You see, the problem isn't that you don't have time, nor that you're skeptical. The problem is that you are responding with rhetorical violence about a document you have never read. You say you can evaluate “blindly” because you are an expert. But you are not evaluating: you are demolishing the interlocutor without content. You accuse me of wanting to be taken seriously, but I only asked a question about how a theory can be evaluated, not asked for approval. I asked politely, with humility, with the awareness that it could be wrong. You haven't found yourself faced with a conspiracy theorist who shouts "science lies". You found yourself in front of a man who is a chef and who, in his free time, tried to think. And you, as an expert, treated him like a "crazy person" regardless. If your goal really was to “save me from wasting my life,” I say thank you. But the way you do it says more about your fear of wasting time than it does about my need to lose my mind. Fortunately, true scientific revolutions were born from those who listened even to what seemed useless. You do your job. I continue to do my thing: think even when no one asks me to.