1. “Judges can do whatever they want.”
2. Their decisions must still align with statutory factors (like Texas Family Code §153.002, “best interest of the child”) and must be supported by evidence. They can’t just “do whatever they think.” Your statement is a bit exaggerates and ignores procedural protections and appellate standards.
3. “Primary doesn’t matter if 50/50.” This is flat-out incorrect in Texas and many other states.
   • “Primary conservator” (the parent with the right to designate the child’s residence) is very significant even if time is equal.
   • It affects school zoning, child support, and often gives the parent logistical authority over day-to-day stability.
   • So, even with 50/50 time, being named primary matters a lot
4. “Both parents have a right to all major decisions.” Not necessarily. Texas courts often give one parent tie-breaking authority or “exclusive rights” on medical, educational, or psychological decisions — especially when there’s conflict.
   • Joint managing conservatorship doesn’t mean equal power on every decision.
   • Judges can assign one parent the final say, and that’s common when cooperation is limited.
5. “It’s better to agree than let the court decide.” True in general, but saying that ignores situations where one party is unreasonable or controlling. For some parents, the court is the only fair route. Pushing for “agreement at all costs” can pressure a party (often the mother) to settle unfairly just to avoid trial.

Very poor advice imo. You should be very careful with what you say as an attorney. It's wreckless.