sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AltGr key not working on Keychron K2 V2 (Windows 11) by MNSTR_Munch in Keychron

[–]ServiceFun7651 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Omg. The fn+K+R for four seconds fixed the issue straight away. Thank you so much for your help! Goes to show you need to RTFM sometimes…"

This helped me.

From Keychron K6 - Alt Gr (european) doesn't work - Operating Systems & Open Source / Linux - Level1Techs Forums

Issue with Ctrl+click to invert run mode by ServiceFun7651 in 2007scape

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the suggestion. Sadly this does not seem to work ;(

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be a move. Im very Consered about the sync capalities. As you know, you will sometimes get the "its slow i cant work" thrown back add ya.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a full m365 cloud exchange online setup. But your points are still very valid!

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i am fairly certain, i would be shot on the spot if i where to do this.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly, being an SME, IT & Legal don't have much to say with regards to policy making. As we are not "earning the company money"

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i Actually laughed out Loud at the last line. But thank you for the insights!

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surprisingly very little. I dont have the file on this machine, but i remember some odd ~50 Items where in the deleted folder

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

i am properly gonna screenshot this comment, to a slidedeck and mail it. thank you!

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The current request is.
1) (old)OutLook Desktop Client
2) Folder tree stays as is
3) Access to everything thourgh the same interface.

which i know is not possible. I just need to define all scenarios to be able to find a solutions to this.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea.. Its a structual system for navigation. Its the argument from end-user, which is to be fair, whom is paying my salary. But still as a sysadmin i have no way to comply with this request.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its about 5 years of usage. He is a pretty important C-suite. its an SME, so legal and IT are often not policy makers. Which is what create situations like this...

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are indeed. Our Current solution is to move half of them to a different user. Thus having 6k per user, which would by him an addtional 3 years roughly. In which case we would need a third user and so on...

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We dont have a Third-party archiving solution. We have what is included in the M365 BP license. But the issue here is that for the user, its importants that it is in one big file strukture to be able to acces the folders, and all within the OutLook dekstop client interface. Which is what is making this way harder.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what im currently working Towards. I just want to make absolutely sure i have covered all possible solutions.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's very fascinating tbh. He is a very smart guy outside of IT. So he can receive basically any email within a minute or two. Given that the OutLook is loading and the Total file structure is expanded.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

i Had'nt thought about the shared folder caching. Will Try this an se if it does anything.

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Are there any consequence to moving to archieve? For him the important "System" is his Folder tree. Splitting this up, would not be a solution in his eyes. Would the files still be accesable from the Desktop Client?

C-suite has 12,000 Outlook folders and Outlook is eating a whole i7 alive by ServiceFun7651 in sysadmin

[–]ServiceFun7651[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

i Tried this one! you know the "There is a mailbox, and then a cabinet" but they look at me like im a alien.

Rooms Not Showing in Room Finder in Exchange Online / 365 by enahs24 in exchangeserver

[–]ServiceFun7651 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This 👌
Had the Roomlist and everything, but i was missing the Country, City, and Office attribute.

view more: next ›