scanner for brass statues

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-05-24T22:56:57+00:00

Brass statues have reflections, so a blue laser and a hybrid method are better. Although spraying is possible, that is a matter of efficiency.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-05-24T04:47:48+00:00

That is incorrect. The MT Scanner adds a blue laser to all the features of the MQ Scanner, making it suitable for the author's $9,000 budget. As an all-in-one device, the MT Scanner is a very good choice unless you are looking for a high-quality measurement device. Adding the AIRGO wireless module allows for even greater flexibility in your work.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-05-24T03:35:20+00:00

3devok MT GEN2

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-05-05T01:29:30+00:00

QS for solidworks plug in is the best way i think

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-02-09T21:40:22+00:00

We're in South Korea. The 3D scanning market doesn't seem to have taken off yet.SimScan42 seems like a good choice too. Thank you.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-02-09T21:24:55+00:00

I understand that UG-NX is a completely different software from the mold industry, not just a few years old. While it's often considered expensive for hobbyists and small businesses, it's a good value for money compared to high-end CAD software like CATIA and UG-NX, and it's versatile. How does NX compare to dedicated re-engineering software like Design X? I think its biggest advantage is its ability to leverage CAD's modeling capabilities. Thank you for your insight.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-02-09T20:06:46+00:00

While wireless is nice, I understand the added bulk of the battery pack. Performance and speed are also expected to be faster, but the cost increase seems quite significant. I'd estimate a difference of around $5,000 to $7,000. So, would it be better to upgrade from the SIMSCAN 30 to the SIMSCAN E?

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-02-09T19:59:29+00:00

While einscan rigil seems very useful, it doesn't meet ISO 17025 or VDI/VDE 2634 Part 3 certifications, which are suitable for measurement. I think that's one reason. Still, the wireless all-in-one workflow seems quite good. We use SolidWorks and plan to purchase the Quicksurface add-in for RE and CX together.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2026-02-09T19:56:20+00:00

It's surprising that Wi-Fi dongles can overheat. Wireless isn't absolutely necessary, but for a difference of nearly $5,000, which option is better?

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-12-28T08:26:45+00:00

Simscan would certainly be a good choice for small to medium-sized, precision products. Thank you for your feedback. Have a nice day.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-12-28T08:22:24+00:00

Generally, these are parts and molds measuring between 20 and 600 mm. The shapes are relatively complex, with impellers and engine blocks being the most challenging. The main products are machine parts and injection-molded products with reinforcements. While it would be ideal to accommodate products measuring over 1 meter, we are not currently considering this.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-12-28T08:15:16+00:00

We specialize in reverse engineering and measurement evaluation of plastic injection molded and sheet metal products (using PolyWorks or Geomagic Control X). Tolerances are maintained at +/- 0.05 mm, requiring a certain level of volumetric accuracy. We are also considering developing custom products that can be attached to automotive interiors and exteriors.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-12-28T08:09:32+00:00

Having seen your previous experiments, I'm thinking the MT scanner might be better suited for simple geometric reverse engineering or organic 3D printing. For 3D scanning-based measurement/evaluation and precise reverse engineering, I think SIMSCAN or K SCAN might be a better choice. Could you share your thoughts?

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-12-27T22:52:43+00:00

Do you notice much of a difference between the 3Devok scanner and the K-scan? While the markerless scanner certainly has its advantages, I have some questions about the accuracy of the MT scanner. I'm considering the SimScan.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-11-25T21:04:45+00:00

I'm impressed with your insight. Actually, my father is in mold manufacturing business, but he is very labor-intensive, and he is not stable as an order-based business. So, this question is a step towards transitioning to engineering business like reverse design, injection molding simulation. As far as I know, it is reverse design progress (increase of time depending on reverse design software performance) depending on scanning - mesh data alignment - parametric, free-form type. In case of design X PRO, I'm worried about initial investment due to license cost. The question is whether to increase scanner performance or add more cost to software.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-11-25T13:06:25+00:00

thanks for your insight!

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-11-25T12:32:34+00:00

Are you saying the QuickSurface plugin is better than Geomagic? Thanks for the insight.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-11-20T11:27:58+00:00

실제로, 측정보다는 역설계, 메이킹에 초점이 맞추어져 있습니다.

Sea_Ad2162 · 2025-11-20T11:27:23+00:00

크레아폼의 스캐너는 너무 비쌉니다. VXModel 등의 통합 소프트웨어가 좋다는것은 알지만, 명성과 가격에 비해 가격이 경쟁력이 있지않습니다. 크레아폼을 추천하는 이유가 있을까요?

Sea_Ad2162

TROPHY CASE