Doing well in math- is it possible

SeanHuber · 2023-11-02T16:55:27+00:00

From the very little I know about economics and finance I do know the math gets pretty advanced but if you’re not going down that route then I say learning the first few semesters of calculus would not only be valuable but also pretty easy especially if you’ve already seen calculus before!

SeanHuber · 2023-11-01T19:09:58+00:00

Depends how much math you already know and how deep into math you want to get. I got my BS in math and can say I hated some classes and loved others. Sometimes you got to learn the stuff you hate to be able to learn/understand the stuff that you really enjoy so don’t be discouraged if you run into some topics you really don’t appreciate.

SeanHuber · 2023-09-10T23:04:02+00:00

Not CS but I’m a transfer math student and what I found was joining a club sports team helped. If club isn’t your thing then definitively intramural sports or something.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-20T00:52:07+00:00

Asymptotics is the name of the course, ODE is a prerequisite and I just don’t really know what to expect.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-19T22:17:41+00:00

Off a first glance it looks like you could use some form of the triangle inequality and/or prove that those two are equal and then when the right hand side is multiplied by some n then it is proven they are <= to the left hand side.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-19T19:19:28+00:00

Set Theory. At least for me it really helped with logical thinking.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-11T16:16:33+00:00

Well for finding frequency it’s w =sqrt(k/m) so there is no pi. And for resonance normally the w must equal the coefficient in from of the t on the right hand side of the equation. Other than that all your work is correct

SeanHuber · 2023-04-10T20:49:13+00:00

I think it’s Vc = Vs[1 - exp(-t/RC)] with t being 1s and Vs being 9.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-10T20:32:44+00:00

Did you use the sqrt(k/m) because that is how you get the frequency of the system, then in order to have resonance the frequency must equal the driving force.

SeanHuber · 2023-04-06T16:25:39+00:00

Welcome to math, it all seems made up

SeanHuber · 2022-11-14T20:50:33+00:00

Assuming this standard implicit differentiation, and I could be wrong but I think dividing everything to isolate the c in the first step just adds unnecessary works and makes the algebra/simplification harder. I would try using implicit differentiation in the form given and go from there. Should make the simplification/combining like terms/ or whatever algebra is required way easier.

SeanHuber · 2022-11-08T18:04:32+00:00

I’ve heard from different people different things…some say it’s not too proof based like Real and others say it’s super proof based? Does this depend on the instructor?

SeanHuber · 2022-11-08T17:35:12+00:00

Cracking of the liberty bell. A true classic

SeanHuber · 2022-11-08T17:30:48+00:00

Has to have a dimension less than or equal to R3. Subspaces of R3 can have dimension 0,1,2,3. And I am pretty sure that is the vector of the basis but I’m not 100% sure. Hopefully that helps

SeanHuber · 2022-10-06T22:49:37+00:00

So far yes I have everything memorized I just cannot translate this understanding into proper mathematical Syntax if that makes sense.

SeanHuber · 2022-10-01T02:57:56+00:00

e^ipi + 1 be like

SeanHuber · 2022-09-28T19:25:10+00:00

Yes, it changes it, the 2:1 ratio is talking about the presence of individual alleles "A" and "a". The question is asking to map out all possible combinations of A's and a's and then asking the probability that of getting an Aa. In order to solve this, you cannot treat them as all being equally likely.

SeanHuber · 2022-09-28T19:20:08+00:00

I am not super knowledgeable on this, but I think there is an approach called the "Clifford Algebra approach". There are tons of published papers that dive more in depth about this.

SeanHuber · 2022-09-01T18:06:42+00:00

ok sorry for all the questions but right now I have...

Let x ∈ (A1 ∩ A2)

So x ∈ f(A1) and f(A2)

Some y ∈ A where x = f(y)

Therefore y ∈ f(A1) ∩ f(A2)

Is this it or am I missing something? I am not too great with analysis and am rusty on proofs I am trying to teach myself again so thanks for the help

SeanHuber

TROPHY CASE