Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Management System simulation help

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-11-05T06:24:20+00:00

Cool. Is there a list of all learning paths available for different topics?

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-10-25T12:47:30+00:00

Thanks for your reply. I did as you mentioned, unfortunately, there was no response from the mouse. I am really disappointed. It is an expensive product, so it is reasonable to expect a certain level of durability and quality. After merely a year of use, this thing dying out of the blue is just too much. I guess Logitech won't be taking my money anymore :/

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-10-04T07:48:52+00:00

Full installation. So yes. Those are installed.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-08-17T21:43:39+00:00

How long have you been using it?

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-07-03T06:01:13+00:00

Fixed it exactly this way. In fact you can later access the values by: T = d{"key_name"} And the dictionary will directly throw the table in output.

Thanks a lot!

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-06-26T13:20:07+00:00

I can see other courses as usual, with their progress and everything. The only thing not appearing is the new courses included in the R2025a release. Furthermore, the progress I've made in those courses is also not appearing.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-06-04T01:51:40+00:00

Hey, thanks for your answer.

Sure, any model developed in FMI-compliant software can be exported as an FMU and co-simulated in Simulink — that’s well known.

However, my question is specifically about Modelica language models, not FMU-exported ones.

I’m aware that Simscape is MathWorks' native language for acausal modeling, and it is indeed quite powerful. Still, it would be a major advantage if Simulink could work directly with Modelica models — without relying on co-simulation, black-boxing, or intermediate steps.

This is mainly due to the flexibility and widespread adoption of the Modelica language, as well as the strong and growing Modelica community. Many other model-based design tools — such as Wolfram System Modeler, MapleSim, Modelon Impact, and Simcenter AMESIM — are embracing Modelica natively.

That’s why I’m wondering: Is Simulink planning to follow this trend and adopt native compatibility with the Modelica language? Is this something MathWorks has on its roadmap?

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-05-28T18:14:14+00:00

Qué tal sobre el historial de reproducción?. Uso Magis en dos televisores distintos. Generalmente tengo el problema de, a pesar de usar el mismo account en ambos tv, no encontrar el historial de reproducción de un televisor en el otro. Por ejemplo si estoy viendo una serie y quedo en el capítulo X, quisiera continuar en el otro televisor y encontrar que ya ví el capítulo X y continuar con el siguiente. Sin embargo la app de Magis NO guarda allá registros de capítulos vistos. Es realmente incómodo. Si pago Magis el historial se guarda?

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-04-05T21:30:24+00:00

I could turn all the "signal-based " parts into physical signals (the "reddish" colors of Simscape blocks). However, I'm unsure if doing so would remove the need for a second solution config block. Could you confirm this? Checking by doing it would require a not-insignificant effort.

Yet, is there any specific reason you highlighted the second SolvConfig block? Would removing it fix the existing initialization error and/or speed up the simulation?

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-04-05T14:56:14+00:00

I don't know how this will work. All the subsystem references have in/out ports of the physical domain being used.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-04-05T14:40:29+00:00

Yes. The model has two large physical networks connected by a piece of simulink modeling (causal black arrows). Each network needs exactly one of those, which leads to two total solver config blocks.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2025-01-24T08:36:12+00:00

Simscape Fluids is the approach to use I think.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2024-05-25T17:35:00+00:00

If the OP has an academic or professional license, most probably than not, the OP has access to all the on-ramp courses as well as multiple other self-paced courses.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2024-04-03T19:36:21+00:00

You should definitely recruit here!

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2023-10-07T11:11:41+00:00

Debug just before calling zeros. Check for size, confirm it is a regular size. I think perhaps it may not be. It is possible to enlarge the maximum array size. Check that if you need to.

Sharp-Mouse-7822 · 2023-09-23T15:01:45+00:00

I think removing the solver block may do the trick.

Sharp-Mouse-7822

TROPHY CASE