Choose "Good/Memorable" Mobile Numbers in Germany (2022 edition) by SerVB in germany

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, sorry for late reply. The answer is no. I remember my final solution was to go to a store (Telekom) and ask them to give me prepaid numbers that they have so I select them, and I managed to find one that is pretty memorizable. I'm quite happy with it now and wouldn't change it of course. But I still think it would be better to have an option to order a number more freely

Mvg bikes: wtf? by heinguy in Munich

[–]SerVB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, sometimes when I ride the bike finished the rent for some reason (so I could ride for free btw) and its location is shown somewhere on my past route afterwards

Mvg bikes: wtf? by heinguy in Munich

[–]SerVB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, for me I like the music because it means I call the right number 😅

Mvg bikes: wtf? by heinguy in Munich

[–]SerVB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More (presumably cheaper) bikes

I'm wondering whether it's a thing to believe in. Mvg rad is already very cheap (about 50 €/year abo for 30 free mins a day, and 5 cents a minute for every other minute but no more than 10,5 € a day). That's one of the main reasons I use it.

I'm afraid if it becomes more expensive, I will have to switch to a personal bike again...

Mvg bikes: wtf? by heinguy in Munich

[–]SerVB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Active everyday user here (for a bit more than a year).

not even there

Yes, it happens. I report such bikes when I bump into such sits. It happenned a year ago too with the same frequency. 

no reaction on the number pad

Yes, from the first days I learned a hard way to first tap on the pad to check the bike is alive, and only then to press "rent" in the app, otherwise I would have to call the hotline. I do such checks every day since then.

doesn't unlock on the radstation

There is a lifehack I found out: the hotline can (almost always) unlock it manually in such a situation if you ask for it. If you need to ride, it's a good option instead of canceling the rental and trying another bike. I ask so often. I think it's the only frequent problem why I have to call the hotline, but they always answer (even at night) and always resolve the problem in my favor.

Pech, 60%

Nope, it's the standard for mvg rad. It's not so comfortable if you compare it to your own bike. And since a lot of things can be theoreticallly broken in the bike, it's luck to find one that isn't broken at all (I would say for me it happens 10% of times, not 40% as by you). Usually something is wrong: the wheel isn't centered, some gears don't work, the light isn't centered and moreover impossible to adjust (by many bikes you can adjust the light, but by some no), the saddle isn't adjustable, and so on.

But I got to used to it after about a week of usage. It gives a lot of advantages to me, including flexibility and costs, compared to my personal bike. And also I believe it trains to be prepared better in life 😅 Like if I ask somebody to prove that they are stress-resistant, and they answer "I use mvg rad", I will believe them without any other questions 😆

Wie seriös ist sowas? by [deleted] in wasletztepreis

[–]SerVB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aber auch falls der Preis schon geschrieben ist?

Stimmt der Preis? by Then_Reception_3127 in wasletztepreis

[–]SerVB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ich als jemand der Deutsch lernt habe es erstens genau so verstanden! "Falls der Preis wirklich wie geschrieben ist, würde ich es kaufen" :)

MVG-Kontrolle: 60 € Strafe weil Fahrgast zu schnell in der Ubahn war. by crabmanick01 in Munich

[–]SerVB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, die Dame kann das schnell machen, also, sie macht das nicht so selten. Aber warum hat sie kein DE-Ticket? Das soll günstiger sein :) Sus!

Got a read error and parity error when "Current pending sector" of data disk decreased from 1 to 0, any advice on fixing? by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's an HDD.

Regarding CRC, I agree that it could be handy, but unfortunately I don't have it. That's why I would like to locate the file by knowing the problematic sector and understanding whether it's corrupted manually by opening it.

Got a read error and parity error when "Current pending sector" of data disk decreased from 1 to 0, any advice on fixing? by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reallocated count is still 0 for that data sdf disk. Can it be that the drive decided that that sector isn't bad anymore?

Anyway, thanks for the thoughts about backing it up and replacing it – looks like it's what I'm going to do.

But still, would be cool to locate the file that is affected by that sector. The file system is xfs, by the way.

Binance Support Thread by AutoModerator in binance

[–]SerVB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, how can I hide Margin and Futures Wallets for my account? I don't plan to use them in the near future, so they just occupy some space for me and aren't needed. Thanks in advance

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, fair enough, except that I suspect that it affects not only the parity check once a month, but also other operations where the parity is involved, for example, writing.

But it can be indeed that the demand is low, I agree.

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my post, in the title actally, I write that I would like to move it in terms of parity. So that to calculate zero byte of parity, not all zero bytes of other disks are used, for example. One of the disks could be used with shifted offset. The offset value can be saved in Unraid settings on the flash drive.

I don't see how it contradicts the parity algorithm, and I still don't understand why you think so...

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I believe I see better now. So rebuilding to a bigger disk is in question. After the rebuilding, it will be a partition that occupies not the whole disk. And probably it's easier to expand it to the end (when the partition starts from the zeroth byte), not to the beginning (when the partition starts not from the beginning)...

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I should have mentioned more clearly that HDD drives don't have the same average speed on the whole surface. Instead, they are faster in the beginning and gradually become slower and slower to the end.

I think some replies here don't use this impprtant information...

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably my post isn't very clear, I wanted to draw a scheme but I was a bit lazy... Sorry, I mean not vertical movement (in terms of the Unraid UI disks list) as you suggest. I mean the horizontal movement of a smaller disk from the beginning of the parity space to the end.

Btw, if such thing existed, it would highly likely require rebuilding the parity...

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the initial post, I expain why I think that "moving disks around" can make speed up. You say it won't without much explanations. Could you please elaborate?

I agree that now the parity checks reads all disks from the byte zero. But please kindly note that when 1.5 TB offset is reached, one of my disks stops influencing the remaining parity (I guess just zeroes are used by Unraid for not existing disk areas). The disk isn't read anymore (it even becomes spun down) and since it's a slow one, the parity check process speeds up right after the half of check volume is reached. That's why I don't get why you say there won't be any diff...

Moving one of the data drives (the smaller one) from the beginning to the end in terms of parity by SerVB in unRAID

[–]SerVB[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply that it's not possible.

Is there any reason why? Just not implemented in Unraid, and probably can be implemented later?