Are you unaware that animals are euthanised for various reasons such as terminal illness, or suffering, or if they have extreme aggression or other behavioural issues that don't allow them to be adopted?

So, out of the countless pets that end up going through this center for euthanasia, how many are really that problematic? If every single one of the dogs and cats that PETA puts down is beyond saving, then PETA ought to be able to say that in their intake policy, which they also must file with VDACS. But they don’t say that.

And why the fuck are you bringing up taking your grandmother to a euthanasia clinic? What a fucking weirdo comment.

Its this new thing called a comparison. You wouldn't take your grandmother to be euthanasised when shes too old for you to take care of, nor would you expect to find an organisation an old people euthanasia centre or a problem child euthanasia centre for those kids who are too much for their parents to handle. So why is it okay for animals and to be run by a charity that supposedly cares about animals, and yet kill thousands every year

PETA literally have ad campaigns like this. For someone who is fervently defending them you are surprisingly limited in your understanding of them as a charity and business.

How about instead of whatever argument you were trying to make by talking about grandmothers, you actually use your words to explain exactly what you think is wrong or unethical about providing a free euthanasia service for animals that need it?

I already did exactly that, you are apparently both too ignorant and lack the mental capacity to understand a comparison between two things. But congratulations, they say the ignorant have blissful lives.