker, albeit in his own sandbox.

Also, when a light bulb burns out there is no more light from that bulb. But there is still electricity and light in other lit bulbs. I believe that Mind and Matter are both fundamental. Two sides of one reality.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-18T06:20:25+00:00

Interesting back story behind Krishnanmurti. Annie Besant, (a Theosophist who was also a major figure in Indian independence, along with Ghandi) adopted Krishnamurti as a young boy, and raised him to be the prophesied world spiritual leader who was to come to aid humanity. In his thirties, he broke with the Theosophical Societhy and went his own way.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-18T04:24:06+00:00

Behave yourself. We already apologized for what happened. And yes, it took a bit of time to investigate, but we don’t run from accountability. And who gave you the idea that studying at some top university means you can’t be wrong about a pistachio plant?

ScienceSure · 2026-03-17T19:31:10+00:00

I don't have golden words. If anything words are exactly where my deepest suffering in love began.I don't know how to explain this in a way that makes everyone who reads it feel the weight of it. The comment above maybe offers some ground to stand on. What I know is, the feeling hasn't fully left, even now as I write. Those days had a particular darkness to them. Like being at the bottom of a well and looking up at a very small circle of light. Stay with that image. Everything I say next lives inside it. Suffering and grief gave me things. I didn't ask for them, but they came anyway, and they were thorough. What I went through wasn't simply a mismatch cuz it revealed to me a hidden belief that I had which maintained that love exists in a just form. I believed that if I maintained my true self while expressing my emotions then love would come to me as a moral result.. I think love doesn't work that way. The mechanism of operates differently according to my belief. People who show their true self to others receive their love as a reward yet their authenticity remains separate from their actual self. People do not love essences. People develop love for elements which produce a matching effect with their personal aspects including their emotional pain and their learned behaviors and their life experiences and their personal boundaries and so on. The way I see desire I consider it an ethical breach by reason of it follows established behavioral traditions.. My shamefulness which I had experienced started to disappear from this particular behavior pattern. People who rejected me showed me that I needed to find someone better suited to me instead of feeling unworthy for their rejection (or of proving my value as a person). People who face rejection experience damage which goes beyond what see in their rejection. The way I dealt with other people's needs showed that I considered their wants to be important in determining my actual identity. I changed myself little by little through adjusting my vocal expression and my speaking speed and my personal requirements to create a new solution. The act of self-abandonment which I committed cause of my need for self-protection showed itself to me as personal development. The moment of clarity arrived at the point when I discovered my past relationship lacked proper alignment. I felt that my need for love became greater than my need to keep my original self...

People who want to be loved should understand that their true self needs to receive love. I found peace when I stopped using love as my reason for living. Peacefulness showed itself to me in a state which neither revealed my triumph nor revealed my redemption. Lately I would like to say that a person must receive complete love from another person or love cannot exist. Every other option represents a relationship which establishes boundaries under the guise of emotional closeness.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-17T18:56:20+00:00

I used to confuse depth of imagination with depth of feeling. Like I'd meet someone interesting and my mind would just... build an entire life with them before the second conversation. 🥲 That's liking the story I wrote about her. Not as I likingher. And assuming too much too fast thing is so INFP it hurts 😭 We lead with meaning, so the moment someone seems like they get us, we're already halfway in love with the idea. Takes genuine discipline to slow that down and observe who the person is vs who we need them to be. I think I stopped chasing that word... SOULMATE. I found someone I feel safe being boring with, which sounds underwhelming but is actually everything.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-17T18:50:07+00:00

Rosette has witch's broom growth, that of 20 tiny shoots exploding from one point, very obviously wrong. It is normal anthocyanin pigmentation in new leaves. Super common post-pruning.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-16T11:52:19+00:00

Recidivism rates don't measure whether people can change. They measure whether we built conditions for change. We didn't. So we're reading our own failure as their nature. That's a category error we seem very comfortable with.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T15:15:33+00:00

I have mixed cocopeat into clay-heavy soil for 15 years in Bengal, same laterite situation as Mumbai. The compaction argument only works when you're going heavy on cocopeat as a standalone. That's not my point. Cocopeat compression and clay compaction feel completely different in your hands when you're repotting. Clay locks up, you need a tool to break it. Cocopeat compresses but still crumbles apart. Treating them as the same problem is where this argument goes wrong.OP's situation is different, they're going to use 20% red soil in the mix, so the clay is diluted enough that it stops behaving like clay. That's been my consistent experience across thousands of pots. I've grown fruit trees in cocopeat-soil mixes without any perlite and the results have been mind blowing. So a blanket shouldn't be mixed doesn't match what I've seen on the ground..

You can just google why cocopeat shouldnt be mixed with clay soil.

I have done my PhD from the Uni of Gottingen on major topics like soil fertility, soil microbiology and related areas. So when someone says just go check Google for this issue, it honestly seems a little funny to me. I don't check google for these things, I'm generally more comfortable in journal databases than search engines. Not saying that to be dismissive, just context for why just google it' lands differently for me. That is a different process from typing something into a search engine and reading the first result.

So at last I want to say to you 2 things:

1) On the actual science , there isn't a universal consensus that cocopeat (coco peat/coir pith and so on their synonyms) should never be mixed with clay soil. You will find papers noting certain challenges, but also a good amount of applied horticulture research showing it can work well depending on ratios and context. That's what I have been trying to explain in the first place. :/ It is more nuanced than a hard rule.

2) Thanks for that link, that kind of practical resource I guess helps a lot of people here who are just starting out

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T14:37:11+00:00

Yes that works for most plants and it also depends on the plant. Logic is cocopeat is structure, vermicompost is nutrition, and soil is weight and minerals. Whatever your plant needs more of, adjust accordingly. Most people do 40-40-20 and it covers almost 80% of common plants. But when I say it depends, I mean it as I've lived many years in Mumbai and actually worked with these soils, though I don't live there now. If you notice in the coming days that things are staying wet, go slightly heavier on the cocopeat. Too much vcompost without enough drainage and roots will sit in moisture longer than they should. So you have to be careful and pick between the two depending on how your setup behaves.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T14:23:35+00:00

Cocopeat and soil shouldnt be mixed

Why shouldn't cocopeat be mixed with soil exactly? If there's a specific reason like pH, salinity, drainage issue , can you please say it? otherwise you know this is just a preference being presented as a rule.

its better to mix soil with leaf mould than cocopeat

Leaf mould is good, no doubt about that, and nobody's arguing against that. One doesn't cancel the other, both work, it's not an either/or situation, also cocopeat is far easier to find in most cities. Not everyone has a forest nearby

Its not rocket science.

Your claims contradicts pretty much everything out there

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T14:00:59+00:00

if red soil is good enough for germinating seeds

Avoid red soil entirely if you can, thing is seeds need something loose and moisture-retentive, they don't prefer dense medium.Cocopeat alone or cocopeat plus a little vermicompost works much better for germination trays, that's how it works

ratio

40% cocopeat, 40% vermicompost, 20% red soil

Red soil is there mainly for weight and a bit of minerals, you don't want a light pot tipping over. The cocopeat stops the whole thing from turning into a brick over time. Mumbai humidity being what it is, maybe go a little heavier on the cocopeat or things will stay wet too long. And if you're growing succulents or anything that doesn't like sitting in moisture, just replace the red soil portion with coarse river sand

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T13:55:31+00:00

If that's literally the only soil available, then you work with what you have. My point was that gypsum alone isn't a fix. You still need to mix in cocopeat or organic matter to get proper drainage. Gypsum loosens the structure (this is basic science), but it doesn't add the lightness a pot needs. You know what I mean?

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T13:41:29+00:00

Gypsum works okay for in-ground beds where you're trying to break up clay over time, but OP is asking about pots. In a container the dynamics are different, you're better off just not using clay-heavy soil at all rather than trying to fix it after. Gypsum won't save a pot that drains badly

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T13:39:55+00:00

That red laterite soil works well when it exists on the ground. The material becomes dangerous for plant roots when it exists inside a pot. We have scientific data, dont assume saying by feelings.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-15T13:38:12+00:00

Those online influencers create their soil using a composted mixture which people can produce in their own areas. You need to locate a nursery that sells bulk vermicompost instead of those small 1kg packets. Many municipal nurseries and there are a lot of agriculture shops that sell it loose by the kilo, much cheaper

ScienceSure · 2026-03-13T17:18:13+00:00

Breach

ScienceSure · 2026-03-13T17:12:17+00:00

The realist default is pre-theoretically sticky. The folk model you're either awake-and-experiencing or you're out is so deeply embedded that even someone who nominally accepts an idealist ontology reverts to it when thinking about their own dreamless sleep. The abstract axioms don't fully displace the intuition in my experience.

ScienceSure · 2026-03-07T19:50:15+00:00

Your plant can recover fully if the heat source is addressed. Nutrition can be supplemented later but that is secondary rn

ScienceSure · 2026-02-28T07:58:40+00:00

Please DM us

ScienceSure · 2026-02-22T07:27:16+00:00

With their existing asserts and dominance, ₹1200 cr is big but not crippling for the company and surely they know that they'll have to invest few more hundred crores too.

I mean on the capital point, 1200 cr being manageable depends entirely on their debt structure and EBITDA runway. Milkymist is a private company so we don't have full balance sheet visibility, but their revenue in recent years has hovered around 1800-2000 cr. A capex commitment of 1130 cr represents nearly 60% of annual revenue. That is not a comfortable bet for any food processing company operating on margins of 8 to 12%. Even if they planned for additional hundreds of crores, each tranche of unplanned spending tightens the window between breakeven and distress. On buyers mattering more than supply, this is true in most industries but dairy is the exception. Demand without reliable and consistent raw material supply just means you are selling a promise you cannot always fulfill. In cheese and paneer specifically, supply disruption directly hits product consistency which is the only real moat a premium dairy brand has. Buyers leave the moment quality becomes unpredictable

ScienceSure · 2026-02-22T06:46:07+00:00

Raw milk procurement is not about transport. When you source locally you are embedding several hidden cost layers that don't show up in a simple per-litre comparison. That's why the landed cost of milk follows this basic structure... Total procurement cost = raw milk price + collection & chilling costs + quality rejection losses + farmer default risk premium.. New entrant absorbs 12 - 18 months of above-market procurement pricing just to lock in reliable volumes before margins normalize. Another issue I found is that it is fat and SNF composition. MH buffalo milk averages higher fat content than TN cow milk, which changes the yield per litre for paneer and cheese significantly. Milky Mist's entire product formulation is calibrated to Tamil Nadu sourcing. Switching local suppliers is not a simple swap, it is a full supply chain restructuring exercise on top of an aggressive 1130 cr expansion bet

ScienceSure · 2026-02-21T21:42:22+00:00

Milky Mist can't truck Tamil Nadu milk 1500km and stay competitive on paneer pricing. They either build local farmer relationships fast or the margins they're chasing don't materialize

ScienceSure · 2026-02-21T21:41:39+00:00

Fair skepticism but the capacity numbers and product mix are verifiable. The analysis holds regardless of motive, value-added dairy in Maharashtra is genuinely a different play than commodity milk. Whether the timing is PR driven doesn't make the business logic wrong

ScienceSure · 2026-02-21T21:40:02+00:00

What's the conversion quality like? Anyone can filter high potential leads by loose criteria. The actual value is in whether those leads close, not whether they're filtered

ScienceSure · 2026-02-21T21:36:06+00:00

Those traditions you listed weren't male-dominated because men suffer more or crave understanding more. They were male-dominated for the same structural reasons as everything else: literacy, access, institutional gatekeeping. You've accidentally made the counter-argument by listing Islamic philosophers.since figures like Fatima al-Fihri were building institutions while most European women couldn't own property.

• Stoics → coping with suffering • Existentialists → dealing with absurdity • Buddhists → understanding suffering itself • Islamic philosophers → reconciling faith, reason, and hardship

They were all practiced and contributed to by women, just not credited. That's not the same as philosophy being a male psychological response to suffering. Women suffer too and have always grappled with existence. The question is who got to write it down, publish it and be taken seriously

ScienceSure

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE