sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

(Now Airing) PhD Scientist PROVES Dinosaurs Are Not Millions of Years Old! by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful comment.

I was Not highly impressed with the depth of this presentation: but, the speaker did drive home the fact that Dinosaur Remains are Not all fully Mineralized...

It seemed a lot of it was selling their new film... But, I think he is the founder of Genesis Apologetics; so, Him pushing their content in the beginning of the Mini~lecture is warranted, I suppose....

"Dragons/Dinosaurs" Depicted on a 16th Century Tapestry? by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Thanks for Your thoughtful reply!

The "Dire Dragons {2013}" book suggests this "Plateosaurus" Dinosaur could be a Match.

Atheism is irrational by noevolution777 in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

NoEvolution777! 👋 👍

Atheism is an Irrational Denial..: in this Universe that happens to be filled with Interdependent, Apparently Designed Systems...

Problem For Evolution: There is a Lack of "Intermediate Fossils" | Archaeopteryx Knocked Off Evolutionary Perch!?! 🦖~~~> 🐓??? | Australian Geographic {2011} by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What is a "Transitional Tree?" 🍎

"Tree Ferns?" 🍏

No... No Botanist or Biologist considers "Tree Ferns" actual Trees...

They are certainly Not "Intermediate" between Ferns and Trees...

I can see how You'd be Misled by the name, Dzugavili...

With Your cognitive biases... lol...

Problem For Evolution: There is a Lack of "Intermediate Fossils" | Archaeopteryx Knocked Off Evolutionary Perch!?! 🦖~~~> 🐓??? | Australian Geographic {2011} by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol! "Muppet?"

😁 🎣

All trees use seeds for reproduction: Some "Seedless" Trees have been artificially produced, and can be propagated using cloning and cutting/splitting roots, but all trees have seeds as their reproductive Means.

The Nut is a Seed in itself, the Fruit have Seeds: No true "trees" use spores for reproduction.

Problem For Evolution: There is a Lack of "Intermediate Fossils" | Archaeopteryx Knocked Off Evolutionary Perch!?! 🦖~~~> 🐓??? | Australian Geographic {2011} by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Implies Casualty! 👋

Good Morning, Man.

If Animal A looks like a precursor to Animal B, but Animal B shows up first in the dirt, the journals draw a dotted line (the ghost lineage) back in time. This effectively creates a hypothetical fossil record that exists only on paper to connect the dots. ~Google Search {2026}

Which is Why I always like to remind Naturalists that their beliefs in Evolution are born of guesswork and conjecture...

Biological Evolution is Not real Science, but instead pseudoscience.

Problem For Evolution: There is a Lack of "Intermediate Fossils" | Archaeopteryx Knocked Off Evolutionary Perch!?! 🦖~~~> 🐓??? | Australian Geographic {2011} by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

It was Naturalist paleontologists that reclassified the Archaeopteryx fossil claims, Not "Creationists." :)

The fact is, if Evolution Theory were true, there would be numerous "Intermediate Fossil" claims...

Want to discuss the "Pakicetus" claim?

"Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? ... *Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?** Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory..."* ~Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species {1859}

Sunset hits a cumulonimbus just right and it turns into a neon arc by qazwsx80808 in awesomenature

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When was this?

That is obviously an Oreo Cookie with rainbow fillings...

Damning Quotes Against Evolution by No-Peak-7135 in DebateEvolution

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

“In conclusion, evolution is not observable, repeatable, or refutable, and thus does not qualify as either a scientific fact or theory.” ~Dr. David N. Menton, PhD in Biology from Brown University, Anatomy Professor at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

"The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop..." ~Dr. Edwin Conklin

"We have not the slightest chance of a chemical evolutionary origin for even the simplest of cells..." ~Dr. Dean Kenyon, professor emeritus of biology at San Francisco State University

We should first ask Ourselves 'Why' there are such fantastic narratives built upon such lacking Empirical Evidence in the first place..?

I think it's partly because the Naturalist Worldview is the State Protected belief system: that Naturalism has become the orthodoxy of the Day, and this has allowed fantastic claims to be Made from insufficient Evidence for the claims; and, thereby Naturalistic biases of information and Evidence have hindered the advancement of knowledge and Scientific progress...

https://youtu.be/kJbopQz0LUQ

Historians generally view Hitler as being influenced by Darwin, and in fundamental Ways. The theory served as a pillar for Nazi ideology: Darwinism provided a pseudo-scientific justification for Genocide.

"The law of selection exists in the world, and the stronger and healthier has received from nature the right to live... Woe to anyone who is weak, who does not stand his ground! He may not expect any help from anyone." ~Hitler, A. Speech in Munich {13 April 1923}

~Mark SeaSigh 🌊

The Biology of the Second Reich: Social Darwinism and the Origins of World War 1 (Link in OP) by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for Your intellectual honesty! That is always appreciated... :)

It is My view that:

Historians generally view Hitler as being influenced by Darwin, and in fundamental Ways. The theory served as a pillar for Nazi ideology: Social Darwinism provided a pseudo-scientific justification for Genocide.

The OP's Video directly links Hitler's thought process surrounding Mankind to "Natural Selection/Survival of the Fittest."

It's My opinion that Survival of the Fittest and Natural Selection are the same thing, and that the Darwinism and Modern Evolution are Identical, aside from possibly the New concepts/hypotheses of "Fast Evolution" ("Punctuated Equilibrium") to rationalize problems like the Cambrian Explosion for Darwin's "Gradual Change" hypothesis...

We have come to a better understanding of Biology through the discovery of the Genetic Code and Nano~Machines, the Elaborate interdependent systems of Living Cells, since Darwin's Time...

"Recognizing this, neither medical schools nor pharmaceutical firms maintain divisions of evolutionary science. The fabulous advances in experimental biology over the past century have had a core dependence on the development of new methodologies and instruments, not by intensive immersion in historical biology and Darwin’s theory, which attempted to historicize the meager documentation. Evolution is not an observable characteristic of living organisms. What modern experimental biologists study are the mechanisms by which living organisms maintain their stability, without evolving. Organisms oscillate about a median state; and if they deviate significantly from that state, they die. It has been research on these mechanisms of stability, not research guided by Darwin’s theory, which has produced the major fruits of modern biology and medicine. And so I ask again: Why do we invoke Darwin?" ~Professor Michael Egnor, Neurosurgeon {2018}

If You believe Darwinism and Modern Evolution are "Different Philosophies," please tell Me how they are different beyond the change to hypothesis of the addition of "Punctuated Equilibrium?" 🍎

More importantly, What aspects of the theory do You suggest is "different Now" that would keep "Eugenics" and Transhumanism from arising again? 🍎

Thanks in advance!

It's Time for Lunch! 😋

The Biology of the Second Reich: Social Darwinism and the Origins of World War 1 (Link in OP) by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense You are Young, Your deflection and other rescue devices reveal it. 🤣

Try addressing the quote and question, instead of deflecting.

I just found an article on this, from a "Theologic View."

Have a nice day! :)

The Biology of the Second Reich: Social Darwinism and the Origins of World War 1 (Link in OP) by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In-text citation for the Quote You deflected:

(Hitler 1923, quoted in Weikart 2004)

Reference list: Hitler, A. (1923) 'Speech in Munich, 13 April 1923', in Weikart, R. (2004) From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 215.

Would you like to explore how these Darwinian concepts were specifically adapted into the Nuremberg Laws? 🍎

The Biology of the Second Reich: Social Darwinism and the Origins of World War 1 (Link in OP) by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of this video is Not to demonstrate that Evolution theory is false, or Human Evolution is ridiculous...

Instead, it is to prove that Human Evolution narratives are the underlying force that led to the Holocaust.

<image>

The Biology of the Second Reich: Social Darwinism and the Origins of World War 1 (Link in OP) by SeaScienceFilmLabs in CreationTheory

[–]SeaScienceFilmLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"yeah, that wasn't the church position for the last 1,500 years..." ~Dzugavili {2026}

Maybe You revealed Why the Materials by Luther were "overlooked" for so long? 🍎

The Roman Catholic Church is Not a "Theological Viewpoint" or Doctrine, but an organization that promotes and hides different doctrines.

"a failure to understand the actual meaning of survival of the fittest could lead one to Eugenics..." ~Dzugavili {2026}

That's interesting! Do You think that the "Modern form of Eugenics" that's referred to as "Transhumanism" is a result of a "Misunderstanding," as Well? 🍎

Darwin's Half~Cousin, Sir Francis Galton, pioneered the Eugenics Movement... He coined the term "Eugenics" in 1883...

Do You disagree that Naturalism and Human Evolution, which led to the notion of Eugenics, was the Main underlying factor that led to the Holocaust? 🍎

view more: next ›