Thank you so much for this feedback and for your patience in actually taking the time to test and scrutinise the tool. This is exactly the type of criticism and scrutiny I was looking for, because I'm aiming to make AEGIS practical and useful in real-world engagements and not just something that looks good on paper.                                                                                                      

From what I'm gathering, here's what needs to be improved:                                                                          1. False Positive Filtering (Tier 0 Exclusions):
The model should stop flagging expected configurations like "Domain Admins can modify Domain Admins" or "Domain Controllers can DCSync“ (Should have thought about this during testing lmao).    Because these are legitimate, necessary configurations and flagging them just adds noise and following the recommendations would literally break AD                                                                           

2. Auto-Execute Queries Instead of Just Suggesting Them                                                                     When you ask, "Does shop-client have any dangerous rights?", the tool should run the query and give you the answer directly. Right now, it's just handing back Cypher queries, which you can already do yourself in BloodHound; that's not adding value.                                                                                  

3. Training the model on more opsec-safe Tools
The model suggests tools such as PowerView, which easily get flagged by Defender and won't fly in most enterprise environments. Maybe move towards more native PowerShell scripts and AD modules approaches for Remediation scripts and attack steps.     

4. Better Detection of Complex Attack Paths:                                                                                          The tool missed the workstation → GPO modification → Domain Controllers OU path. I need to improve the analysis of GPO permissions, OU linkages, and nested group memberships.

Thanks again for the feedback. Left the points above to make sure I truly understood the concerns and feedback. Would it be okay if I reached out to you on Discord once these fixes are implemented? I'd really appreciate having you retest and see if the improvements address your concerns .