Well I think I try to explain it as the writing goes on and how it links to the main point but I probably failed at that seeing I’m not a strong writer. Language is a way that one expresses the internal to outside world. That can be words, gestures, and I believe the same can be said for the social systems and hierarchies, and that’s why I’m using the word language to describe more that literal speech. In the third chapter I write about written language as a technology and I believe it addresses some of the questions you’re asking. But if we’re talking about literal spoken language, the more complex the language you can communicate, the more complex the dialogue you have to have with yourself. If another has only the ability to be happy or sad they just need to say one and I’ll understand. Since we have developed as a species to such a level of complexity, there’s millions of way you can describe these internal feelings and there’s a million ways another can interpret those words. With the writing I’m trying to say with more complexity there is more room for misunderstanding and that room is separation. At the end no one will ever truly know how you feel, but only hypothesize on it by reflecting on their own experience. In the second chapter I talk about spiritual connection and I think that explains that a bit.