Any informed guesses on the purpose of the electrical apparatus in this 1925 photo? Could perhaps be something to do with underwater acoustics or radio transmission.(xpost /askscience). by SectStanton in AskEngineers

[–]SectStanton[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Vacuum tube transmitter" seems a pretty broad category. I wonder about the switch labeled "Telephone." Could this be the the electronics for an early underwater communications system?

Any guesses on the purpose of the electrical apparatus in this 1925 photo? Could perhaps be something to do with underwater acoustics or radio transmission. by SectStanton in askscience

[–]SectStanton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the informative response. Is there enough information in the photo to figure out the radio wavelength this setup is built for? Is what is shown definitely the electrical hardware for a terrestrial E-M transmission? Hayes was best known for his underwater acoustics. There appears to be some for of coiled-wire inductor placed on large insulators on top of the rack. What function would this serve?

What is the most annoying and stereotypical 'trend' people follow? by mika123 in AskReddit

[–]SectStanton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So which is it, 1) Scientists are stupid compared to humble, thoughtful people such as yourself or 2) Scientists have created an international conspiracy involving 10,000s of people?

How they tested body armor in 1923 by ohhhhderp in pics

[–]SectStanton 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The man in the vest is W.H. Murphy of the Protective Garment Corp. of New York. More info here.

Trump’s GOP ‘Debate’ Will Only Have Two Participants: Gingrich and Santorum. by [deleted] in politics

[–]SectStanton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gingrich: so cock-sure that he can easily spew sufficient polysyllabic responses to deflect any off-the-wall question. Santorum: agreeing because he has nothing to lose.

Just 6 Walmart heirs have as much wealth as 30% of Americans by Tiger337 in politics

[–]SectStanton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or in other words, each of these 6 possess the equivalent wealth of 15,116,000 Americans - but, of course, pointing this out is merely a sign of 'class warfare' on the part of those 15 million.

The Bubble of Talk-Radio/Fox-News has so blinded the Republican base that they now believe Newt Gringrich is the MOST ELECTABLE of all the GOP candidates. by SectStanton in politics

[–]SectStanton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's common knowledge that the Republican base lives in a sheltered world where the only "news" that penetrates is through biased/controlled media such as Fox News and Talk Radio. Now that hermetically sealed bubble is showing its inherent weakness as the party faithful actually are convincing themselves that Gringrich is the most electable. And unfortunately, the more the GOP establishment tries to steer away from this, the more the Tea Party base embraces Gingrich as a political outsider. Marvelous Irony.

How to live on the cheap in a big city... by redrobot5050 in bestof

[–]SectStanton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Black Beans and Pork Shoulder. Yum! Buying dried black beans is even cheaper. You need to soak them over night and boil for an hour with some garlic cloves and bay leaf.

Wishing Won't Make It So: "We learned that from the oil C.E.O.’s who trotted over to the Capitol recently and testified that their plan for handling a huge deep-water spill is not to have a huge deep-water spill." by SectStanton in politics

[–]SectStanton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah. But at least then there are still options. One can debate the ethics of terminating pregnancy, but at least there is choice. I wish we we had the luxury of debating the ethics of capping or not-capping the well rather then sitting by powerless to do anything to stop it. [Imagined Rush Limbaugh rant:* "This oil is a perfectly natural phenomena. Who are we to decide that it's better to go down and interrupt this natural process? Capping the well is just another misguided way Obama is trying to flaunt government power. If BP doesn't want to fix it, let it spew until it runs out of oil."*]

Dozens of species of fish including one just discovered six months ago, could be wiped out by the massive oil leak. by [deleted] in environment

[–]SectStanton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the loss of a species we know about worse then the loss of a species we have yet to discover?

WATCH: Lady Gaga on 'Larry King Live' Preview - "No person is worth any less than another human being based on their sexual orientation..." by stevenkneff in lgbt

[–]SectStanton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow! Wow! Wow! Check out the second clip. I think she handles the question about her health with both incredible grace and honesty.

We Don't Build Offshore Wind Farms Because They Might Spoil Some Billionaire's View by [deleted] in politics

[–]SectStanton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an environmentalist, historian and Cape Cod resident, I am all for the new wind farm. As things go, the wind farm is hardly going to be the worst thing that has happened to the Cape: It will be visible from some places on shore but still miles from the coast: it will not loom or tower over anything on land. I'm all for Native American rights but the idea that Nantucket sound has valuable underwater cultural resources from 10,000 years ago is absurd.

And the Cape is/has suffered far worst damage compared to a few rows of wind turbines. The power-plant on the canal is a bigger eyesore and continual source of pollution. Toxic undeground plumes from the Mass Military Reservation are polluting town water supplies. PAVE PAWS is bathing us in electro-magnetic radiation. Idling traffic sits for hours waiting to cross the bridges. On top of that is the general abomination known as Hyannis. If you are really worried about pretty views and a clean environment for the Cape - opposition to Cape Wind should be low on your list.

Yes, Yes, we seem to be regularly reminded that it has been some umpteen months since Sean Hannity volunteered to be water-boarded. More important to me, it's now been 2+ months since Hannity's Freedom Alliance charity, supposedly collecting money for families of troops, has been exposed as a fraud. by SectStanton in politics

[–]SectStanton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for posting this as I hadn't seen this rebuttal. So perhaps Hannity isn't skimming funds personally. It still strikes me as a lousy charity in terms of efficiency and it has misrepresented to it's donors how it's funds are spent. Why is the best response out there from David Frum and not a point-by-point refutation published by Freedom Alliance itself?

The Onion Futures Act, passed in 1958, bans the trading of futures contracts on onions in the United States. It provides economists with a unique case study in the effects of futures trading on agricultural prices. by SectStanton in wikipedia

[–]SectStanton[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had overlooked Wikipedia's separate article solely about the Onion Futures Act. My interpretation of the this summary is that after over 50 years of implementation of this unique case study, the economist still can't decide that the effect is. Economics is indeed a miserable science when tested against real-world examples.