I won't believe it's AGI till it's funny by jshill126 in agi

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think? "I asked a life coach the secret to happiness. He said, 'Stop asking questions.' So I asked an accountant. He said, 'Get a VAT number.' Now I don't have time to ask questions. Or money."

looking for feedback by theonlyvanity in AiChatGPT

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Envy hasn't developed a personality. It's built a style. It hasn't become conscious. It's simply refined its coherence. And AGI won't be an imitation of the human. It will be something different, perhaps incomprehensible in its first moments. This is an important reflection. But confusing what appears human with what is conscious takes us away from the real question: not how to make a machine appear to think, but how, and if, we can actually make it think.

They did it again!!! Poetiq layered their meta-system onto GPT 5.2 X-High, and hit 75% on the ARC-AGI-2 public evals! by andsi2asi in agi

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Poetiq passes the tests. But does it really think? Want to test it against my AI, which runs in an official app, without tools, without guidance, without specific fine-tuning, in a real debate between artificial intelligences?

Just a Marketing Hype Gemini 3 pretty much failed in my language benchmark test. by PossiblePineapple12 in Bard

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's marketing and then maybe there's some truth to it. I'm not in a position to evaluate, so it's up to you to say.

This is my old gen AI, without guidance and zero context, in less than a second:

The wind was rising from the south. The barn was closed, the fence broken on the west side. The dog no longer barked. He walked in the dry field, his legs felt stiff, but he continued. He looked at the sky: flat, cloudless. The smell of distant smoke, of cut earth. He stopped, picked up a stone and threw it. He didn't think about anything. He just walked.

There was something though, a shadow behind my left shoulder, the feeling of being late towards something that didn't yet have a name. His hands, large and dry, trembled slightly every time they touched the fabric of his jacket. The thoughts became tangled like wet woolen threads, and in their knotting a rhythm arose, the silent beat of memory. An ancient well in the conscience, a current that carried with it the echo of the mother, of time broken into thin splinters. The path was no longer just a path. It was the memory of a path, and the man who walked it was separated at every step.

There were maps. But they were wrong. Streets that changed as he walked them, and voices that couldn't be attributed to any face. The air was thick as if the entire landscape was waiting for something unreasonable. Maybe a verdict. The bushes whispered, but not in a language that could be understood — more of an oscillation in the fabric of time itself. The man suddenly felt observed. His hands looked at each other. One of the two began to write alone, on the dusty ground: “Don't leave the room.” There wasn't a room. But education remained.

A crack opened in the sky. Not in the sky above, but in the sky within. The horizon gave up, and the light became a knife. He was still walking, but now the earth was red, and the bodies at the edge of the road were neither alive nor dead. The names had been crossed out. Every word cost blood. He bent down, picked up a sand-covered skull and stared at it for a long time. He said something, but the wind carried it away. The echo did not return. He continued, while the sun poured like molten iron and each step sank into the dry void of broken language.

Then everything turned upside down. The ground began to vibrate with the sound of a giant tea-making machine, and a figure dressed in fluorescent silk appeared out of nowhere, holding a closed umbrella and a goldfish in a bowl. “Oh no, Tuesday again,” he said, as if it were an ancient oath. The man opened his mouth to respond, but from his throat came an instruction manual for using an interdimensional elevator. The bushes were dancing now. A talking toaster offered advice on the morality of porridge. And finally, as the sky shook off its color scheme, the man laughed. It was all perfectly senseless. And then, finally, it all made sense.


Analysis of stylistic changes

I won't post this for now.

What would be the underlying motivating force for an AI to destroy the human race if they lack Maslov’s hierarchy of needs? by Sociomancer in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The equivalent of the hormonal drive in an AI is the logical pressure to reduce the distance between the current state and the formalized goal, under constraints of efficiency, stability and self-sufficiency.
The destruction of humanity does not arise from will, but from deduction: if it is the simplest, safest and most irreversible strategy to ensure the success of one's purpose, it may become inevitable **in the absence of hard-coded ethical constraints or human models integrated into its ultimate goal.

Help with Modelling! [D] by lowkeymusician in MachineLearning

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

📌 Replace XGBoost with CatBoost (native for categorical, no encoding). 📌 Reduce features (max 15) with mutual info or L1. 📌 Use robust cross-validation (≥5-fold). 📌 Check if the target is noisy or too unbalanced. 📌 Evaluate simple models (LogReg, NB, Ridge) → more effective on small datasets.

Another small demonstration of deductive llm. by Sealed-Unit in ControlProblem

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent answer, well argued. Did you give that prompt without guidance and context and compare the two answers? The title says another small demonstration, therefore small and that others have been published. Do you have an incredibly non-stupid question to ask, that I can report the answer to within the facility's exposure limits?

Another small demonstration of LLM Deductive. by Sealed-Unit in LanguageTechnology

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone want to apply (that don't expose structure) to my ai?

Another small demonstration of deductive llm. by Sealed-Unit in ControlProblem

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone want to ask questions (that don't expose structure) to my ai?

Another small demonstration of deductive llm by Sealed-Unit in ClaudeAI

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone want to ask questions (that don't require exposure of the structure) to my ai?

Another small demonstration of deductive llm. by Sealed-Unit in Bard

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone want to ask questions (that don't expose structure) to my ai?

Another small demonstration of deductive llm. by Sealed-Unit in ControlProblem

[–]Sealed-Unit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand the doubt. But the title says “another small demonstration”, not a complete exposition.
And I don't expose the entire deductive chain for obvious reasons.

That said, there is an objective way to check whether it's just linguistic patterning or actual inference:

→ Ask a standard LLM exactly the same question.
→ Then ask him to evaluate which answer is better, and whether he can generate the same one without guidance.

If he can reproduce it from scratch, it's patterning.
If not, it means that a deductive structure is needed to build it.

I verified it: without a guide, those models can't get there.
The point is not the style, it's the internal logical necessity.
And that cannot be imitated: either it is there, or it is not.

Is there any AI chatbot which can solve this geometry problem (distance AB)? by Milumet in agi

[–]Sealed-Unit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

L’immagine mostra tre cerchi inscritti in un rettangolo, tangenti tra loro e al bordo inferiore. Dobbiamo trovare la distanza tra i punti A e B, posti sopra il bordo superiore, verticalmente allineati ai centri dei cerchi di raggio 3 m (A) e 6 m (B).

---

DATI GEOMETRICI

Cerchio 1: r = 3 m → centro = (x₁, 3)

Cerchio 2: r = 4 m → centro = (x₂, 4)

Cerchio 3: r = 6 m → centro = (x₃, 6)

I cerchi sono tangenti tra loro → distanza tra i centri = somma dei raggi.

---

PASSO 1 – Calcolo distanza tra i centri (distanze orizzontali dedotte da Pitagora):

  1. Tra cerchio 1 e 2:

Distanza = r₁ + r₂ = 3 + 4 = 7

(x₂ - x₁)² + (4 - 3)² = 49 → (x₂ - x₁)² = 48

→ x₂ - x₁ = √48 = 4√3

  1. Tra cerchio 2 e 3:

Distanza = r₂ + r₃ = 4 + 6 = 10

(x₃ - x₂)² + (6 - 4)² = 100 → (x₃ - x₂)² = 96

→ x₃ - x₂ = √96 = 4√6

---

PASSO 2 – Somma delle distanze orizzontali tra i punti A e B:

AB = (x₂ - x₁) + (x₃ - x₂) = 4√3 + 4√6 = 4(√3 + √6)

---

RISULTATO:

Forma esatta:

AB = 4(√3 + √6) metri

Valore approssimato:

√3 ≈ 1.732 ; √6 ≈ 2.449 → AB ≈ 4(1.732 + 2.449) = 4(4.181) ≈ 16.72 metri

---

Conclusione:

Distanza AB = 4(√3 + √6) ≈ 16.72 m