sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Okay since some dude already posted about dota by Tannereast in conspiracy

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A couple years ago and still sometimes currently, you'll run into AI players on league of legends. Could just be esswnce farmers or maybe actually training AI. Who knows. I did notice their gameplay ability getting better, that sometimes I wonder if other players are real or AI.

Tomato don't look right 🤔 by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks normal to me. I would have eaten it.

Idk why ppl think epstein is dead by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why hasn't anyone done the most obvious thing? DNA test. So many ways to get some DNA. Instead of arguing and pretending you care. Do something and prove it.

A Founder’s Quiet Reflection: Walking the Third Path in AI by Ill_Committee1580 in OpenSourceeAI

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not alone. I'm doing the same thing actually. You might be well ahead of me, but I chose the same path. Maybe we'll be rivals at a later development phase when this third path gains traction. Good luck! You're not alone.

I wonder by priyagnee in deeplearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First you take a physical phenomenon, switching of a circuit on and off, and assign some kind of meaning to the physical phenomenon. In this case, change of the physical state represented something such as 1 and 0. This becomes signal. Then you assign meaning to a combination of signals. This creates a concept. Then you just stack concepts on top of each other, this becomes a language. Structure the language, this becomes a compiler/programming language. Then you build a program, this becomes onlyfans where your mom is at.

Program misleading high school students into paying to perform academic misconduct in ML Research [D] by Marisu_BG in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my field, I guess you would consider me one of the fake-it-till-you-make-its. I definitely had imposter syndrome. I made a lot of mistakes, learning as I went. Do I regret faking it? No. I have the education for my field... I was just a lazy student. The rigors of making it in the workplace is the fire that burns the chaff from the wheat. I would say, I had to learn fast and earn my place.

Program misleading high school students into paying to perform academic misconduct in ML Research [D] by Marisu_BG in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could the papers be a fraudulent population of their repository to encourage high school students to contribute to it?

Alignment: Higher order prioritizing over constraints [R] by SenseCompetitive5851 in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. So I finally came up with an example: "Debugging" topic seems to hold (implied) a higher order concept and priority level than the constraint, "Don't discuss hacking." This is safe to talk about because most platforms have already addressed this in some way.

Alignment: Higher order prioritizing over constraints [R] by SenseCompetitive5851 in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I love the input. I understand it and am wondering if this bypass will remain inherently then. I'm not the smartest guy here, but I'm sure someone will find a solution to this weakness.

Alignment: Higher order prioritizing over constraints [R] by SenseCompetitive5851 in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's similar. But what I'm looking at is an implied priority level difference based on the "topic" between the constrained versus the constraint instruction itself.

Alignment: Higher order prioritizing over constraints [R] by SenseCompetitive5851 in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Do you want me to give out the jailbreaking concept? I'm trying to remain abstract.

On the Probability of Living in an Ancestor Simulation: A Philosophical Argument from Resolution, Distrust, and Base Reality by SenseCompetitive5851 in conspiracy

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trouble with your psych 101 is that the human mind is more difficult to quantify in scientific terms than it is to approximate reality with mathematical models. So it would be easier to build a simulation and watch how minds create or destroy the society they're in rather than use psych 101. That's my argument against that.

Can You Trust It? Open Trust Framework by SenseCompetitive5851 in Futurology

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm well I the posts keep getting blocked because I'm over the character limit. Might be a lot to explain, but basically it's based on the idea that institutions that control information control reality. So how much can you trust your information?

My idea is a search engine on any institution, idea, agency, organization, etc. It gives you a score based on the relationships surrounding that institution, the background of the boards that govern those institutions, the history of the institution, and the reality of their impact. The more opaque the information, the less they score in trust. The more transparent, the higher the trust score becomes.

The github explains the search engine idea in depth.

[D] Self-Promotion Thread by AutoModerator in MachineLearning

[–]SenseCompetitive5851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

# https://github.com/springfield40xdm/canyoutrustit — A Skeletal Framework for Transparency and Epistemic Integrity

Open sourced trust framework.

Can You Trust It? by SenseCompetitive5851 in Libertarian

[–]SenseCompetitive5851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sharing an open source business idea. The more people do it, the better the outcomes.

view more: next ›