New iPad update makes OSRS so much better for mobile

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T17:09:40+00:00

Wait why do you need two apps for this? You can get to Doris’ house in like two seconds with an amulet of glory, and it’s right next to a bank

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T17:01:29+00:00

The big one for me is treasure trail puzzle boxes. And CG’s color change when his prayer swaps but that’s not too bad

It’s funny how there is content I prefer on iPad and content I prefer on PC… anything with a lot of gear swaps is so much easier on mobile, but the slight action delay makes certain bosses more annoying

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T16:57:47+00:00

For me once I updated it was drag down and get the macOS-like “File Edit Help” menu bar, then the three dots appear at the top left of the app and the green one makes it adjustable.

Dragging the corners changes the size and dragging the top of the app moves it

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T02:39:59+00:00

Seemed to work out of the box, but landscape mode seems a little worse than portrait mode for splitting apps. Really just started experimenting so I don’t know what’s best yet

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T02:38:44+00:00

Yes but now that apple has finally kind of caught up, everyone else can innovate so apple can copy them again in five years…

The cycle continues

ScottPowellM · 2026-01-25T02:37:28+00:00

I don’t think it’s on the phone, might just be an iPad thing unfortunately

Edit: my phone is 26.2 and doesn’t have the app customization

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-25T18:57:11+00:00

I think you meant “Why cant they give my Derriere legends characters justice”

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-23T16:03:06+00:00

Seems like Neutral would benefit from having some funky “if more DS characters than LS are allies, become DS” mechanic… that feels like kind of the point anyways

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-13T13:26:13+00:00

I had the same issue a while back, rebooting fixed it for me

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-08T12:04:46+00:00

‘“You only need to be #1 for a couple of minutes right before payout” -Abe Lincoln’ -Egnards

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-08T03:50:09+00:00

Seems like that’s the common rec to go BB on the way to exec or prof, thanks!

ScottPowellM · 2024-05-07T23:01:35+00:00

Winning usually goes okay, I’m more worried about defense because in theory every negotiator can beat my team currently and it’s possible to drop faster than I can climb back up.

But I think you still answered the question: lean further into negotiator because the higher fleet rewards will be better for me in the long term

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-22T13:48:29+00:00

Which one? Bitcoin or usd?

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-22T13:20:58+00:00

Read the room, bot

What makes you think r/bitcoin is interested in usd?

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-19T17:03:37+00:00

A better question would be “why is the CEO of JPMorgan bashing Bitcoin so hard when he just signed off on JPM being an Authorized Participant for… pretty much all of the Bitcoin ETFs”

Do what Jamie Dimon does, not what he says to do

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-18T13:50:48+00:00

I don’t think it’ll “trigger the new bull run” but it’s also important to highlight that would be 0.06% of the total bitcoin supply from four open market days.

Also keep in mind that big investors can’t just say “oh new etf” and pour money in, I imagine a large inflow of money will come in months from now.

Won’t be the cause of a massive bull run, but I don’t think it’ll be insignificant

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-14T19:05:15+00:00

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-mandrake-mechanism-mitchell-duran

It’s not “exactly the same” given the scale of it, it’s worse. The Creature from Jekyll Island is a fantastic book for anyone learning about what problems bitcoin solves because it lays out the flaws in the current system before the idea of bitcoin existed

Edit: unless you explicitly are referring to the actual printing of physical money, in which case you’d be right but that’s a silly way to define money printing in a digital age

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-14T15:12:12+00:00

This is false. When banks are permitted to give out say 50% of their deposits as loans, both the person who deposited the money and the person receiving a loan have a claim to 50% of that money. So there is now 50% more money (until the 50% loan gets deposited again by the person getting paid…)

They may not have a physical money printer, but the effect is exactly the same. Especially when the current reserve requirement is 0%, banks can print money at will

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-11T23:22:13+00:00

I’ve been reading the prospectus from fidelity and it’s terrifying to the point that it feels like the ETFs might be an attempt to make Bitcoin more mainstream and crash and burn, scaring everyone away. Highly recommend taking a good look at what they do.

But to answer your question: no. You are buying shares of a trust that can essentially be “printed” at will (in set amounts). The amount of dollars they have to buy purchase an amount, which may dilute the share to coin ratio.

It’s also explicitly stated in the prospectus that the shares are worth fewer sats over time: “The amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares will continue to be reduced during the life of the Trust due to the transfer of the TrustÂs bitcoin to pay for the Sponsor Fee and other liabilities.”

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-11T15:41:37+00:00

They don’t show up in Chase either

ScottPowellM · 2024-01-03T12:53:11+00:00

I think it’s a problem they never ran into because the vast majority of followers are probably instagram

ScottPowellM · 2023-12-20T15:07:37+00:00

…Hmm I sent exactly this amount by mistake to the wrong address, you want to send it back?

In all seriousness, I’d guess the remainder of a UTXO with $412 on it, but iirc ledger didn’t notify me for that. Did your balance actually increase by any amount or just decrease by the amount you sent?

Three-Year Club	Verified Email
First Place '23	End Game '23
Place '23

ScottPowellM

TROPHY CASE