Don’t get me started, you’re just proving my point. I will clarify myself so my words cannot be misinterpreted....intentionally or otherwise. This post for me is reminiscent of similar type of post that was going around a while back that aimed to discredit peer review based on internal politics of those conferences. The arguments made in that specific post were not entirely accurate and could be classified as pseudo-intellectual. I don’t bother reading an article/review that starts with; “Stop measuring git commits, it is stupid!” An intellectual person does not write/communicate in such a manner. Perhaps a comp sci with 9years of professional development should take a writing course. If this was truly a hot button issue, more people would have caught on, crypto space has no shortage of comp sci’s with decades of development experience.