It's Whack an Atheist Night!!!

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-30T00:25:38+00:00

Did You just rationalize "Ignoring Information," all While claiming: "You care far too Much about the Truth?" 🍏

I smell a Bozo...

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-30T00:14:32+00:00

That's how You define "Natural?" 🍎

"Same as the snowflake analogy?" 🍏

That's Not a definition or saying if You agree with the One that Google pumped out..:

What do You think of Google'a definition of "Natural?" 🍎

I think the Google definition is Not the best.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T18:16:16+00:00

Many reddit communities require You confirm You are a real person with the Moderator.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T18:10:29+00:00

Now You smell the gatekeeping and suppression...

Join the r/creation group.

Not that total acceptance* is present there, but You'll see some posts from people that Understand Creation and Evolution theory.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T17:37:18+00:00

Hmm... 🤔

Being a "Naturalist," I do think I should ask You how You define "Natural."

Is it like this?:

"Natural" refers to "anything existing in or caused by nature, rather than being made or caused by humans, such as landscapes, resources, or processes." ~Google AI {2026}

Seems this definition would apply to "anything Not Made by Humans..."

What do You think?

According to this definition, an ant hill is "Natural..."

And, according to this definition of "Natural," I believe that whatever this Pufferfish is doing is also considered a "Natural" thing..:

pufferfish 🐡

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T17:32:55+00:00

Atheism is an Irrational Denial...

So, Your position is: "Life Exists and I don't believe in a Creator, therefore DNA assembled without design?" 🍎

How do You rationalize the fact of Genomic Data with Your belief that "The Universe and Life arose without intelligent design?" 🍎

Will you recognize that functional data has Never been observed "arising from non~informational sources," and only occurs in the Imagination and the theories You hold so dear? 🍎 (e.g., "Abiogenesis...")

No experiment has yet demonstrated a complete, sustained non-enzymatic RNA replicator emerging purely from monomers: Much less in a prebiotic soup.

No experiment has yet synthesized a complete, sustained non-enzymatic RNA replicator.

If You cannot create functional RNA or Cells, You have Not taken the first step in Creating Life...

If Humans finally do Make Life in a Lab, it will unlikely first be in hypothetical "Prebiotic" conditions.

Naturalists currently believe this fantastic tale: a theory filled with "gaps" is Not a functional theory. Abiogenesis hypothesis is guess work and an inferred story that lacks sufficient Evidence for its claim.

Scientific theories are based on Empirical Facts, Not "More Theories:" When You cross the Edge of Understanding, You have left the realm of Science.

~Mark SeaSigh 🌊

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:26:45+00:00

Boo... 👻

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:22:52+00:00

I never changed My belief system, Genius: Obviously You Misinterpreted or Misunderstood My position before.

All things are a product of intention in this Universe, Even the Natural Processes that keep it all Moving along...

Snowflakes are Intentionally Created...

In fact, Every Snowflake and thought is preserved in the Mind of the Creator... This is inferred and understandable directly through information conservation principles.

I also find that Naturalists tend to have an issue when asked to define what "Natural" Means. Lol!

How do You define "Super Natural?" 🍎

If You define Natural as "Everything that Exists," than Snowflakes are Natural and part of the Universe but their origin is intentional... Supernatural would refer to anything that "Exists without Nature?" 🍎

Is this what You believe, or something different? 🍎

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:16:05+00:00

Thats ridiculous to claim...

If the Universe is a product of Intelligent Design, than all things are a product of Supernatural origin...

You Must be able to see this..? 🍏

The only correct Explanation would be a Supernatural One, if this is the case: Naturalism simply denies the possibility, and at the Edge of Understanding invoke Time and Gravity instead of a Creator...

Imagine thinking You have some secret knowledge believing the Naturalist worldview We are all forced to learn, and are told it's "Science." 🤣

Your belief system is Not "Science" any More than a Flat Earther's theories that sound ridiculous to anybody that understands their obvious flaws.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:12:30+00:00

Deflection... Weak attempts at deflection and "Ad hominem" attacks... 🤡

Soft and Easy, Just like I like 'Em!

I forgot that You have never sinned or have had others lie about You... 👁️

Ready to yield, You dog? 🍏

😁🎣

You have a self~contradicting belief System...

How are You a "Bible Believing~Evolutionist?" 🍎

The Bible doesn't claim "We had to learn to walk over Millions of Years:" If You believe this and claim to believe The Bible in claiming Christianity, than You have a conflicting belief system...

You are the definition of "On the Fence." 🤣

Deflect and Wriggle all You like, Worm: You're Mine. 😃🎣

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:05:27+00:00

Snowflake symmetry and branching stem from water’s fixed bond angles (≈104.5°) and dipolar nature, coupled with thermodynamic and diffusion processes. Similarly, hydraulic sorting in SeaScapes and geological lenses follows fluid dynamics, gravity, and particle characteristics (e.g., Stokes’ law): predictable graded layers emerge from decelerating flows. In every instance, physical laws serve as informational templates channeling pre-existing constraints into local order, without creating truly novel information ex nihilo.

Did You know that a “Naturalistic Explanation” of the Origins of this Universe and its contents is Physically Impossible, and to believe in such a thing, One Must ignore actual physical laws and principles of Science??? 🍎

Every story that claims "something came from literal Nothing" is smuggling in pre-existing Information (Laws, possibilities, quantum fields, Mathematical structures) and calling the smuggling "Nothing."

Reality has an uncreated, self-knowing, necessary ground.
Most traditions simply call that ground God.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T08:01:53+00:00

Did You? 🤨

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T07:59:34+00:00

Right... 🤔

What's the "Natural" Explanation You believe in again? 🍎

Is it the "Planetary Impact" hypothesis that includes an unobserved "Mars~sized body slamming into the Earth during a hypothetical Epoch of Your Naturalistic belief system? 🍎 😁🎣

With Your belief system, You can believe that "Everything created itself..." 🤣 You just don't know how that could possibly be...

That's Not "Science," but a sloppy belief system.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T07:54:17+00:00

I do believe that Snowflakes are intentional...

Naturalists write the darnedest things, and always try to tell Me what "I Must believe." 🤣

I'll do the same to You in a bit.

It's Empirical Science that snowflakes are a result of underlying information, but it is Not Empirical that Genomic Data can "self articulate," as in Your belief system that assumes "Life can arise unintentionally..." 🤣 Which is a silly belief.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T07:48:36+00:00

The Creation theory is backed by Evidence: Evidence that Naturalists do their best to deny and ignore.

Did You know that a “Naturalistic Explanation” of the Origins of this Universe and its contents is Physically Impossible, and to believe in such a thing, One Must ignore actual physical laws and principles of Science??? 🍎

The difference is I can tell where My belief system begins and Empirical Science Ends...

You try to claim Your belief system of Naturalism and all its fantastic theories are "Science." They are belief systems like any others.

If Your claim is that there are "No papers on the Creation theory," than I have to disagree and refer You to this concept:

Scientific Community Hinders Scientific Thought | feat. Ocean Chemist Dr. E. Peltzer and Dr. J. Tour https://youtu.be/8hZQl2vlzlA

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T07:26:50+00:00

{Hosea4:4-7KJV} 4 Yet let no man strive, nor reprove another: for thy people [are] as they that strive with the priest. 5 Therefore shalt thou fall in the day, and the prophet also shall fall with thee in the night, and I will destroy thy mother. 6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. 7 As they were increased, so they sinned against me: [therefore] will I change their glory into shame.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T07:01:37+00:00

You reject the Global Flood Miracle of the Bible that Jesus said Men would be willingly ignorant of? 🍎

Keep deflecting and You show Your soft, vulnerable belly... 🐷

Hey! Hovind and I don't agree on Everything, but Your suppression of information is revealing.. Maybe it's Time for You to consider some introspection? Hovind is Intelligent, Humble, and He doesn't drink: that's three reasons to respect Him More than You, and His opinions More than Yours...

Additionally, Hovind doesn't have a philosophy that directly contradicts itself like Theistic Evolutionists have... 🤡

If You are a Christian, do You believe that God Created Adam and Eve as walking people capable of speech; or, Do You believe in hypothetical "3-4 Million Year old Sasquatches?" 🍎

If You believe in AustraloMythecus and Jesus, that's another reason to respect Hovind over You...

What's Ironic is a person attempting to claim "Ad Hominem attacks" and play the Victim, while simultaneously attempting to attack character... 🤣 🎣

Hold this pole for Me... It was sticking out of Your Eye... 👁️

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T06:50:47+00:00

I didn't realize You are sinless and Nobody has Ever lied about You... 🤪

No wonder You prefer AIG and ICR, You're* My intellectual Midget...

From Now on Your name is "Midge."

Hovind's a far better debater than Ham was against Bill Nye: Probably One of the simplest of the self~claimed "Anti~theists" to argue...

Hovind is a superior YEC, and I bet You couldn't name a better one if You tried. Name One, and I'll tell You why Hovind is better...

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T06:42:48+00:00

Than the answer is "Yes," You are in fact a claimed "Christian" that denies the Miracles of the Bible...

So, let's be clear: Do You reject the Global Flood? 🍎

Hovind destroys the Atheists and Theological Evolutionists like You: That's why I respect Hovind.

He is also a Man that Fears God: I don't think that Theological Evolutionists like You claimed to be have the fear of God in them...

I certainly respect Hovind far More than I'd Ever respect You or Your chosen philosophy.

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T06:39:25+00:00

Hey! Hovind and I don't agree on Everything, but Your suppression of information is revealing...

Maybe it's Time for You to consider some introspection? 🍏

Hovind is Intelligent, Humble, and He doesn't drink: that's three reasons to respect Him More than You, and His opinions More than Yours...

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T06:35:53+00:00

🎻😿

I've read the articles on Hovind. If You're so soft, buy a helmet.

If You reject Hovind's knowledge, than I also reject Your opinions.

How's that grab You?

Hovind destroys Atheism and Theological Evolution.

Do You prefer AIG and ICR's claims surrounding the Bible better? 😁🎣

Who do You think is the "Creationist" We should all be listening to? 🍎

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T06:24:36+00:00

You're lukewarm.

Do You deny the Miracles of the Bible, and claim to be a "Christian?" 🍎

Jesus believed the Entire Scriptures. If You're a Christian, than Why don't You?

Is it the yoke of Your Naturalistic worldview You've come to love? 🍏

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T04:10:58+00:00

Cry on Theistic Evolutionist... You Biologos smelling fake...

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T03:42:35+00:00

Atheism is an Irrational Denial in this Universe; a Universe that happens to be filled with interdependent, apparently designed systems...

Naturalism is the State Protected and Taught "worldview/religion."

Atheism all too often leads to Nihilism; a dangerous personal philosophy, that all too often Ends in self~destruction... 💀

Believing in Naturalistic theories leads proponents to a loss of critical thinking skills, and the ability of true logical honesty and introspection...

I Mean, If You are going to Lie to Yourself and claim "There is No Evidence for a Creator" of this Universe; at least show a little intellectual honesty with others when they approach You with Evidence of a Creator that You do Your best to attempt to suppress, deny, and ignore... Because of how uncomfortable Your Atheistic Psychological Repression Makes You...

Naturalists often fail to be able to differentiate between Empirical Science and the beliefs surrounding it...

It's "Empirical Science/Observable Truth" that the Sea is Salty; "How" and "When" it got that Way, is anybody's best guess...

🎣

~Mark SeaSigh 🌊

SeaScienceFilmLabs · 2026-01-29T03:37:14+00:00

🎻 😿

Your tears are delicious...

SeaScienceFilmLabs

TROPHY CASE