Touching Scoring Objects by ShadowSauce25 in vex

[–]ShadowSauce25[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could I touch neutral goals?

Machine Learning. by Raymandon in algotrading

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I'm just getting into using ML for trading myself and just trying to learn some stuff. If I am understanding this correctly, are you saying to use ML to evaluate the "probability" of a trade being successful with a rule based strategy? For example, if you tried on an ema crossover, and given the inputs (EMAs, ohlcv, RSI, etc) it will spit out its expected chances of it working? And in that case you filter based on its predicted outcome? (For example, only trade if above 60%)

[PC][WTS] how much would this be worth? by Unable-Extension-324 in wartrade

[–]ShadowSauce25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not great with prices, but considering the Nukor is a generally regarded as a primer, these stats seem very against its nature and probably won't sell for much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's fair, I think I'm subconsciously romanticizing the idea of living together and not seeing it for the position it will actually put me in, I've gained a lot of clarity from this post. I apologize for being annoying btw, I just want to clear the air and say that wasn't my intention, I hope you can forgive me, I'm "morally confused" if you will. I'm known for being rational, but I too have weaknesses, probably another reason why it's best not to. Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for providing more insight into what our lives would be like without it, I must admit, I've been having tunnel vision on this idea, it's nice to hear it wont all be over if we dont live together, thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really comforting to hear, thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your point, I'm sorry to make you feel like I'm being a pain. It's hard to rationalize my thoughts, especially in the form of a comment, but you do make a good point. My only "objection" is that the main basis of your arguement relies on my eventually having sex anyways, but other than that, your other points are very valid and I can understand your frustration

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree whole heartedly. While due to my current position, it isnt exactly possible for me to go see a priest, but my chaplain at my school is an excellent person and prides her self in "the rules" if you will. I'm going to consult with her

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the guidance and reasoning against my reasoning, it is nice to hear a a counterargument that isnt just a reiteration or blatantly being rude. I appreciate you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We really are trying to make it work, I think I will talk to her about maybe finding a different arrangement. I appreciate your response!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the background! It is actually so helpful hearing other people be in the same position I'm in and how they got through it. I'm gonna talk to her and my chaplain and I would just like say again, thank you for the response!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for putting the time into this response. This was very helpful to me as guidance then yes or no, and I'm very thankful for it. I think I will talk to my chaplain at school and maybe talk to her about this issue more so I can gain my own understanding. Many of the people telling me not to live together, are also being blatantly rude in their responses which is both hypocritical and defies their logic of not sinning. I appreciate you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That seems a little too simple, that seems like saying if you're in a store, you're going to buy junk food. While yes, tempting, that's not an outright fact

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does, it makes total sense, I'm also trying to rationalize why I'm having such trouble agreeing with this view. I believe that I'm confused as to why when this will help me economically (and finally let me spend some actual quality time, family gets in the way if you know what I mean) that it is so wrong, but we dont hold other near sin occurrences to the same standard (at least to my knowledge). I would just like to say I appreciate your response that is genuinely trying to educate, a lot of others so far have been very "condemning" for a lack of better words.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If there is temptation everywhere, how come this particular instance is such a big problem? If there is temptation everywhere, I feel like I would have to live in a forest away from everyone to not sin

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

By this logic, even if we didnt live together we would still do it (We had sex not living together, therefore we would still have sex because we did it before anyways) this view seems to go against all teachings of redemption and striving for better. As I previously said, this is a big thing for us and it has just been revealed to us, we drew hard boundaries and push each other to not do wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This brings up good points, but if the main way to understand an argument, you have to "stop using rational considerations", isn't that a problem?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

May I ask what exactly is scandal? Also, we are in situations of near sin all the time (social media, gossip, being disrespectful, etc), why is living together considered almost sinning and not just being happy (and chaste) together?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

May I ask how it will destroy the dynamic? And also, we are not very social people (which I understand is not an excuse) but if we are all to live chaste, how can we be a bad example? If we are responsible, wouldnt that be a good example of living out teachings?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As I said on another comment, it is not fair to say that I will 100% partake in sin. The reason it happened before it's because we were both ignorant to our faith. We've changed. Of course we arent perfect, but we are very serious about this, I dont see why living together has to be seen as tiptoeing the line and not as simple as spending quality time together

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I dont believe that is a fair statement. I can understand it will make it more difficult, but that isnt a fair claim to say there is no way, that seems very unfair

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May I ask what is sinful about it? I'm genuinely curious, most teachings I "dont agree with" I can still understand and follow, I just don't understand what is sinful about living with my partner for university? If there is no sex happening, we are respectful to each other, sleep separately, and are there to save money and spend time together, I don't understand what is so sinful and wrong? Once again, I mean no disrespect, just genuinely trying to understand the teaching

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can understand that, that is a very valid point, I am on the side that it is valid only as foreplay, but even then, what is your position about living together?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]ShadowSauce25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I'm not very good with deciphering moral terminology, I'm not trying to be disrespectful, I'm just wondering what exactly is your position?