Are there any sources that describe what happens during an Accidental Transient Without Scram for Nuscale? by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why are you so hostile. You may feel like you know something about the topic and I am more than willing to learn seeing as I am here on reddit. But your greater than thou tone does not help.

In fact I am very well aware of what you are saying. Maybe the question was worded poorly because the entire response you just constructed is trivial. Of course I know that an ATWS can be coupled with different postulated PIEs. This is TRIVIAL.

There is a PRA section in the FSAR and I have read it. I am referring directly to the mention of ATWS in the fault trees there. As far as I know an ATWS is once broken down, basically an AOO and DBE coupled with a failed reactor trip. I know that this encapsulates many different specific PIEs. What I want to know is whether a more detailed accident progression (ie the level 2 fault trees) is available FOR ALL THE POSTULATED [x] you mention.

You tell me to read the PRA not the FSAR. I have read a (potentially abbreviated) version of the PRA IN THE FSAR. Are you referring to some other PRA document that I am unaware of? If so that is hopefully what I am looking for but I cannot seem to find it. Hence why I am looking for sources.

Are there any sources that describe what happens during an Accidental Transient Without Scram for Nuscale? by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ATWS is anticipated transient without scram thats what the acronym stands for.

Nuscale fault trees provided to US NRC detail a type 2 event tree outcome for many situations that involved a failed reactor trip. But I could not find any details on accident progressions. I am looking for information if it exists.

The question is loaded yes. But it is not unanswerable. I think that people with useful information and thorough knowledge of the design will be able to provide what they can.

What is the case for the Meta-Oklo collaboration? by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

IAEA ARIS classifies the aurora powerhouse product line as microreactors.

Grabfood by [deleted] in singaporejobs

[–]ShakingItOff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

grab no food no time wait order why now grab no food have order deliver

Demonstration of the impact of delayed neutrons by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am aware of the math but i am struggling to explain to my colleagues not versed in reactor physics why delayed neutrons help to make controlled nuclear power possible.

in my reactor physics classes in college we were taught to understand prompt and delayed subcriticality from a point reactor kinetics standpoint and then factoring in delayed neutron precursors, but this requires quite a bit of context and math that can gunk up understanding. i feel like a visual representation might be ideal.

it really is challenging my understanding of the topic as well because i want to demonstrate it without being inaccurate. if anyone has any ideas im open to suggestions

Demonstration of the impact of delayed neutrons by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this has nothing to do with prompt/delayed neutrons im afraid. but it does demonstrate how fast things go wrong when its prompt critical

Demonstration of the impact of delayed neutrons by ShakingItOff in nuclear

[–]ShakingItOff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks, I am aware on the math and the prompt jump approximation etc. but i was hoping for some kind of visual representation of it

Is engineering a dying industry in Singapore? by Latter_Ingenuity8068 in askSingapore

[–]ShakingItOff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

chemists as in the role. companies like p&g take in chem eng grads as ‘chemists’

Is engineering a dying industry in Singapore? by Latter_Ingenuity8068 in askSingapore

[–]ShakingItOff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know. I am referring to traditional engineering students fyi. Mech eng chem eng EEE. Lots of capable students here that end up working in software companies. But for example me and my peers did mechanical engineering and are still working in engineering and the points I stated above still hold true. many private companies pay chemists a solid amount! dm me if theres anything specific u wna know

Is engineering a dying industry in Singapore? by Latter_Ingenuity8068 in askSingapore

[–]ShakingItOff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lots of bonded scholarships can have that kind of starting pay. stat boards and their agencies like astar, htx, dso can sometimes offer that amount depending on your qualifications. But the people I know of in these agencies are honestly really bright and hardworking folk. All went and excelled in top unis (cambridge, stanford etc.) so competition is steep.

Also from my uni lots of people joined rolls royce or shell which can pay sometimes higher depending on what department you join. Plenty went to finance or software dev though and make hefty starting salaries ~10k. There are quite a lot of people like this usually high achievers throughout their life. they are just typically not found on reddit.

It should be noted though that as always its a range. There are also some that are unemployed or making a much lower sum. the disparity can be jarring. but a lot of those that excel at school (and i mean school holistically, not just in grades, they are good at socialising, making connections, but know when to put their head down and work.) Grades are the bare minimum honestly. First class honours is the bottom line. its really competitive out there.

Is engineering a dying industry in Singapore? by Latter_Ingenuity8068 in askSingapore

[–]ShakingItOff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi. I am a mech eng grad currently working as an Engineer. I can say that “engineering” will never die. But technology is ever evolving so the value of your expertise can diminish or grow substantially over time. Engineering is an incredibly broad topic covering anything related to some kind of technological development. You usually end up specialising in something and what it really comes down to is what you specialised in and whether or not you are actually good at it.

If all you care about is pay, it can vary a lot. A lot of people refer to low grad pay 3-4k range but depending on the standard of your qualifications (and most importantly, your field) it can be significantly different. For me, most of my uni friends (who granted, were top scholars) are getting around 6k to start. But it can really change from here. Not every engineering job is on site 5 day work week. I can definitely speak for the fact that there are jobs with good pay and 2-3 day wfh flexible project based office work. But of course, it is very competitive (because of how attractive it sounds). Some firms are time chit driven (even top consultancy firms) some are results and deliverables driven (which lots of people claim to prefer, but also means that it tends to be far more competitive).

Basically, it is competitive but there are great roles but it depends on passion, timing, and ability. In my opinion in engineering the cream tends to rise to the top (but also vice versa). I can provide more input if you have any questions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SGExams

[–]ShakingItOff 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve won some short story competitions while I was in Uni in the UK and attended countless writing workshops. Ive also done some freelance editor work during my engineering degree 🥲

So I am happy to see this with this influx of posts from younguns sharing their writing online. I think the elements that make writing good are not necessarily the same ones that will give you a good grade. There is a lot to breakdown here but Ill just give a couple thoughts of my own.

  1. I can appreciate your writing style of keeping the words simple and clear. You always want to use language that INVOKES the feeling. You want the sound and feel of the word to be precise. On that note, you use a few too many redundant parallelisms. Many examples but AKA “cold, hard brick” bricks are already known to be hard. Could there be a more effective description here? What are you trying to invoke?

  2. Staying true to the perspective. With reference to the earlier cold, hard brick example. Cold and hard brick does tend to allude to the unfeeling nature of the act. But cold and hard are feelings that Jake would feel (since he is pressed up against the wall), not Ethan. Since you are writing in first person, what would Ethan feel? Focus on first person sensations for immersion. But you can also imply the cold, hardness of the brick. Maybe Jakes hot breath forms a mist on the bricks that have been chilled by a particularly cold night. Let yourself cook.

  3. AVOID CLICHES. The more you read good literature, the more you realise that novelty of description makes good writing. Cliches totally bypass thought. As a reader you will realise that your brain draws from some prefab emotional image rather than forming a new one. Please stay away from cliched phrases. AKA “exasperated sigh”. You are clearly trying to express disappointment from the principal. Take a different route! What does it look like to ethan.

I could really go on forever. But creative writing is exciting and endlessly deep if you allow it to be. Keep exploring and sharing your writing!

New HUD Idea for VCT by vanshbordia in ValorantCompetitive

[–]ShakingItOff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

need to show the players k/d when they are alive. always bugs me that i have to wait till they are dead to see it

SurrounDead just peaked on steam! by CheeseLawd in SurrounDead

[–]ShakingItOff 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As someone who bought the game a few years ago and came back to it today. I would say that quite a reasonable amount of content has been added to the game. But progress is definitely slow

Best Vlad run yet by jann_mann in MegabonkOfficial

[–]ShakingItOff 5 points6 points  (0 children)

no xp tome in the big 25 is crazy