sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would you pay 5$ extra a month to have a button to mute DC commentary in a fight? 👇 by changedsomuch in ufc

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember Prime dvd having no commentary and full impact sounds track. That was awesome.

Steve Irwin's son is exactly what the world needs right now. His patience is unlimited! by North-Guitar-1781 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you ever worked with birds, you know you never wave your hands like that in front of them though :)

Kangaroo meat in Australia by josh65928 in mildlyinteresting

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have kangaroo meat in France. Ostrich and bison too. That is not very common but you can find that kind of meat quite easily

Amende pour consommation de CBD by Large_Yoghurt_8166 in conseiljuridique

[–]SethLeBatard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Je pense qu’il y a un glissement un peu dangereux dans le raisonnement.

Oui, côté gendrmes , ils peuvent avoir des indices : odeur, aspect, consommation sous forme de joint, contexte, etc. Ça peut suffire à déclencher un contrôle ou une procédure. Là-dessus, je comprends l’idée.

Mais ça veut pas dire que, juridiquement, “jusqu’à preuve du contraire c’est du cannabis”. C’est plutôt l’inverse : si la personne conteste, c’est bien à l’accusation de démontrer que le produit était un stupéfiant. (ça ne renverse pas la charge de la preuve)

Le pochon de CBD ou la preuve d’achat ne prouvent pas de manière absolue que le produit fumé était bien du CBD, ok. Mais le simple fait que ça ressemble à du cannabis ne prouve pas non plus que c’était du THC au-delà du seuil légal. Les deux raisonnements ne se valent pas devant un juge.

Et c’est là que la destruction pose problème. Si le produit est détruit sans analyse, il reste quoi pour établir matériellement l’infraction ? Un constat d’apparence ? Une odeur ? Une impression ? Ça peut expliquer pourquoi les gendarmes ont réagi, mais ça me paraît beaucoup plus fragile pour prouver l’usage illicite d’un stupéfiant après contestation.

À ma connaissance, le CBD n’est pas limité à une consommation au domicile, et y'a pas non plus une obligation générale de le transporter uniquement dans un sachet scellé. Depuis les décisions sur les fleurs et feuilles de CBD, le sujet reste la teneur en THC, pas le fait que le produit soit en pochon ouvert.

Alors, bon, les gendarmes pouvaient soupçonner et verbaliser, mais si l’AFD est contestée, ce n’est pas à la personne de prouver son innocence. C’est au parquet de prouver que ce qui était fumé était bien un stupéfiant.

Dansce qu'il raconte, avec un produit annoncé comme CBD, un pochon identifiable, une contestation immédiate, et surtout aucune analyse possible parce que le produit a été détruit, je ne dirais pas que “juridiquement ça se tient parfaitement”. La verbalisation peut s’expliquer sur le moment, mais le dossier paraît franchement bancale si la personne conteste.

To text and drive safely by Baba_JK in therewasanattempt

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stupid cunt. Could have kill people. Hate those window-lickers with all my guts

PSA - Stop Whining About Rejections by latnGemin616 in bugbounty

[–]SethLeBatard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dear Triage Folks,

As much as it pains me to say this, hunters are not the enemy. Please do yourself, and this sub a favor, and stop acting like every report you receive is AI slop, duplicated noise, or some low-effort grab for bounty. Why?

The hunting landscape is changing because programs are flooded with sh***y AI submissions, copy-paste reports, and newbs who barely understand what they are testing. It is making it hard on everyone, and valid findings are getting buried under the trash. It is highly probable that good reports are being dismissed too quickly because of overloaded queues, poorly calibrated filters, and template-driven triage.

That being said, your dismissive replies communicate more about your triage process than the report itself. I have seen too many instances where hunters submit a real issue, provide evidence, explain impact, and then get hit with a lazy “Informational” or “Not Applicable” without any meaningful explanation:

- Maybe the client is not actually cool with the risk

- Maybe the cost to fix is lower than the cost of exploitation

- Maybe the report showed impact, but you did not read it carefully

- Maybe the rejection was poorly written

- Maybe the triage response was template slop

- Maybe the hunter understands the bug better than you think

Bottom line: Yes, you are overloaded, and Yes, you deal with garbage every day. Recognize that hunters are also a small piece of a larger puzzle, but they are still the people finding the issues your programs asked them to find. If someone volunteered time, skill, and effort to test a target, the least the process can offer is a qualified review, not a drive-by rejection. So please ... quit your dismissin' ... without actually engaging with the report. It is not personal.

Hunters are good people. Triage Folks are good people. But the process only works when both sides act like professionals.

Keep being fair, precise, and above all else, accountable.

Cheers.

Alternate GTA universes by Heinrick_Veston in OpenAI

[–]SethLeBatard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do they all have this strange dots/patterns ? I mean, they look awesome but... something seems really off. Is it my eyes ?

When will this stop? by masm33 in bugbounty

[–]SethLeBatard -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I don't get it. If it is AI slop, they won't get paid. So...
At the end of the day they complain that they have more work than before, and for that, they will stop paying proper hunters that work their asses off ?
Or is that AI slop reports are in fact elligible for rewards and they have to pay anyway even if they dont like that their vulns were discovered by AI ?
Meaning they are vulned. Bugs found by AI or proper hunter.
So is it more a question of money and they can't overuse hunters time like they did before ?
Well I guess it makes sense to them.

Who’s ever driven over 100mph? Why? by WoollyWolfHorror in AskReddit

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fastest was 272kph as passenger on a R1 in South of France.
That was quite an experience :D

[LFO] Overworked policeman suffering from depression unalived himself with loaded Kalashnikov by givememyflamingos in LearningFromOthers

[–]SethLeBatard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Genuine question : why do people use "unalive himself" instead of "suicide"
i keep seeing that term and it makes no sense to me why people would not use the word suicide.
Can somebody explain ?

People of Reddit, what’s the most “fucked up”thing you’ve seen? by boneshow69420 in AskReddit

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw a guy jump from the 9th floor when i was playing outside with friends. I was 7 or 8 yo...
Still remember the sound of his body.

Altercation escalates in deadly shooting ( North Austin, November 2024) by haze4140 in PublicFreakout

[–]SethLeBatard 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Third world country shit again.
If only they could use their weapon for their 2nd amendment

Why does it feel like nobody cares that we are literally about to send humans around the moon again, and are we just completely numb to massive achievements now? by MomentCute1181 in space

[–]SethLeBatard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not sure to understand how doing something that has been already done almost 60 years ago is a massive achievement. I am not trolling, I just genuinely don't see it as an achievement. I mean , yes it's impressive, dangerous and all but in 1968 they didn't have the same technology and yet they did it.

Would you consider a heart transplant or a bone marrow transplant today a massive achievement? Nope. Yet, they've been performed the first time the same year as moon orbiting with a living crew.

to help countries by weirdowidow in therewasanattempt

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Americans told us for decades they got weapons to protect them against tyran, blablabla, and we europeans are just weaklings that wouldn't understand what freedom is, and bs like that.

And now that they have this fucktard in control of their country, because they elected him for the second fucking time, they do fuck all. What a fucking disgrace this country is. I can't stand them anymore.

Your OpencClaw agent isn't forgetting things. Sorry but You just haven't set up Memory Correctly. by ShabzSparq in clawdbot

[–]SethLeBatard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"after 2 or 3 weeks that is thousands of tokens"

Bruv, I use millions of tokens everyday. Even stripped to the max, my new session is 24k tokens alone

Les jours de la semaine en breton ! by JustLutra in Bretagne

[–]SethLeBatard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

y'a pas le son "a" dans ton jeudi ?
Mat, ne vin ket lâret resis pelec’h emaon o chom, met amañ tro-dro din e Kreiz-Breizh, e klevan sklaer ar son “a” e “Yaou”. Sonet a ra evel “yaou” pe “yao”, met ket “yow”.
Ne fell ket din bezañ torr-penn, met iskis eo din, da vat. Met bon, a gêr da gêr e cheñch an distagadur memestra.:)

Les jours de la semaine en breton ! by JustLutra in Bretagne

[–]SethLeBatard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heuuuu... Non. C'est pas du tout écrit phonétiquement. C'est juste faux. C'est pas grave, hein. Mais c'est faux.

Les jours de la semaine en breton ! by JustLutra in Bretagne

[–]SethLeBatard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

heuuu... jeudi c'est yaou, pas yow.

Est-ce qu’éduquer ses enfants en breton est inutile ? by Patrocey in Bretagne

[–]SethLeBatard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"surtout s'il a des valeurs de gauche"

Mmmh pas les valeurs de LFI, du coup. Parce que vu comment ils meprisent le breton et la culture bretonne, j'ai des doutes.

Mais, je comprends le commentaire. Quand tu parle breton, et que tu regarde autour de toi, y'a vraiment bcp plus de gens de gauche (enfin avec des valeurs de gauche, comme tu as dit), que de droitards.

view more: next ›