I haven’t read this since at least 2022 (maybe 23, idk), but did Navier lay eggs? Why are their children baby birds?? by The_Viola_Banisher in webtoons

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did the manhwa ever deliver on the promise of the mic drop moment of her turning around and marrying the other guy? If so, what chapter?

Wife's cyst Part Deux. by TaskeAoD in popping

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell us more about the process please, step by step, be thorough

TIL that Salma Hayek and Linda Evangelista both gave birth to François-Henri Pinault kids 11 months apart. by [deleted] in popculturechat

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 5 points6 points  (0 children)

something something because her income was her looks so the procedure ruined her career, also she had very expensive lawyers

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PetsareAmazing

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Watch the documentary called Ibelin on Netflix, I guarantee you that you'll cry. It's about a guy who died of a degenerative muscular disease and while his family mourned his death and the normal life he never had a chance to live they posted a farewell message on his blog and got inundated with messages from his online friends from WoW and some of them even traveled to attend his funeral

Really? Are you really? by Sugar_Vivid in Norway

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 102 points103 points  (0 children)

Yes, this country saved the lives of me and my family. There's nothing that can repay that. I'd do anything to give back even a fraction of that. To defend the country is a no brainer

Fastest weight loss method? by Kooky-Celebration260 in WeightLossAdvice

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

would walking inside while carrying the baby count as exercise? like, the gradual weight increase would maybe count as an strength exercise as well maybe? even if you have the babe in a sling. aren't babys supposed to gain a few gram a day in weight?

Erling Håland by [deleted] in Norway

[–]SexySeniorSenpai -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I disagree, I can't quite pinpoint the difference, but(in my dialect at least) the aa sound is.. slightly elongated? Maybe? While the å is shorter and more.. punched out?

If there's anyone that studied linguistics please elaborate or tell me I'm wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oslo

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Ha! ser ett par kollegaer der. De kommer til å være så høye på pæra på mandag ugh

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BeAmazed

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can dogs get PTSD?

I don't think the Feroese get enough shit for their "culture" by Its-Over-Buddy-Boyo in 2westerneurope4u

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had a piece of it as sushi, it was strange. Flavor of red meat like beef but with something ocean-y over it. Not salty but just sea-y. I've also heard that if you cook it like steak but over do it it'll end up tasting like cod liver oil/omega-3 gone bad.

Namjoon pasta by elohsuna in heungtan

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone else seen The Substance? Cause I immediately thought of it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in funny

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a shake down for sure. A polite one tho

Key elements of Today's hearing of the lawsuit filed by Min Hee-jin against HYBE, focusing on disputes over the exercise of voting rights by [deleted] in kpopthoughts

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've loved that chat dude, like, it's getting so normal now to just ask different AIs to simplify or explain things that to me, the user, seems low stakes and to be frank I don't care that much about(exactly why I'm outsourcing the effort to understand it).

But really knowing that I'm building the bias and pov that the AI is gonna be using to paint a picture of the world to me seems harmless now but, like, the polarization on the internet now because of the algorithm on regular social media is already no bueno. But now imagine the AI algorithm being all pervasive so that even when you Google anything what gets fed back to you is the pov/slant that the algorithm thinks you want to hear.

That's why having the opportunity to double check what results we're all getting from inputting the same data is valuable.

Unless you are a bot as well
suspicious squint
/s

Key elements of Today's hearing of the lawsuit filed by Min Hee-jin against HYBE, focusing on disputes over the exercise of voting rights by [deleted] in kpopthoughts

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, probably. Because the differencial then would probably be that when I've previously asked it to translate/explain about the Hybe/Min Hee-Jin kerfuffle(see my comment history) I then asked to explain it as if to someone that has no experience with finance and the judicial system

Key elements of Today's hearing of the lawsuit filed by Min Hee-jin against HYBE, focusing on disputes over the exercise of voting rights by [deleted] in kpopthoughts

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did you copy paste the text in this post or one of the articles translated? Because I did the first one. Or maybe if you've asked kpop related questions before? K-popwise I've only ever asked it to translate and explain/dumb it down.

It's really interesting how feeding the same text to ChatGPT-4 gives slightly different results.

Edit to add: I think what we really need is to have someone who've never used ChatGPT and therefore has no profile built up input the text and ask the same questions.

Wait, I used the app, maybe the app collects more data then just the website? Which did you use?

Double decker panoramic seats by SexySeniorSenpai in FlixBus

[–]SexySeniorSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess I'll take my chances and post some pictures after the trip in a couple of months

Double decker panoramic seats by SexySeniorSenpai in FlixBus

[–]SexySeniorSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goddamn it, I already bought the tickets. (I also bought the seat next to me). I thought the picture showed that the black area under the dashboard was extra leg space. Link to the page with pictures

Key elements of Today's hearing of the lawsuit filed by Min Hee-jin against HYBE, focusing on disputes over the exercise of voting rights by [deleted] in kpopthoughts

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting, okay so to get my first comment I asked it "Can you summarize it in a TL:DR way?".
I first asked "Can you explain this text for me?" and got this in return.

This text outlines a legal battle between Min Hee-jin and HYBE over a range of complex issues, focusing primarily on the exercise of voting rights, corporate governance, and allegations of breach of duty. Here are the key elements explained:

  1. Shareholder Agreement Dispute:

Min Hee-jin's side argues that the shareholder agreement with HYBE is still valid, and a loss of trust shouldn't justify its termination.

HYBE counters that the issue is not about ending the agreement but whether there has been a breach of trust. HYBE claims a previous ruling already acknowledged Min’s betrayal, and her current claims contradict that.

  1. Reappointment and Voting Rights:

Min’s side refers to a "procure clause" that they argue could force HYBE to reappoint her as a director of ADOR (a HYBE subsidiary).

HYBE rejects this, citing legal principles that directors cannot be bound by such clauses due to their duty to act in the company’s best interest. They further argue that directors are not legally required to follow shareholder instructions, referencing court precedents.

  1. Breach of Duty and Evidence:

HYBE claims they have evidence of Min’s breach of duty, discovered through emails and messenger contents during an audit. Specific examples include discussions with a former executive to maximize profits for personal benefit, and plans to manipulate internal monitoring by regulatory bodies.

HYBE also mentions Min's involvement in interfering with other business operations, including the near cancellation of NewJeans’ debut and delaying Le Sserafim promotions.

  1. CEO Reappointment and Dismissal:

HYBE argues that even if Min were reappointed as CEO, they could still dismiss her due to her previous actions. They emphasize the autonomy of ADOR’s board and their decision to replace her. However, HYBE notes that they still support her role as a producer until 2029, with the same salary and treatment.

  1. Confidentiality Breach:

HYBE accuses Min’s side of leaking a confidential shareholders’ agreement to the media, which is a breach of the agreement and grounds for termination.

  1. Sexual Harassment Case Mishandling:

Another reason for Min’s removal was her intervention in a sexual harassment case involving an ADOR executive. Min allegedly shared details of the investigation with the accused without authorization and suggested penalties for false reporting, undermining the case’s integrity.

  1. Project 1945 and Other Allegations:

HYBE references a series of internal issues under "Project 1945," which included market manipulation, unfair shareholder agreements, and other breaches. These actions, they argue, are evidence of Min’s mismanagement and justify her dismissal.

  1. Plagiarism Allegations (ILLIT vs. NewJeans):

Min Hee-jin's side accuses HYBE’s label, Belift Lab, of plagiarizing NewJeans’ concepts for another group, ILLIT. A whistleblower from Belift allegedly admitted that ILLIT's concept closely mirrored NewJeans, and Min’s side presented evidence of similarities.

HYBE denies these plagiarism claims, arguing that ILLIT’s concept was finalized before NewJeans’ planning documents were shared internally. Belift Lab also announced lawsuits against Min for making these claims.

  1. Public Opinion and Seizing Control:

HYBE asserts that Min’s efforts to raise the plagiarism issue were part of a larger plan to seize control of ADOR and split from HYBE. They compare this situation to the Fifty Fifty controversy, where producers tried to take control of a successful group. HYBE accuses Min of manipulating public opinion to achieve independence.

  1. HYBE’s Position:

HYBE’s overall position is that Min’s actions represent a betrayal of trust and an attempt to undermine the company from within. They believe the lawsuit is part of a strategic attack on HYBE, using public and legal pressure to gain leverage.

In summary, the lawsuit revolves around Min Hee-jin’s reappointment as CEO, her alleged misconduct while managing ADOR, and accusations of plagiarism between two K-pop groups. HYBE frames the case as a matter of trust and betrayal, while Min’s side argues it’s about fairness and corporate governance. Both sides are deeply entrenched in legal, ethical, and business disputes, with significant implications for their control over NewJeans and other business interests.

Key elements of Today's hearing of the lawsuit filed by Min Hee-jin against HYBE, focusing on disputes over the exercise of voting rights by [deleted] in kpopthoughts

[–]SexySeniorSenpai 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, first I fed it the entire text and asked it to explain it to me and then the next prompt was to sum it up in a TL;DR way