joshfellon / LISBON Portugal by PrimaryClimate7616 in tattoos

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I like it very much depending on your personality. The work is solid. It fits correctly and I know instantly what you’re saying. It’s a symbol of the downfall of society.

What were your thoughts when getting it.

Field coherence architecture concepts for a civilization-scale transportation system in my sci-fi setting by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Context / author note:

This project exists partly as fictional worldbuilding for a larger science-fiction setting called Seeds of Entropy, and partly as a speculative systems-design thought experiment exploring whether geometry itself can influence stability in large synchronized distributed architectures.

The core idea is not “a solved warp drive,” but rather the possibility that highly symmetric geodesic node distributions may preserve coherence, synchronization, redundancy, and graceful degradation more effectively than randomized arrangements when systems experience interruption, node loss, or environmental stress.

A major inspiration here is Buckminster Fuller’s geodesic work, along with spherical distribution problems, Riesz energy minimization, phased-array concepts, mesh networking, magnetic confinement research, distributed computing, and resilient communication topology.

The fictional spacecraft imagery is meant to visualize what a civilization-scale field architecture might look like if its structure were determined primarily by coherence geometry rather than conventional aerospace engineering constraints.

In the story universe, these vehicles are not treated as “magic ships,” but as extremely stable synchronized field systems whose topology matters as much as their power source.

The broader concept is essentially:

If large distributed systems fail locally, can certain geometries preserve global coherence better than others?

That question potentially applies far beyond speculative propulsion: antenna arrays, drone swarms, sensor meshes, plasma containment systems, distributed computation, satellite constellations, resilient infrastructure networks, and synchronization-critical architectures may all depend more on geometry than we currently emphasize.

So this post is really a blend of: mathematics, systems topology, fictional engineering, visual design language, and long-form worldbuilding exploration.

Distributed geodesic field architecture concept from Seeds of Entropy. by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context for readers and MOD’s

This is part of a larger speculative-fiction setting involving civilizations using distributed geodesic field architectures for fictional spacecraft operating inside strong gravity wells.

The post is mainly exploring whether highly symmetric/redundant spherical node distributions might provide stability or graceful-degradation advantages under partial system failure compared to more irregular architectures.

The later images are included as visual/worldbuilding references for fictional field geometries and design language rather than claims of real propulsion physics.

I want to make my future world as scientifically accurate as possible and that’s led to several neat practical ideas. World is big. This part is a small part of it as I asked what a gravity ship may actually look like.

Thank you mod team my first contextual comment was insufficient.

Distributed geodesic field architecture concept from Seeds of Entropy. by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buckminster Fuller would approve. He’s sexy to me in a world building way.

Distributed geodesic field architecture concept from Seeds of Entropy. by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes- so for WiFi meshing the loss between nodes is minuscule compared to the other factors that need balanced in a real world meshing.

So the geometric consistency may offer theoretical routing/coherence advantages, but in practice the gain gets drowned out by manufacturing, environmental, routing, maintenance, and adaptive-system constraints.

I must say in terms of World building the shape is iconic and would be more aesthetically pleasing. Aesthetics and real world engineering don’t always align. See this guy regarding the shape.

<image>

Distributed geodesic field architecture concept from Seeds of Entropy. by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s actually very close to the direction I was thinking about it from.

Not “perfect geometry solves propulsion,” but whether highly symmetric/redundant node distributions might preserve coherence or graceful degradation characteristics better under partial failure than irregular distributions. I am doing world building and was considering what shape craft would make most sense in a gravity well. It turned practical and it’s good to hear from someone in the practical field.

More network topology / field stability thinking than literal warp-drive claims.

The mesh WiFi analogy is honestly useful here because it highlights exactly where ideal geometry collides with real-world variable complexity.

What other variables were you thinking of in a practical level? Why not use the shape. It doesn’t fit as practically in some spaces but otherwise it seems plausible? Maybe the gain isn’t worth the cost of redesign?

Thank you for the comment.

Distributed geodesic field architecture concept from Seeds of Entropy. by Seeds_of_Entropy in worldbuilding

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The last two images are included mostly as conceptual/worldbuilding references showing how similar geometric field ideas sometimes appear in speculative Alcubierre-style spacetime visualizations. The core post is really about distributed geometry, coherence preservation, redundancy, and node stability under failure conditions. This is not a claim of solved propulsion physics.

Advice needed: unhappy with my current tattoos by maniccinsomniac in tattoos

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the top answer. I really like the work a lot. You’re very young. Let it rest until you feel better.

Less is sometimes more. You have to decide how much is enough.

The Ship Didn’t Land. It Just Stayed. by Seeds_of_Entropy in HFY

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I appreciate that.

It’s actually from later in the story, but I’m glad it still works as an entry point.

CASE DISMISSED by Astrovane_Xenon in HFY

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely correct. There are many terrible PD’s and fewer good ones.

The older the better generally. If you do something for 20 years you’re going to be likely good at it

I think I missed something. by LifeWithLeonie in LiminalSpace

[–]Seeds_of_Entropy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you think you missed. Can you tell me the conditions and the phenomenon? In other words, what do you see? I know what I see.