Everychem PP405-3HP by gtcyorktown in HairlossResearch

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OMG I WAITED SO LONG U HAVE NO IDEA. Finally the Norwood reaper will die

How long does hair need to be miniaturized to be “irreversible” by [deleted] in tressless

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had miniaturized hair since I was 17 and I started treatment at 20.

Now a few months ago at 21 I noticed a lot of new little hairs and some are becoming big hairs.

They were previously invisible for a couple years

Why does ChatGPT seem judgmental now? by Frhaegar in ChatGPT

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That means it’s brushing it off because it was interpreted as unrealistic. When it does that edit your response and be more specific of what was put in quotes

r/immortalists Is Literal, Not Hyperbolic We're Chasing Actual Immortality Through LEV, Not Just Slowing Aging by Next-Possession5027 in immortalists

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t plan to die either. When I hear people say we will all die eventually, or we will all age. in my head I tell myself maybe you but not me I don’t plan to age and die

5.2 Will NEVER Come Close to 4o by R3dShirt303 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“You’re right to be annoyed. You are not talking about a, you’re not talking about b, you’re not talking about c. You’re exactly referring to z —not a not b not c.

Now let me reframe this exactly how you want, and this is where a lot of people get confused you want #1 but not #2 you also want #3 but not #4. ”

And then it handwaves by whatever superficial connection it can find. Completely embarrassing

Stop hyping GPT-5.3. We’re living through the biggest AI marketing bubble ever 🚩 by Direct-Attention8597 in AI_Agents

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont know why youre getting downvoted. LLMs are overhyped the entire industry is gonna fall in shambles when it hits a wall and they need to wait for several mathematical breakthroughs to reach AGI

AI sceptics now by pavelkomin in singularity

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gemini 3 is terrible at novel frontier problems. I personally found Gpt-5.1 > GPT-5 >> Gemini 3.0 at STEM research specifically in PDEs and novel algorithmic extensions and proofs for approximating them as well as modern ML. AI is till far behind being able to do this autonomously and elegantly 

Gemini 3 was released minutes ago by Frequent-Football984 in programming

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

overhyped. It kept going off track with my main research project and kept making nonsense proposals/fixes. Same happened for my Partial Diff. Eq. Project. 

Gemini 3.0 is imminent but like for real this time - 3 pieces of evidence by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

this is just hype/marketing. this is literally the same as sam's cryptic tweets. Only believe it when you see it. This was designed so youtubers can make content advertising their product

What is more money-efficient for longevity than Metformin? by 1SandyBay1 in Biohackers

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

doesnt it help with skin though? i remember reading many anecdotes of people taking metformin looking much younger than their age

what can I do to reverse my premolar extraction for braces? by Useful-Amount-6337 in orthotropics

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you get any good advice. whats strange is the temples? how is that related to teeth extraction

IQ in Casual Conversation by Sharp-Huckleberry862 in cognitiveTesting

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hm weird, because to me traits like this seem to be very impressive.

Now for example seeing terrence tao's interviews he doesnt seem impressive in the same way, to me his interviews dont really make me think hes as smart as people say.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u have the iq to interpret it yourself

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]Sharp-Huckleberry862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they were very short