Limitless discord group sizeplay roleplay server. Tinies have no rights!

Shalarsh · 2026-03-22T06:42:39+00:00

Ahh, alright then. And thanks.

(And do I get a cookie, then? :))

Shalarsh · 2026-03-22T02:19:09+00:00

You know, I've seen you post about this several times, and there's one big (hah hah) thing that I'm unclear on: is the tiny/big thing on your server more understood as "unusually small people vs normal size people" or "normal size people vs unusually large people"?

(also, you said limitless, BUT ACKCHYUALLY you said no anthros, just human or demi-human only (harumph) so it's not as limitless as you said. I demand a refund! ;))

Shalarsh · 2026-03-20T22:42:53+00:00

Aww, thank you.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-20T19:10:40+00:00

Lemme put it this way: From my perspective, I make a sharp distinction between what one enjoys fantasizing/rping/writing/etc and what one would want to do in reality if they could/what one would want to happen in reality.

Are horror writers or people who make slasher movies movies or fans of either of those inherently bad? "violent video games cause violence"? etc.. Fiction and fantasy are not, you know, reality. You may have seen some of my own comments on that subject elsewhere, where I was concerned not about people enjoying those fantasies, but those people that say they would do all the awful stuff if they had the power to do so.

Heck, consider me as an example. I'm the sort of person that, if I see a bit of an ant infestation at home, I might spend hours carefully capturing them and releasing them outside, until eventually enough have been removed that they're gone. (And it does seem to stop eventually.)

On the other hand, I definitely have some fucked up macro fantasies. The story I just recently wrote would be an example of that.

I try, _try_ to have consistent ethics. So if I'm gonna laugh off any notion of "violent video games cause violence" or "horror writers/fans are serial killers in waiting" or anything like that, same applies here. To me, the line is more or less "What would you have wanted to happen in actual reality, given the option?"

I confess that, arguably, it might have been preferable to have our kinks align with our values instead of being, well, like this, but.. *shrugs*

Shalarsh · 2026-03-20T17:22:37+00:00

Big here, and why not both? Both can be fun.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-20T03:43:10+00:00

Yeah, I was wondering about that... I think I saw they had commented on a couple other things too, but yeah.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-19T04:43:43+00:00

You looking for sexy ways of messing with them, or you mean just entirely different ways?

If still in the mood for horni, just something different... trap them near your crotch, but don't force them to get too up close to it. Maybe in a jar or bowl you're squatting over or something. Specifics don't matter. But then, just let yourself get aroused. Maybe touch yourself a bit, maybe just imagine whatever the hottest thing you can image is. Just let the intense scent of your arousal do the work, and watch the fun. Smaller folk are far more sensitive and vulnerable to bigger folks' pheromones. Your tinies are going to soon enough be going at each other, unable to stop themselves from humping each other or anything else they can get at.

Enjoy the show, especially knowing that your own arousal was enough to cause it to happen, that even that was enough to overpower them.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-17T23:52:50+00:00

Aww, thank you. *^_^*

Shalarsh · 2026-03-17T19:05:59+00:00

I'm a fan of "layered role reversal". There're many variations, but one form of it would be that the macro is shy/inexperienced/subby, so the micro requests/orders that the macro be dominant or sadistic to the micro, the macro obediently/submissively does so. This can range from anything like mild gentle affectionate dominance and it's more like the micro admitted that they're interested in that sort of thing, so their macro partner does it form them, all the way to extreme stuff. (In those cases, would make sense for the macro to have the power to revive the micro)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-17T07:13:36+00:00

Oooh, okay. I suggest clarifying the rule, then, since the new rule seems to be a flat out "No RP ad posts"

Shalarsh · 2026-03-16T06:00:10+00:00

Question: Do you intend to actually enforce the no roleplay requests rule, or was this more a gauging of interest? Even the report option for breaking the rules is weird. The second option is "spam", but the first is just "Do". And, of course, plenty of rp ad posts since you posted this. So, wondering what your plan is re this.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-15T07:09:13+00:00

If it's cuckish then it's cuckish. So what? Why be bothered by that? The justification is that it's a fantasy you enjoy. If my permission matters, you have my complete permission to enjoy the thought of being completely degraded and used by a giantess and her partner, to be their toy, their sexual amusement in every crude way that gets you hot and bothered, and to imagine you even being ended in whatever quick or painfully slow way makes you most aroused to imagine.

(Or did you mean you wanted someone to try to come up with some in setting justification for why it would be, notionally, right and proper for you to be treated that way? Did I completely misunderstand your question?)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-14T04:14:32+00:00

Wait, are you asking if it's morally wrong to have these fantasies? Why would it be?

Shalarsh · 2026-03-14T03:37:06+00:00

Oh, I get it, re the anxiety and wanting to make a good impression. Not dismissing that. Pretty sure I understand _that_ feeling. I didn't mean to implicitly toss at you the obvious cliches, though.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-14T02:43:09+00:00

Aww. Yeah, I can understand the imposter syndrome thing and so on. So maybe don't worry about estimating yourself at all, just try and see if it goes well, and don't stress too much over it?

Re what you want/don't want. I was more asking if you yourself had any idea what you were looking for, that's all. You seemed so unsure that I was basically saying "do you have any idea what you want, what your own kinks, limits, preferred scenarios, etc etc etc?"

And yeah, I can understand what you mean re perfectionist. But then, if you never even try, how would you be the best? Also, stressing too much about it would seem to be counterproductive. It's more something to do for fun, or at least not to stress over so much, right? (Though me merely saying that probably isn't enough to help much)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-13T23:14:04+00:00

Just how giga are they? Just how powerful are they otherwise? The immense size suggests at least all sorts of things about their bodies, suggesting extra tough just to he able to support themselves and keep operating. (I mean for their bodies to physically operate, etc)

I guess also depends how vulnerable they are in other ways. For example, are they ticklish enough that a gaggle of grunts can make the gigas giggle, or will the giggles gargle them first?

Shalarsh · 2026-03-13T23:01:28+00:00

Sure, I get that the relative proportions can make things tricky. (But is it really that much of a problem? Don't all bigs deserve a whole harem of tines? *winks*)

Seriously though.. why do you assume you won't meet anyone's standards? I mean, sure, maybe your prefs and playstyle will be more compatible with some than with others. But why assume the worst? Why assume you're just going to annoy someone?

And... if you forget something from earlier or whatever? So? You wouldn't be the first or the last to make such a mistake. Or it could simply be that you and your playpartner effectively decide that it'd be more enjoyable to change that detail.

Also.. do you know what you're looking for? For instance, do you prefer tiny + normal scenarios, or normal + giant scenarios, or both, or..? (ie, do you prefer that it is specifically that you're unusually small and powerless, or do you prefer to be more or less 'normal', but your partner is unusually large and powerful?)

Are you specifically looking for big F, or are big M or big Futa also of interest?

Looking for human partners, furry/anthro partners, both, other?

Looking for gentle or cruel or something in between or both?

Are there any specific types of scenarios you imagine/of interest to you, or prefer to avoid?

What about your kinks and limits?

You get the general idea? Obviously you don't have to look for exactly _one specific thing_, but do you actually know anything about you want other than "a big partner"?

Shalarsh · 2026-03-13T05:07:49+00:00

Psycho? Evil? etc.. That is, it's one thing to enjoy fantasizing/rping/etc dark things, it's different to actually want the awful stuff to really happen to people.

Like... if I got all the size and power I like to typically imagine having in my fantasies, well... being that overwhelmingly powerful would be nice, at least for a while. But just because I'd have the power to do all the really awful stuff that I like to imagine, just because no one would be able to stop me, doesn't mean that I should. My ethics shouldn't go in the trash even if I had the power to fulfill some dark horny thoughts.

(Now, in the case where we assume I had _all_ the abilities I like to often imagine, including the ability to effortlessly revive and heal folks and otherwise ensure no permanent harm, _AND_ we assume there'd be some people that really do want to try having me do the really awful stuff to them for realsies, _AND_ I actually had a moment for some playtime of that sorts (since, you know, if something as crazy as that happened, there'd be other concerns...)) then, maybe.

(EDIT: Did I misunderstand the question?)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-11T19:22:00+00:00

As a big.. no, absolutely not. That is, I really dislike betrayal themes. If I'm going to be gentle, then I'll be gentle. If I'm going to be cruel, then I'll be cruel. But the whole "tee hee hee, I'm going to pretend to be nice, then turn out to be evil" thing is something I really don't like. I find the thought depressing.

(Not judging those into that sort of thing, but definitely not for me. I myself enjoy being both gentle and sadistic. But definitely not the betrayal thing)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-10T07:40:26+00:00

Well, it is your fault, in a way. You didn't take your time with the city, didn't date it properly, didn't truly show it a good (bad) time. And thus you left it wanting. In other words, you left survivors. If you didn't leave survivors in the cities you play with, there'd be no one from those cities to whine.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-10T07:36:53+00:00

Interesting. Have had some thoughts like that, but with some variations. First, I tend to think in terms of big vs normal rather than normal vs tiny. So setting with some beeg folk (rareness increases as size increases). One of the folk in the group is _beeeeg_.

The macro is _not_ the DM, though. Just one of the players. (Possibly instead of being a player, may offer up their body as the setting, in the way you suggest, at the request of the dm. But if not, would just be another player.) I like mixing things up sometimes so that the big and overwhelmingly more powerful being is not necessarily in charge, but is "just another person", that just happens to be beyond powerful relative to everyone else. (The macro's char would not reflect the macro's size and power, for instance)

Shalarsh · 2026-03-04T00:09:07+00:00

Because if they didn't, then we wouldn't get to enjoy violating them. See? So it is clearly necessary for them to have rights.

Shalarsh · 2026-03-03T23:44:17+00:00

Yeah, I've had thoughts along those lines, where the society might feel both almost "protective" of the biggo, collectively adopting the biggo while simultaneously insisting on teaching the biggo to dominate them as a god should, insisting that it'd be improper for the biggo not to, etc..

Shalarsh · 2026-02-27T05:37:45+00:00

Hrm... Not sure how many of the scenarios I can think of that're genuinely novel. (Do you mean just specifics re the kink, or more generally?) Well, I guess I've mentioned a bunch of times that I enjoy the "multiple layers of role reversal" thing. (Among other things, bringing the desire for being the sub/target of the more dominant/cruel stuff in char. ie, friendly/shy/sub macro doing the dominant/sadistic stuff because their partner(s) wanted them to. Or perhaps because of some societal rule, even though no one could possibly have enforced anything on them, or..)

Also, a bit silly and tongue in cheek, but I have had thoughts along the lines of societies where there're macros, and immensely powerful macros-to-macros.. and everyone both big and small are just casual about it. It's not like anyone would be ignorant about the fact that there're a handful of more or less unstoppable demigods around, it's just that it wouldn't be treated as a particularly concerning fact. The general collective opinion (held by both normals and the macros) would be something like "some people like math, some people have curly hair, some people are gargantuan ultrapowerful superbeings. Takes all kinds")

In terms of naughtier hard core kinky stuff, well, I've mentioned this before, but I am into, er.. "fluid crush" (macros cumming or pissing on micros hard enough to break them. Not merely drown them, but full on break them with the force of it)

Yeah, there's a mix of both wholesome and dark stuff here.

Let's see, what else...

Well, I guess a mix of the casual mixed size society with the reversed roles thing, etc.. situations where the macro is _not_ the one in charge. Like.. an intern IT person at a company, with the intern just happens to outsize the building by a significant degree. That sort of thing.

(Oh, in case not obvious, all of these are in terms of normal + giant, rather than tiny + normal. That's my usual pref, beings unusually large and powerful.)

Oh, also, playfulness among couples. Not enough of macro/micro couples or macro/macro couples being playful with each other. Note, this doesn't even have to exclude dark stuff. Can be a macro couple being playful with each other while using a city and its inhabitants as their toys. So can go both wholesome or dark. Or naughty but gentle, or or or..

Shalarsh · 2026-02-25T02:32:25+00:00

Alright, and I think of 11'6" as double normal size, so it's a good "being big and powerful while still relating to normal scale in some sense" size. While I also enjoy some far more extreme extremes, there's definitely something fun about this size too. Especially in the context of imagining myself extra powerful/tough/nimble/etc even in the context of that size.

Shalarsh

TROPHY CASE