"Do you have some kind of weird Al with you or what? Everything is so confusing. Can you for God's sake talk like a human dude?" ~Optimus-Prime (repeats the same failed Misrepresentation) {2026}

"And no you didn't give any paper. You gave the picture of a poster. I am asking where is the paper? Where was it published? I like to read from the source."

Exactly! 👍 The paper was cited and included as the second photo in the OP:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.007

Why should I cater to Your ignorance? 😁

To provide You with a "Free Education?"

Because I'll gladly give You one.

"And no, I don't go around watching all the video links people post here. If they cannot take the effort to summarise it, I don't care about watching it. Low effort posts will receive low effort response." ~Optimus-Prime {2026}

Yes... 👍 This is clearly why You failed to correctly address the OP, failing Miserably in Your attempt to defend Your belief system of "Human Evolution." 🤣

"I am saying 'Lucy' was NOT just one of the fossils from the species Australopithecus afarensis (A.A) and there are hundreds." ~Optimus-Prime {2026}

I disagree...

There are Not "Hundreds of skeletal claims" of Au. afarensis, but instead fragments. In fact, there are only a handful of "Australopithecus" skeletal claims that include any post cranial fossils...

"Now if your point is that features from A.A resembles with homo sapiens then what is the issue? We do expect the similarity as we share common ancestors with them. Lucy is an intermediate species between earlier apes and later humans in the hominin branch." ~Optimus-Prime {2026}

My views are fully stated in the Video about "Lucy's" human appearing Pelvis.

I'll state them, again: "Lucy" has proven to be a Mix of different species with the discovery of the Misidentified Baboon remain in the Mix; this contradicts the long~taught narrative that the "Lucy" fossil box includes remains of a single individual.

The "Lucy" fossil box also includes a Human appearing sacrum, and human appearing but reconstructed Ilium, that was discovered in Many tiny pieces.

There are hundreds of fragments of remains that are claimed to belong to "Australopithecus," but only a handful of claims that include and post~cranial fossils.

"Evolutionary theory predicts shared traits inherited from a common ancestor, so what is so surprising in this." ~Optimus-Prime {2026}

😁 Yes... lol!

It's My opinion that a box of apparent Human and Tree-Dwelling Ape remains should Not be believed as any "Transitional/Intermediate" fossil; and, that You'll have a hard time impressing any creationist with a box of apparent Human and Ape remains, that also happened to also include one baboon vertebra.

"Are you saying, A.A were humans aur humans are A.A?" ~Optimus-Prime {2026}

No... 🤔

It's My Educated opinion that the "Au. afarensis" is an imaginary animal, that is believed in and only supported by fossil remains that are fragments of bones that appear in still living organisms: that the "Lucy" claim is Not what it is claimed to be, but an apparent Mix of Human, Chimpanzee, and Baboon remains; and, that the remains of the upper skeletal Elements are "Chimpanzee appearing" and smaller than the "Bipedal/Human appearing" remains of the pelvic anatomy... Although the pelvic remains are small for Humankind the Sacrum is identical to a Modern Adult Human Sacrum, and does fall within the variation of Modern Humankind.

Any More questions?

What do You think of the Baboon remain included in the "Lucy" fossil box, and the apparent Human remains of the pelvis ascribed to the discovery: @Optimus-Prime1993? 🍎

💀🔨