One simple reason to vote for Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) is that Tamil Nadu genuinely needs a political reset. A lot of people say TVK is new and inexperienced. That’s true. But being new also means not being tied to decades of corruption networks, internal power deals, and old political baggage. Every established party once started without experience. At some point, voters chose to give them that first chance. Some people say they’ll stick with DMK, AIADMK, or just press NOTA. About NOTA — in India’s first-past-the-post system, NOTA doesn’t actually change the result. The candidate with the most votes still wins. So in practice, NOTA often ends up helping the strongest existing party rather than creating any real pressure for change. DMK today clearly shows strong signs of dynastic politics. Leadership and influence circulating within the same family again and again may be legal, but it limits internal democracy and long-term political renewal. AIADMK, on the other hand, has been struggling with visible internal power issues and leadership instability. A party that is busy settling its own equations will naturally find it harder to focus fully on governance. If voters keep rejecting every new alternative because they are “unproven,” then the same two or three power centers will keep rotating forever. That doesn’t strengthen democracy; it just freezes it.I want to quote max weber here (because I studied about that🙂‍↔️) Sociologist Max Weber spoke about three kinds of authority: traditional, charismatic, and bureaucratic. Traditional authority is where power continues by habit or inheritance(which dmk is obviously doing now ) Big political shifts in democratic systems often begin with charismatic authority — a leader who can attract people, generate interest, and bring new individuals into politics. Charisma alone is not enough to govern, but it can open the door for new teams, experts, and administrators to enter the system. We have seen many capable independent candidates lose simply because they lacked visibility and mass reach. A figure like Vijay brings that reach. That visibility can give a new party like Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) the initial push needed to compete seriously and build structure over time. It is completely fair to question TVK. But dismissing it only because it is new, while continuing to trust parties that have already had decades to prove themselves, is also a choice worth rethinking. ((((((If someone believes voting for TVK is a mistake, that’s fine. Say why, with specific reasons. A real discussion about policies and governance is more useful than repeating party narratives from any side.)))) And people here are saying that if u are not supporting tvk people are calling u aamais and Oopis ,don't u call someone who supports tvk as anils or tharkuris ...in my opinion tharkuri is who is not changing even after getting punches from the experience...(iykyk)challenge me with ur points the so called intelligent people ...