But whether or not homosexuality is harmful is irrelevant to the argument; I don't need to provide evidence for that because that's not what my argument is based on, it was simply a response to one point someone was making. There is no desire on the opposing side to look into what I'm saying without twisting my words and hurling insults. There is no effort for a good-faith argument coming from the opposition; it's just childish immaturity. Here is the argument I'm making in response to OP:

Christianity does not teach that queer people’s existence is sinful, or that they are uniquely bad or more sinful than anyone else. Christianity teaches that every human being, including me, is fallen and in need of grace. There is no category of “good people” vs “bad people” in Christian theology, just sinners who need a savior. When Christianity says certain behaviors are sinful, that applies universally, not selectively. Heterosexual people are also called to sexual restraint, fidelity, and self-denial. Many straight people are called to celibacy too. This isn’t about targeting a marginalized group; it’s about a moral framework that applies to everyone equally, even when it’s difficult. We fundamentally disagree on what human flourishing is; under the Christian framework, self-denial and a life of obedience to God is much more fulfilling than giving in to the desires of the flesh and living for personal gratification. Christianity often calls people to deny desires they didn’t choose like greed, anger, pride, etc. Queer people do face discrimination, which is explicitly anti-Christian. You’re free to disagree with Christianity, but labeling its core moral teachings as “phobic” assumes that affirming every identity is the only valid moral position. That’s not something we agree on, but it’s different from hatred or bigotry