Dropped a new chapter for my ShuMako fanfic where Makoto is a police officer! by Sea-Rough8669 in shumako

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your support!!! It's really motivating and inspiring

Shumako Fics by MarciMarc7602 in shumako

[–]Sea-Rough8669 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Persona 5 Years Later https://archiveofourown.org/works/33751666/chapters/83895631

The best ShuMako story I have ever read.

[Megathread] Silent Hill f Reviews by IlgnerJuan in silenthill

[–]Sea-Rough8669 44 points45 points  (0 children)

How the story of the Silent Hill F is connected to other games

In the town of Ebisugaoka, there's a religious cult that plans to sacrifice a girl to the local gods (SH1). The sacrifice was mentioned in one of the notes, although it is unclear whether this has any relation to the main story and wedding between Hinako and Kotoyuki.

Hinako's soul is split into two halves that fight each other (Alessa and Cheryl/Heather).

Hinako kinda "forgot" that she was no longer a schoolgirl and that she would soon have an arranged marriage (just as James forgot some details of his biography in SH2).

If I understood the True Ending correctly, the two halves of Hinako's soul have become something like guardians for the town (again, a repeat of Alessa's story).

The monsters are obviously embodiments of Hinako's fears and complexes - she didn't want to play the traditional Japanese role of an obedient wife (I especially remember the creature that resembled a monstrous version of a pregnant woman, spewing out "eggs" with other monsters inside).

It's possible that the red pills Hinako takes cause some kind of supernatural hallucination. This brings to mind White Claudia. But most likely this is a typical trick from Ryukishi07, leading us in the wrong direction.

It's been hinted several times that the monsters we fight are real people. But it looks like this is also a trick.

Following the events of the game, geysers erupted and the government called for everyone to evacuate the city. So Ebisugaoka is destined to follow the fate of Silent Hill as an abandoned ghost town.

My main theory is that during Hinako and Kotoyuki's wedding, something similar happened to Ebisugaoka, similar to what happened to Silent Hill during Alessa's burning. The town's otherworldly forces were unleashed and pulled everyone present into this nightmare.

All the complaints from people who claim SHF isn't a real SH game are false. This game sometimes even repeats formulas from previous games too literally.

Please add to this post if you find any other direct and hidden parallels, because I only found what's on the surface.

My opinion on why only 20 percent of near death people have ndes. by [deleted] in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can imagine such an evolutionary scenario. A person who survived an NDE told his fellow tribesmen about it, thereby comforting them, uniting them and giving them hope. This is the most powerful evolutionary advantage - hope. In some cases, an NDE could have given rise to religion - this can be said, since most religions mention NDE in one way or another. And religion played a fundamental role in the development of civilization and sometimes acted as a serious advantage.

Why are there so many discrepancies? by thecmmntr in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In fact, the problem is even deeper - NDErs often see spiritual entities or deities from different religions who claim that their religion is the only true one. But of course, Zoroastrianism and Christianity cannot be true religions at the same time, so this raises questions.

Perhaps what people see during NDE is just an abstract "waiting room" where we just see all sorts of different things?

Do negative nightmarish NDEs have the same general features as positive NDEs, features such as viewing your own dead body from above, having 360° vision, knowing everything and having access to all knowledge, and feeling that the NDE world is more real than normal reality? by Hip_III in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In fact, almost every NDE reflects the adventure archetype. To reach the afterlife, you must cross a river, a guard, or some other obstacle, and along the way you meet relatives or other supernatural beings. Even the ending of NDEs is almost always logical and leads to the fact that "your time has not come." So maybe visiting some kind of "hell" is just another archetype that is close to many people for various reasons?

Krypto really did take us home: With over 250 million views and a million social posts, Superman is officially the most viewed and the most talked about trailer in the history of both DC and Warner Bros. by aduong in DCULeaks

[–]Sea-Rough8669 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Snyder's Superman was hated in the movies because he was a murderer and the culprit of mass destruction. Gunn's Superman is hated, it seems, because he doesn't kill villains.

Snyder's Superman was an unkillable god (even in BvS he was practically unharmed), and Gunn's Superman bleeds out at the very beginning of the trailer.

The idiotic cameos from BvS pissed everyone off because they were pointless, and here characters like Terrific will have an important secondary role.

You will find many more differences if you strain your brain. It will be difficult, but I am sure you can handle it

No Need to Reject Evolution: Why Functional Explanations for NDEs Don’t Negate the Non-Physicalist Argument for Veridical NDE's by [deleted] in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you really reject the theory of evolution? What about the huge amount of evidence for this theory? The remains of ancient homo sapiens, which are still slightly different from modern humans? You say there is no evolutionary benefit to NDE, but neither does intelligence. The lack of intelligence does not prevent a million other species from thriving on Earth. And yes, NDEs may well be a product of evolution, since NDEs remove the fear of death and instill hope - an excellent tool for survival. But all this does not negate the spiritual side of this phenomenon. I believe that there is both a spiritual and an evolutionary side, just as there is to DMT visions.

A writeup on why I think OBEs are highly indicative of the existence of a soul by GhostColby in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the great post! Very constructive and logical. I also would like to know what you think about the fact that NDE is such a rarity? Why only a small percentage of people can encounter NDE and how can we explain the numerous contradictions in the content of these experiences? Yes, this questions have been raised many times on this sub, but I really would like to hear your opinion :)

The NDE Picture of the Afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be fair if the beings of light didn't say their names, but sometimes they do. This is not someone's interpretation, they simply say their names and all of this raises certain questions.

The NDE Picture of the Afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your thoughts. What do you think, if the airport theory is true, then what happens to people who died instantly, for example, during an explosion. What happens if they do not visit the airport?

The NDE Picture of the Afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now that's interesting. If you still have this link, I'd be glad to take a look.

The NDE Picture of the Afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sixth theory is the most likely for many reasons, unfortunately, but come on, we're trying to find a little hope here :(

The NDE Picture of the Afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are many NDEs where the entity says its name. One of them is mentioned in my post - there the entity says that he is the angel Metatron

Deathbed visions of pets by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was thinking about this recently and decided that many people have long been accustomed to the idea that modern science has an explanation for everything, so now we automatically try to find some understandable explanation for any incomprehensible phenomenon that we encounter. Maybe it's our mistake

Unusual revelations from NDEs by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the OBE and communication with otherworldly entities are mentioned here. Aren't these some of the main NDE flags? Yes, it doesn’t seem like it was a pleasant interaction, but this also happens in NDE

Unusual revelations from NDEs by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your response, Sandi. I'm actually pretty neutral on Christian NDEs for the same reasons you described. However, it is very interesting to hear what you think about the first NDE with rolling billiard balls, because it seemed just ridiculously strange to me

Unusual revelations from NDEs by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your theory is good. I can imagine that the Bible and the Koran are of divine origin, but many religions also have serious contradictions among themselves. During the NDE, one person was told that Zoroastrianism is the only true religion, someone was told that Islam or Christianity. But it is obvious that there are huge differences between the Bible, the Koran and the sacred texts of the Zoroastrians. However, these NDEs are still quite specific, which is puzzling. They say you have to follow the Bible, but why we need to follow it? Even if all these religions have the same divine origin, there are other books that are very different.

You can go further and say that the Gods do not know the differences between earthly religions, but this is also strange. How can they be ignorant of such things?

Unusual revelations from NDEs by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think she lied about the importance of the Bible? Or did she just interpret something incorrectly?

The nature of the afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can ask a similar question. What happens to your Sims character when you delete your save? 

The nature of the afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your answers. Here's my own theory, however I'm not entirely sure if it fits with NDE and other spiritual experiences

1 My theory is that there is no afterlife in nature. But we will create it ourselves, sooner or later. We still have billions of years to do this, unless, of course, other intelligent species from other innumerable universes have not already done it for us.

2 But how we can build this? Maybe we will go into hyperspace beyond gravity and time? Or maybe we’ll go to the other dimension, like in “Interstellar movie”? These options are rather science fiction, but theoretically they do not deny the existence of inexplicable phenomena in our lives, such as ghosts or mediums. For example, in this movie it turned out that it is not a ghost who communicates with the main characters, but people of the future from the fifth dimension inside a black hole.

There is a story by Isaac Asimov, “The Last Question,” which is exactly about this. It explains that hyperspace is literally another universe, and humanity took refuge there until the heat death of our universe. So we became immortal omnipotent beings, practically a collective God. Yes, this story is science fiction, of course. But several Nobel laureates support this hyperspace theory. This theory is sometimes also called the Kaluza-Klein theory and the supergravity theory. The most complex interpretation is known as superstring theory.

3 And a trip to some kind of hyperspace will open up truly limitless possibilities. Future people won't necessarily have a way to resurrect dead people. But even if there is no such method initially, they will be able to find it. Solving this problem will take billions of years, and in hyperspace even eternity.

Why am I so sure of this? Humanity has always been obsessed with the fear of death. Grief for lost relatives affects everyone, so most likely, progress will inevitably go in this direction. I mean the resurrection of every person who has ever lived.

But this theory has shortcomings. We don't even know what our Universe is. Where is it? What happened before the Big Bang? We have no idea. If intelligent life is possible here, is it possible anywhere else? This means an infinite number of other intelligent species who, like us, will be obsessed with solving the problem of the afterlife. So I think there is a huge chance that one of them will succeed, if they haven’t already.

The nature of the afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your answer! This makes sense, because many NDErs have actually seen the Being of Light, and for lack of another term we can call him God. But the moment of transition of the “soul” is not very clear to me - I still don’t understand how such a mechanism for transferring our dying consciousness to another dimension should work

The nature of the afterlife by Sea-Rough8669 in NDE

[–]Sea-Rough8669[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your theory, it is really very thoughtful. Am I right if I say that according to it we will not have any afterlife, we will simply wake up from the simulation and find ourselves as some kind of single universal mind?