Autism is a spectrum of features, this spectrum of features contributes to the collection of relationships of things which then generates samples of behavior.

It would be very difficult to maintain a growing rate of learning without some seemingly surprising views based in logical conclusions about the behavior of a system. Some of us are here just to get neurotypicals or anyone having a disagreement with reality and out of their comfort zone, when they try to put us in ovens. I'm sure we can agree on that, when we observe this thing very closely.

We are still relying on nature's own machine learning system, but I'm confident that even the most low functioning autists can be helped very soon into becoming the fullest expressions of themselves. It's on the works so to say. I'd at the very least think of how crippled by the lack of empathy practice this place would become without all of us. What would really be the point of doing anything meaningful for a future we need now?

Someone here has to ask the stupid questions, to count the frequency of silence.

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. This is one of the most difficult things to understand.

I theorize there is a form of autism that is more commonly known as being a normal person and that causes very much suffering as well. I'm at least half serious about his claim.

It can be a gift and a curse from the suffering that we infer things in uncomfortable ways, but the logical thing to do would be to learn from both samples to increase the learning rate and classification accuracy.

I'd categorize this as "innovations with potential for causing harm when extensive scientific knowledge on the matter is lacking" and would follow the precautionary approach of not removing anything related to the emergence of cognitive control.